Skip to main content

Are we being Played by the COVID Flim-Flam Fabricated by the Chinese & Globalists, again?

Flim flam artists still look to sting Florida lawyers – The Florida Bar

 Trump's most dangerous flim-flam: False hope and quack advice | Salon.com

What’s Really Going On With China’s Coronadoom Policy In Shanghai?

If we had to pick one image to sum up China’s coronadoom policy:

Shanghai is locked down. People aren’t allowed outside their government-designed domiciles. Except for small numbers of building representatives who venture out to gather food. Which is running low, precious low. Meat is near non-existent. Maybe that’s what the bags of cats are for.

People are opening their windows and screaming their woes into the black of night. Drones caution people not to sing. Men in spacesuits wander the streets spraying mysterious substances into the air.

They say.

But what’s really going on in China, that Expertocracy par excellence? Are these horrifying videos more sweet propaganda? Or maybe they are real and China has gone quite mad? Or is this just inscrutable Chinese behavior? Is Xi taking some kind of hidden revenge on Shanghai?

We all saw the propaganda videos at the beginning of the man-made coronadoom panic, which were obvious BS. It is natural to suppose we’re seeing the same thing again: government-directed propaganda to get the world to re-panic, just as it is inclined to calm down. After all, China rigorously controls its internet, so the pictures and videos it allows out might be managed.

Yet this doesn’t have that feel. And as good as China’s control is, it is not total. Too many videos are coming out. Here’s a long thread of them. Of course, the Chinese might be purposely allowing these “leaks”, for the same propaganda purposes, leveraging midwit dupes in Western media.- Renowned statistician William Briggs [https://www.wmbriggs.com/post/39640/]

Here's a post from 2020:


https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2020/08/wuhan-pool-00-1.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=1033

"Disturbing images [from a week ago] have emerged showing swimmers in China’s former coronavirus epicenter crammed together for a massive pool party... Officially, the total number of recorded COVID cases in China currently stands at 84,849, with 4,634 deaths. But given the authoritarian nature of the regime, some have cast doubt on the [real] statistics." [https://nypost.com/2020/08/17/shocking-images-show-packed-wuhan-pool-party-in-former-coronavirus-ground-zero/]

The Chinese and globalists may have used it (I am speculating, but with some evidence in a reasonable and coherent analysis) for four purposes:

- To end specifically protests that were against terrible air pollution which were in my opinion a backhanded attack on the Chinese totalitarianism. Wuhan is maybe its top industrial and financial city that is known since Tiananmen to be anti-totalitarian.

- Possibly to concoct the virus scare to not just stop protests movements against the totalitarian regime and maybe under the cover of the dragonian lockdowns to kill thousands of Wuhan protesters with the coronavirus cover. They are more than capable of doing such things as Tiananmen proves.

- Coincidentally, the Chinese probably top industrial city, Wuhan, is firing up just as its top Western economic competitors have shutdown their economies and have no social distancing nor apparently do they have masks.


- Finally, it appears that the globalists such as Bill Gates and collaborators like Francis are using it to push socialistic totalitarianism in the West under the guise of saving people from the Black Plague coronavirus. And as a cherry on the top of the whole possible flim-flam, Gates gets to make billions of dollars on his vaccines which are being pushed by his collaborator Fauci. - Catholic Monitor

On the coronavirus crisis, you could not have two more different perspectives than China expert Steven Mosher and One Peter Five publisher Steve Skojec.

Mosher has been against the Communist Chinese-like lockdowns and has constantly said COVID-19 is no where close to being like the Black Plague.

While Skojec has been one of the biggest promoters of totalitarian lockdowns and banning of the Mass because he apparently believes the conspiracy theories that there might be "65 million" to a couple of million deaths due to the coronavirus which pro-abortion eugenicist Michael Savage and space alien believer Alex Jones started pushing in January as well as Bill Gates collaborator Anthony Fauci on the lower prediction numbers of a couple of million deaths in the United States which he started pushing a bit later.

