Skip to main content

"How can there be sooo many mixed up people regarding Bergoglio [Francis]?" & "It is truly baffling... I keep thinking of that prophecy that even the elect will be fooled"

 The Warped Catechism of Jorge Bergoglio – Complicit Clergy

The Warped Catechism of Jorge Bergoglio ...

7 Blog Commenting Articles Every Blogger Should Read - Danielle HatfieldBecome Authentic Commenter By Writing Micro Posts

Many times the comments in the Catholic Monitor section are better than many of my posts. This time a long time reader of CM and someone who I know prays for me and the website, Praypraypray, wrote an excellent text and comment which needed to be a posted below:

How can there be sooo many mixed up people regarding Bergoglio?

How can they call him the Holy Father!?!

He's an idolater of the "earth goddess" pachamama!!!
I just don't get it!?!

And so many that I thought were starting to come around
&
see the truth about Bergoglio,
instantly
caved and followed him like a puppy following some stranger with a dog treat,
when he said
he was going to
do the Fatima consecration !!!
🤷🏻‍♀️🤷🏻‍♀️🤷🏻‍♀️🤷🏻‍♀️🤷🏻‍♀️🤷🏻‍♀️🤷🏻‍♀️🤷🏻‍♀️🤷🏻‍♀️🤷🏻‍♀️🤷🏻‍♀️

The guy didn't seem to care or bother much about Fatima before... even ignoring some of the special days or events that past popes had attended...

Then, all of a sudden,
I guess they had
wishful thinking...

If only he consecrates Russia, then they figured they'd have peace
&
a sort of ...
 
... I was just writing that
to you out of frustration...
because,
You get it
&
sometimes it seems as if
only a handful of people
are thinking straight...

It is truly baffling...

I keep thinking of that prophecy
that
even the elect will be fooled...
 
Below is her comment: 
 
Thank you for this very important article.

It’s so pathetic that they have yet to pronounce him an idol worshipper, after all of this evil pagan idol worship. It’s truly an abomination!

I’ve read countless stories and comments about the evil coming from the Vatican and Amazon Synod. It’s infuriating! Where are the true Catholics/Christians!?! So many people are saying, just wait until God or Our Lady do something about this!

Now, I'm Not saying that God or Our Lady won’t intervene. It’s just that these people seem so cowardly. It reminds me of children saying, “Just wait until I tell my Dad or Mom on you!” Moses, himself, threw the tablets to make them get rid of the golden calf. Why can’t they strongly say or do something about this!?! Where is their courage to stand up for Truth, for Christ and His Church!?!

Some of them are saying, Saint ____, (fill in the blank), would burn the idols and kick the idol worshippers out of the Church, yet these people allow all of this idol worship and these demonic pagan practices to take place in Catholic holy places.

Many of the Saints knew that they would be killed for destroying idols, yet they destroyed them and died martyrs’ deaths, because they cared more about Christ and His Church, than worrying about their own lives. Sadly, today, people don’t even speak out if they fear they might not get invited to certain parties or might get verbally scolded or arrested.

Why do the Cardinals wear the red, which stands for martyrdom, when most don’t even want to speak against this abominable evil? What are they waiting for?... human sacrifice on the altars in Catholic Churches?... before they finally utter a word against it all!

It’s PATHETIC!


Thank you for calling them to do something substantial. God bless you, Fred.
[http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2019/10/it-is-sheer-madness-if-cd-muller-doesnt.html?m=1]

Here is the post:

It is Sheer Madness if Cd. Muller doesn't Convene a Imperfect Council to Remove Francis as a Heretic against the First Commandment
Today, LifeSiteNews reported that Francis confirmed that the idols that were prostrated before and worshipped in front of Francis in the Vatican gardens were images of the pagan goddess Pachamama:

"Pope Francis has... confirm[ed] suspicions that the ["Vatican 'Pachamama'"] statues were idols."

Moreover, the news outlet quotes Francis himself declaring the "pachamama" idols were recovered and may scandalously and sacrilegiously be "displayed... at the closing Mass of the Synod":

"I would like to say a word about the pachamama statues that were removed from the Church at Traspontina, which were there without idolatrous intentions... the Carabinieri... commander said, 'the display of the [idol] statues [will be] at the closing Mass of the Synod.' We'll see."

"I delegate the Secretary of State who will respond to this."

