It appears that even House Democrats are afraid that "Biden’s Mental State is Compromised" & that he may Start a Nuclear War
there is one man I can imagine...
turning Cold War II into World War III, it is the self-anointed heir of
FDR, Joseph Robinette Biden." - Bloomberg's Niall Ferguson
Are even Democrats afraid that Joe "Biden’s mental state is compromised" and that he may start a nuclear war?
Gateway Pundit revealed "REPORT: Democrats Don’t Want Biden To Have Full Control Of Nuclear Weapons":
According to recent reports, there are a number of Democrats who don’t want Joe Biden to have full control of America’s nuclear weapons.
Do they know something the rest of us don’t? Or is it possible that they know what everyone knows, that Biden’s mental state is compromised by his advanced age?
Either way, this isn’t a very good look.
Hot Air reports:
Say, Why Are House Dems Calling On Biden To Give Up Full Control Of Nuclear Weapons?
Which answer do you want first — the fun answer, or the better answer? Let’s start off with the fun answer, but first, let’s specify precisely what House Democrats want from Joe Biden. A letter signed by three dozen of his party’s caucus urges the new president to relinquish full control over the country’s nuclear weapons in favor of a committee approach… [https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/02/report-democrats-dont-want-biden-full-control-nuclear-weapons/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=the-gateway-pundit&utm_campaign=dailyam&utm_content=daily]
Might the Hilary Clinton/Joe Biden war-hawks start a nuclear World War III with Russia?
Pulitzer winner and liberal Glenn Greenwald, who is a co-founder of the Intercept new outlet renowned for its accurate journalism on intelligence, reported Joe "Biden’s top national security advisers and now Biden himself have, with no evidence shown to the public, repeatedly threatened aggressive retaliation against the country with the world’s second-largest nuclear stockpile":
With the Democrats, under Joe Biden, just weeks away from [possibly] assuming control of the White House and the U.S. military and foreign policy that goes along with it, the discourse from them and their media allies about Russia is becoming even more unhinged and dangerous. Moscow’s alleged responsibility for the recently revealed, multi-pronged hack of U.S. Government agencies and various corporate servers is asserted — despite not a shred of evidence, literally, having yet been presented — as not merely proven fact, but as so obviously true that it is off-limits from doubt or questioning.
Any questioning of this claim will be instantly vilified by the Democrats’ extremely militaristic media spokespeople as virtual treason. “Now the president is not just silent on Russia and the hack. He is deliberately running defense for the Kremlin by contradicting his own Secretary of State on Russian responsibility,” pronounced CNN’s national security reporter Jim Sciutto, who last week depicted Trump’s attempted troop withdrawal from Syria and Germany as “ceding territory” and furnishing “gifts” to Putin. More alarmingly, both the rhetoric to describe the hack and the retaliation being threatened are rapidly spiraling out of control.
(along with some Republicans long obsessed with The Russian Threat,
such as Mitt Romney) are casting the latest alleged hack by Moscow in
the most melodramatic terms possible, ensuring that Biden will enter the
White House with tensions sky-high with Russia and facing heavy
pressure to retaliate aggressively. Biden’s top national security
advisers and now Biden himself have, with no evidence shown to the
public, repeatedly threatened aggressive retaliation against the country
with the world’s second-largest nuclear stockpile. [Glenn Greenwald (email@example.com), "With Biden's New Threats, the Russia Discourse is More Reckless and Dangerous Than Ever,"
You’re on the free list for Glenn Greenwald. For the full experience, become a paying subscriber.]
The Global Village Space news outlet apparently asked the question:
Will Biden "presidency risk plunging the world into a catastrophic third world war"?
The news outlet admitted that President Donald Trump has been a peace president:
"Nevertheless, despite the occasional show of force, Trump has shown remarkable restraint during his four-year presidency against the advice of his national security advisers who wanted more proactive engagement of the US military in conflict flashpoints, such as Syria, Iran and Afghanistan, to the point that some generals in the top-brass of the US military even accused him of being Putin’s 'useful idiot.'”