Before getting into why a theory of Mosher may be wrong, I want to say that he is one of the top pro-life leaders in the United States.

When I interviewed him so as to write an article for the San Francisco Faith, some years ago, I found him to be so deeply insightful that I wrote one chapter on him and his pro-life work in my book "Hidden Axis."

The great pro-life leader Fr. Paul Marx and his close colleague Ginny Hitchcock who I am honored to call a friend thought he was and is one of the top pro-life leaders in the world.

That said, I think Mosher's theory that he proposed in a LifeSiteNews article that Wuhan's coronavirus death toll is "20 times higher than [the] official count" is speculation at best.

The reason that I am writing this piece is because in his One Peter Five podcast, yesterday, Skojec linked to Mosher's theory in that LifeSiteNews piece to promote his call to continue banning of the Mass and totalitarian lockdowns for months more because he seems to equate this virus to a type of Black Plague.

Conjecturally, Mosher because there is evidence that many thousands may have died in Wuhan is "suggesting" that those many thousands were "COVID-19 deaths 20 times higher than [the] official count."

This is allowing people like Skojec who want to continue banning the Mass and having lockdowns for months to claim we need the Communist-like lockdowns because see the China expert says that there were many more thousands of deaths due to the virus in Wuhan.

Mosher in the article said there were "perhaps 50,000" deaths due to the coronavirus. This is pure speculation. First, he used the word "perhaps" which shows he knows this is speculation. Moreover, even if there were "50,000" deaths how can he possibly know that those deaths were due to the virus.
(LifeSiteNews, "Evidence from Wuhan's morgues, crematoriums suggests COVID-19 deaths 20 times higher than official counts, April 6, 2020)

The answer is the article presents zero solid evidence that those "perhaps" deaths were caused by coronavirus.

He as a good China expert knows and says that the Chinese Marxist regime lies.

I totally agree with him.

But, just because they lie it doesn't prove those deaths were coronavirus deaths.

Mosher should know that just a few months before these thousands of deaths that there were:

"Thousands of citizens in Wuhan" protesting, but strangely, unlike the Wuhan coronavirus outbreak in which there were many videos supposedly showing a out of control Wuhan pandemic which Alex Jones and Skojec showed earlier in the years, in the summer in the Wuhan protests where there were "[v]ideos and photos of the crowded streets and clashes between the protesters and police [the "[v]ideos and photos" were] censored within hours."
(BBC, "Wuhan protests: Incinerator plan Sparks Mass unrest, July 8, 2019)

Why did the Communist censors allow videos into the West of the Wuhan outbreak and so totally blackout all the Wuhan protest videos?

Is it possible that there was a real coronavirus normal non-earthshaking outbreak which the Marxist regime flim-flamed its major economic competitors in the West into believing was a new Black Plague that required the shutdown of their economies just as China's economy restarted?

Pointedly, those places that know China best such as Taiwan, South Korea and Hong Kong didn't shutdown their economies while having the most success at containing the coronavirus of any block of countries.

Moreover, where the Communist once had protest movements against their totalitarianism in Hong Kong and Wuhan there are no more protests.

Mr. Mosher as a China expert don't you know that in the Tiananmen Square protests the "death toll 'was 10,000'" and also during the "Tiananmen Square protests, students in Wuhan blocked the Yangtze River Railway and another 4,000 gathered at the railway station."
(BBC, Tiananmen Square protests death toll 'was 10,000'" December 23, 2017 and Wikipedia, "Wuhan")

Why couldn't those thousands of "perhaps 50,000" deaths have been the thousands who protested in the summer Wuhan protests?

The only evidence I have is that it is a historical fact that the Chinese Communist have done it before.

I want to say that much of the above piece is an attempt to connect dots which was greatly assisted by biotech scientist Dr. Ayyaddural Shiva's analysis of many of the global players in this crisis as well as his science analysis of the coronavirus implications.

Dr. Shiva, one of the inventors of email, and I both appear to think that the virus is a normal viral outbreak that happens such as the flu outbreak that killed 80,000 a few years ago that's being promoted as a kind of Black Plague for political and financial purposes.