"This is good news, thank you."
(LifeSiteNews, "Full transcript of the Pope's comments on pagan 'Pachamama' statues" and "Pope calls statues 'Pachamama' and apologizes for their removal from church," October 25, 2019)

The LifeSiteNews article, also, revealed that former head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith Cardinal Gerhard Muller on EWTN said:

"[A]ccording to the Law of God Himself - the First Commandment - idolism [idolatry] is a grave sin... to bring the idols into the Church was a grave sin, a crime against the Divine Law."

It is apparently beyond doubt that Francis is a explicit heretic in terms of the First Commandment.

Cardinal Muller said Francis actions are "a crime against Divine Law."

Even supposing that Francis's actions had no "idolatrous intentions" which can only be judged by a imperfect council, the very "bring[ing] [of] the idols into the Church" and now saying that he is open and apparently willing to commit the scandalous sacrilege of "display[ing]... the [Sachamama idol] statues at the closing Mass of the Synod" which is "a crime against" the First Commandment that means he is "knowingly corrupt[ing] the faith."

To understand the enormity of the grave heresy, crime and sin of Francis just imagine if Moses on seeing his people prostrating in front of the graven idols had said there was no "idolatrous intentions" so let's "display" the idols in God's Paschal liturgy.

St. Thomas Aquinas stated "idolatry is the most grievous sin" in which "heretics... knowingly corrupt the faith."

There appears to be no doubt that Francis is as Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales says is "explicitly a heretic" in terms of the First Commandment who must by the "Church... [be] declar[ed]... deprived of his Apostlic See":

"The Pope... when he is explicitly a heretic... the Church must either deprive him or as some say declare him deprived of his Apostlic See."
(The Catholic Controversy by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)

It is now sheer madness if Cardinal Muller and the other faithful Catholic cardinals do not convene an imperfect council to "declare" Francis "deprived of his Apostlic See" after he is given canonical due process and allowed the opportunity to recant and, also, to investigate the validity of the Francis conclave and the resignation of Pope Benedict XVI which Bishop Rene Gracida has called for.

The greatest Doctor of the Church St. Thomas Aquinas in the Summa Theologiae in "3. Whether idolatry is the gravest of sins?" condemned Francis when he wrote the sin against the First Commandment idolatry is the "most grievous sin" especially when "heretics... knowingly corrupt the faith":

"[I]dolatry is the most grievous sin... heretics, if they knowingly corrupt the faith they have received, from sinning more grievously than idolaters who sin through ignorance... Idolatry presupposes internal unbelief... Idolatry includes a grievous blasphemy."
(Newadvent.org, Summa Theologiae: Idolatry (Secunda Secundea Partis, Q. 94)

Finally, this is a warning to myself and all Catholics, but especially to Cardinal Muller and all the cardinals who believe the Catholic faith.

Our God given faith united with our free will actions as well as our non-actions determine if we go to Heaven or Hell.

God is looking at you right now.

Your actions or non-actions may determine not just rather you fail to do God's will in this ultimate crisis of the Church, but rather you may spend eternity with the all-loving God or spend eternity with the all-hating Satan and his demons one of whom is Pachamama.

"For all the gods of the Gentiles [heathens] are devils."
- Douay-Rheims, Psalms 96:5

 

Comments

T said…
I think he might be the false prophet, the one who will take away the daily sacrifice and replace it with the abomination of desolation.

I believe that God would permit such a thing because he will soon judge the world, and judgement begins in the House of the Lord. His apostasy is in your face, the only way you can not notice it is if you are a fake Catholic or suffer from cognitive dissonance. Many just look away and make excuses about not having authority or not judging hearts. Only those who know the teaching of the Lord and love Him above all else will have the courage to say the emperor is naked. Everyone else will call the false prophet true pope, and maybe even doubt that the office is divinely protected. Those who stay loyal to the teachings of Christ will be called schismatic, but before God they have merit. People will be to terrified to realize the imposter couldn’t be a true pope because they fear he’ll more than they love God. Perfect love casts out fear.

That’s how I understand prophecies about the false prophet. Refer to the long form of the St Michael prayer.
Anonymous said…
Benedict isn't Pope anymore, go see him and ask him.
T said…
So you’re saying the pope can be an isolator and the head of the Church at the same time?

Maybe if he moves to Germany and stops speaking, dressing and acting like a pope his denial will sound credible and not under duress.
T said…
*idolator
Anonymous said…
Do former Presidents still sport mens suits? Most of the time, they do. I haven't seen Donald Trump not in a suit other than for Golf since he left office.