"In addition, despite having to contend with the Bush and Obama [/Bicden] administrations’ legacy of myriad wars and proxy wars across the Middle East region, Trump has even announced a significant drawdown of the US forces from Afghanistan, Syria, Iraq and even the US strategic ally Germany." [https://www.globalvillagespace.com/op-ed-will-biden-presidency-risk-plunging-the-world-into-a-catastrophic-third-world-war/]
The Global Village Space says that deep state war hawks apparently know that a Joe Biden win would risk bringing about a endless wars president and therefore support him despite the possibly of him starting World War III :
"To name a few Trump aides who resigned or were sacked, they include former national security adviser John Bolton, former national security adviser H.R. McMaster, former defense secretary Jim Mattis, former White House chief of staff John Kelly, former director of national intelligence Dan Coats, former Navy secretary Richard Spencer and former chief of staff at the Department of Homeland Security Miles Taylor."
"In fact, scores of former Republican national security officials recently made their preference public that they would vote for Joe Biden instead of Donald Trump against party lines."war
"What does that imply?"
implies that the latent conflict between the deep state and the elected
representatives of the American people has come to a head during the
Trump presidency... "
"... On another occasion, he ruffled more feathers by telling the reporters: 'I’m not saying the military’s in love with me. The soldiers are. The top people in the Pentagon probably aren’t because they want to do nothing but fight wars so all of those wonderful companies that make the bombs and make the planes and make everything else stay happy.'”
"In conclusion, to answer the oft-repeated question as to how the Biden Presidency would look like, how the “Sleepy Joe’s” vice presidency looked like, as Trump often derisively taunts him on social media and in speeches. His presidency would be no different from his uneventful vice presidency."
"Joe Biden is a typical establishment Democrat who would play into the hands of the US national security establishment like Bill Clinton and Barack Obama before him. But considering the backdrop of a New Cold War with Russia, his presidency could risk plunging the world into a catastrophic Third World War." [https://www.globalvillagespace.com/op-ed-will-biden-presidency-risk-plunging-the-world-into-a-catastrophic-third-world-war/]
In 2014, ex-President Barack Obama's former Defense secretary, Robert M. Gates, agreed that Biden was a war hawk according to the Los Angeles Times:
"Gates takes special aim at some of Obama’s top advisors, including Vice President Joe Biden. Biden, he charges, 'has been wrong on nearly every major foreign policy and national security issue over the past four decades.'”
"Obama worried that top Pentagon officers, including Petraeus and Adm. Michael Mullen, then chairman of the Joint Chiefs, were giving him 'the bum’s rush' in pressing for more troops in Afghanistan early in his first term, Gates says. He blamed Biden, among other aides, for that." [https://www.latimes.com/nation/nationnow/la-pn-gates-book-obama-20140107-story.html]
Read more at: https://www.bloombergquint.com/opinion/joe-biden-could-end-up-being-a-wartime-president
Copyright © BloombergQuint
On August 31, Bloomberg's Niall Ferguson said that endless wars Biden could start "World War III":
"If there is one man I can imagine... turning Cold War II into World War III, it is the self-anointed heir of FDR, Joseph Robinette Biden." [https://www.bloombergquint.com/opinion/joe-biden-could-end-up-being-a-wartime-president]
In 2020, Biden is threatening war with Russia like his collaborator "Hillary Clinton threaten[ed] war with Russia" in 2016. [http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/09/wikileaks-hillary-clinton-threatens-war-russian-media-wont-even-report-video/]
Is 2020 war hawk Biden a replay of 2016 war hawk Clinton on starting World War III?
If Donald Trump had not won the presidential in 2016, was Clinton thinking of starting World War III?
Does Hilary's collaborator Biden want to do in 2021 what Clinton couldn't do in 2017 if he can by the massive voter fraud Biden Steal illegally and fraudulently assume office and become an Anti-President or Fake President?
