Skip to main content

Archbishop Viganò & Professor of Canon Law Slowikowska vs. "Superdogma" Steve O'Reilly on his beloved Vatican II: "The Latin noun munus is an ambiguous word. In the teaching of the Second Vatican Council this word is present up 255 times... This can cause not only problems of interpretation, but also doctrinal problems"


    Vatican II, not being a dogmatic Council, did not intend to define any doctrinal truths, merely reiterating indirectly – and moreover in an often-equivocal form – doctrines previously clearly and unequivocally defined by the infallible authority of the Magisterium. It was unduly and forcibly regarded as “the” Council, the “superdogma” of the new “conciliar church,” to the point of defining it in relation to that event. - Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò [https://returntotradition.org/the-threat-on-which-the-council-hangs-archbishop-vigano/] 


Faculty of Law, Canon Law and Administration - Anna ...

kul.pl
https://www.kul.pl › anna-slowikowska,art_38801
Anna Słowikowska, J.C.D. - Associate Professor ... She graduated I High School in Puławy. From 2004 to 2008 she studied Canon Law at the John Paul II Catholic ...

The Latin noun munus is an ambiguous word. In the teaching of the Second Vatican Council this word is present up 255 times, whereof 55 times in the Constitution Lumen gentium. The Council Fathers used this term in the meaning of: “office”, “function”, “mission”, “service”, “task”, “obligation”, “ministry”. In many places the translations of constitution from Latin language into Polish language in 1968 and 2002 are different. This can cause not only problems of interpretation, but also doctrinal problems. -  Professor Anna Slowikowska, John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin in Poland [Anna Slowikowska, “Interpretation of the term munus in the Dogmatic Constitution on the Church Lumen Gentium” Annals of the Humanities, 2015 (125-145) -  Anna Slowikowska, John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin in Poland [ROCZNIKI HUMANISTYCZNE Tom LXIII, zeszyt 8 – 2015] –]


Steven O'Reilly
@S_OReilly_USA
(1/2) Benepapists are unable to refute the argument which demonstrates a 'munus is a ministerium' per Lumen Gentium (chapter III) -- and thus, BXVI's resignation was valid per c. 332.2.



Comments

Anonymous said…
Why does thinking Francis is an antipope freak Steve out more than calling the Catholic Church since Vatican II a fraud?
5:45 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more