Skip to main content

Archbishop Viganò & Professor of Canon Law Slowikowska vs. "Superdogma" Steve O'Reilly on his beloved Vatican II: "The Latin noun munus is an ambiguous word. In the teaching of the Second Vatican Council this word is present up 255 times... This can cause not only problems of interpretation, but also doctrinal problems"


    Vatican II, not being a dogmatic Council, did not intend to define any doctrinal truths, merely reiterating indirectly – and moreover in an often-equivocal form – doctrines previously clearly and unequivocally defined by the infallible authority of the Magisterium. It was unduly and forcibly regarded as “the” Council, the “superdogma” of the new “conciliar church,” to the point of defining it in relation to that event.Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò [https://returntotradition.org/the-threat-on-which-the-council-hangs-archbishop-vigano/] 


Anna Słowikowska, J.C.D. - Associate Professor ... She graduated I High School in Puławy. From 2004 to 2008 she studied Canon Law at the John Paul II Catholic ...

The Latin noun munus is an ambiguous word. In the teaching of the Second Vatican Council this word is present up 255 times, whereof 55 times in the Constitution Lumen gentium. The Council Fathers used this term in the meaning of: “office”, “function”, “mission”, “service”, “task”, “obligation”, “ministry”. In many places the translations of constitution from Latin language into Polish language in 1968 and 2002 are different. This can cause not only problems of interpretation, but also doctrinal problems. Professor Anna Slowikowska, John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin in Poland [Anna Slowikowska, “Interpretation of the term munus in the Dogmatic Constitution on the Church Lumen Gentium Annals of the Humanities, 2015 (125-145) -  Anna Slowikowska, John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin in Poland [ROCZNIKI HUMANISTYCZNE Tom LXIII, zeszyt 8 – 2015] ]


Steven O'Reilly
(1/2) Benepapists are unable to refute the argument which demonstrates a 'munus is a ministerium' per Lumen Gentium (chapter III) -- and thus, BXVI's resignation was valid per c. 332.2.



Comments

Anonymous said…
Why does thinking Francis is an antipope freak Steve out more than calling the Catholic Church since Vatican II a fraud?