The Chinese and globalists may have used it (I am speculating, but with some evidence in a reasonable and coherent analysis) for four purposes:

- To end specifically protests that were against terrible air pollution which were in my opinion a backhanded attack on the Chinese totalitarianism. Wuhan is maybe its top industrial and financial city that is known since Tiananmen to be anti-totalitarian.

- Possibly to concoct the virus scare to not just stop protests movements against the totalitarian regime and maybe under the cover of the dragonian lockdowns to kill thousands of Wuhan protesters with the coronavirus cover. They are more than capable of doing such things as Tiananmen proves.

- Coincidentally, the Chinese probably top industrial city, Wuhan, is firing up just as its top Western economic competitors have shutdown their economies and have no social distancing nor apparently do they have masks.

- Finally, it appears that the globalists such as Bill Gates and collaborators like Francis are using it to push socialistic totalitarianism in the West under the guise of saving people from the Black Plague coronavirus. And as a cherry on the top of the whole possible flim-flam, Gates gets to make billions of dollars on his vaccines which are being pushed by his collaborator Fauci.

"There is no hope whatever for those societies which abandon the austere worship of truth for the idolatry of [so-called] genius. On the heels of sophisms come revolutions; on the heels of the sophists, executioners.” - Donoso Cortes

Image

The USA COVID masked zombie majority vs. the USA free non-masked being told to obey

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Mass and the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Also, pray an Our Father now for God to give President Trump the grace to do His will in this present crisis.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Francis teaches HERESY," now, the question is will he do a Skojec & a Schneider Cop Out

    Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation: "[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic , he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him , or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See." (The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306) Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Pope Francis teaches HERESY: Pope Pius XII condemned the heresy of Francis": Pope Francis on Feb 2 2022, taught, "that in Christ no one can ever truly separate us from those we love because the bond is an existential bond, a strong bond that is in our very nature...who have denied the faith, who are apostates." Pope Pius XII taught the exact opposite when he wrote of those: "who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or b

Wernz-Vidal: "One cannot consider as Schismatics those who Refuse to Obey the Roman Pontiff because they would hold his person Suspect or, because of Widespread Rumors, Doubtfully Elected"

    Pope Francis is tottering on the precipice of Hell. None of this means he isn't the pope, and such talk among the laity is scandalous in its own right. Not a single cardinal in that 2013 conclave has come out and said the election was rigged and Bergoglio isn't the pope, that he is in fact an anti-pope . If he is, a future pope can declare that, when Jorge Bergoglio will no longer be a pope. But if the very men gathered in conclave haven't made that public accusation,  anyone who is suggesting that better take into account that they too will have to give an account of themselves to Almighty God when they die . Such talk adds to the scandal of the "little ones," the simple, even potential converts, who, when they hear big-mouth Catholics on social media saying he's not really the pope, draw back from approaching the Church. Do any of us desire to stand in front Our Blessed Lord as the Supreme Judge and explain why, in our desire for more c

The Nuremberg Trial-like Excuse which Cardinal Burke has so Staggeringly, so Stereotypically Proffered on the Promised “Formal Correction”

Does Cardinal Burke think Francis is an antipope? On at least five occasions, Cardinal Burke has rejected the magisterial nature of official papal teaching (in one case, pre-emptively dismissing a hypothetical official teaching of the Magisterium): Cardinal Burke has rejected the official teaching of Pope Francis in the new Apostolic Constitution Episcopalis Communio concerning the possibility that a pope can raise the final synodal document to the level of ordinary magisterium, if the pope chooses. (We covered the Episcopalis Communio here .) The whole apostolic constitution on the Synod is problematic. … This idea that either the Pope on his own or the Synod together with the Pope can create some new Magisterium [i.e. a new teaching of the ordinary Magisterium], is simply false. The Synod is a consultative body, to help the Pope to see how best to present the Church’s teaching in time. It’s not able to create ordinary Magisterium. As a canon lawyer, Cardinal Burk