It's a silly argument to make, he is a former Pope...his intentions have been made clear by him and the fact that none of the Cardinals report to him anymore...Benedict is Pope has no leg to stand on. Perhaps a council or future Pope declares Jorge Bergoglio an Anti-Pope...but universal acceptance that Bergoglio is the current pontiff has not been challenged by anyone in the legal hierarchy of the church. Patrick Coffin, Freddy Martinez, Ann Barnhardt, Acosta etc do not speak for the Catholic church.
T said…
https://www.papalencyclicals.net/councils/ecum05.htm

“ These matters having been treated with thorough-going exactness, we bear in mind what was promised about the holy church and him who said that the gates of hell will not prevail against it (by these we understand the death-dealing tongues of heretics); we also bear in mind what was prophesied about the church by Hosea when he said, I shall betroth you to me in faithfulness and you shall know the Lord; and we count along with the devil, the father of lies, the uncontrolled tongues of heretics and their heretical writings, together with the heretics themselves who have persisted in their heresy even to death.”

I can guarantee you it is not morally wrong to convince other people of the truth of Catholicism, the gospel gives the state the right to inflict capital punishment, God gives everyone enough grace to avoid mortal and venial sin and that idol worship, if not given to fictional beings, are offered to devils.
Anonymous said…
Francis has not been declared a heretic by the church, the correct authority to do such a thing. Maybe in 50 years, they'll say that he's an Anti-Pope. Until then, good Catholics submit to the authority and resist any heretical/harmful teachings he commands as it could potentially lead people into mortal sin.
Unknown said…
Anonymous,
How can you excpect any resistance to heretical/harmful teaching of a false prophet, from the V2 novus ordo catholics when most of them are not able to distinguish good from evil?

Ivan

Popular posts from this blog

Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Francis teaches HERESY," now, the question is will he do a Skojec & a Schneider Cop Out

    Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation: "[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic , he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him , or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See." (The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306) Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Pope Francis teaches HERESY: Pope Pius XII condemned the heresy of Francis": Pope Francis on Feb 2 2022, taught, "that in Christ no one can ever truly separate us from those we love because the bond is an existential bond, a strong bond that is in our very nature...who have denied the faith, who are apostates." Pope Pius XII taught the exact opposite when he wrote of those: "who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or b

Wernz-Vidal: "One cannot consider as Schismatics those who Refuse to Obey the Roman Pontiff because they would hold his person Suspect or, because of Widespread Rumors, Doubtfully Elected"

    Pope Francis is tottering on the precipice of Hell. None of this means he isn't the pope, and such talk among the laity is scandalous in its own right. Not a single cardinal in that 2013 conclave has come out and said the election was rigged and Bergoglio isn't the pope, that he is in fact an anti-pope . If he is, a future pope can declare that, when Jorge Bergoglio will no longer be a pope. But if the very men gathered in conclave haven't made that public accusation,  anyone who is suggesting that better take into account that they too will have to give an account of themselves to Almighty God when they die . Such talk adds to the scandal of the "little ones," the simple, even potential converts, who, when they hear big-mouth Catholics on social media saying he's not really the pope, draw back from approaching the Church. Do any of us desire to stand in front Our Blessed Lord as the Supreme Judge and explain why, in our desire for more c

The Nuremberg Trial-like Excuse which Cardinal Burke has so Staggeringly, so Stereotypically Proffered on the Promised “Formal Correction”

Does Cardinal Burke think Francis is an antipope? On at least five occasions, Cardinal Burke has rejected the magisterial nature of official papal teaching (in one case, pre-emptively dismissing a hypothetical official teaching of the Magisterium): Cardinal Burke has rejected the official teaching of Pope Francis in the new Apostolic Constitution Episcopalis Communio concerning the possibility that a pope can raise the final synodal document to the level of ordinary magisterium, if the pope chooses. (We covered the Episcopalis Communio here .) The whole apostolic constitution on the Synod is problematic. … This idea that either the Pope on his own or the Synod together with the Pope can create some new Magisterium [i.e. a new teaching of the ordinary Magisterium], is simply false. The Synod is a consultative body, to help the Pope to see how best to present the Church’s teaching in time. It’s not able to create ordinary Magisterium. As a canon lawyer, Cardinal Burk