In 2016, liberal Green Party candidate Jill Stein said:
'Mikhail Gorbachev, who was the prime minister of the Soviet Union during the Cold War, saying that the threat of nuclear war is hotter now than it has ever been in all of history, you’ve got to take that pretty seriously. And when you have Hillary Clinton then beating the war drums against Russia, and essentially saLeupp, that if she’s elected that we will declare war on Russia.'"[http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-26/fact-check-trump-right-clinton-might-cause-ww3]
The British International Business Times UK reported that Hillary
Clinton, on August 31, 2016 at the American Legion National Conference, said:
"As President, I will make it clear that the United States will treat cyberattacks just like any other attack. We will be ready with serious political, economic, and military responses.'" [http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/clinton-us-should-use-military-response-fight-cyberattacks-russia-china-1579187]
The U.S. mainstream media with few exceptions didn't report, and in fact covered-up, Hillary's threat to start a war with Russia over the Wikileaks exposure of the Clintons corruption which she alleges is from Russian intelligence.
Tufts University professor of History Gary Leupp, who is no friend of Trump, in Counterpunch.org which has Ralph Nader as a contributor, says the "corporate media" is covering up Clinton's extreme hawkish war record and says she has "all but declared war on Syria." Leupp said:
"Clinton’s policies are in contrast highly predictable on the basis of her record and recent public pronouncements...[s]he has all but declared war on Syria...Trump...maybe citing the Jeff Sachs quote about her supporting every war proposed by the military or CIA...could win. However frightening that might be, would a Clinton victory be less frightening?"[http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/05/03/hillary-clintons-foreign-policy-resume-what-the-record-shows/]
As Counterpunch.org Paul Street said in agreement with Leupp, "Clinton is the greater evil when it comes to World War III."
Trump made the statement that Hillary's Clinton's no-fly zone policy over Syria could lead to WWW III.
Is that fiction or fact?
Fact check on Clinton's Syria policy as leading to war with Russia:
Zero hedge.com/news reported on :
"The Washington Post points out that a vote for Clinton is a vote for escalating military confrontation in Syria and elsewhere:
The Republicans and Democrats who make up the foreign policy elite are laying the groundwork for a more assertive American foreign policy, via a flurry of reports shaped by officials who are likely to play senior roles in a potential Clinton White House.
The studies, which reflect Clinton’s stated views, break most forcefully with Obama on Syria .... call[ing] for stepped-up military action to deter President Bashar al-Assad’s regime and Russian forces in Syria.
Most of the studies propose limited American airstrikes with cruise missiles to punish Assad ....
Last year, Obama dismissed calls for a no-fly zone in northwestern Syria — a position advocated by Clinton — as 'half-baked.'
Even pinprick cruise-missile strikes designed to hobble the Syrian air force or punish Assad would risk a direct confrontation with Russian forces."[http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-26/fact-check-trump-right-clinton-might-cause-ww3]
"'The most liberal presidential candidate still running – Green Party candidate Jill Stein – says:
"Under Hillary Clinton, we could very quickly slide into NUCLEAR WAR with her declared policy in Syria." '
Even Hillary Clinton admitted her Syrian policy would "kill a lot of Syrians" according to the British BBC News:Hillary Clinton wants to start an air war with Russia. Let’s be clear: That’s what a no-fly zone means. It is tantamount to a declaration of war against Russia.
The most likely nuclear threat right now is with Russia. There’s no doubt about that. When you have Mikhail Gorbachev, who was the prime minister of the Soviet Union during the Cold War, saying that the threat of nuclear war is hotter now than it has ever been in all of history, you’ve got to take that pretty seriously. And when you have Hillary Clinton then beating the war drums against Russia, and essentially saying that if she’s elected that we will declare war on Russia.'"[http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-26/fact-check-trump-right-clinton-might-cause-ww3]
"But in a 2013 speech to Wall Street firm Goldman Sachs, Mrs Clinton said establishing a no-fly zone would 'kill a lot of Syrians', according to a transcript disclosed by Wikileaks."[http://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37766786]
On October 26, 2016, the BBC News reported that the highest-ranking military officer in the US armed forces, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Marine Dunford, told the Senate Arms Services Committee:
"Right now, senator, for us to control all of the airspace in Syria it would require us to go to war, against Syria and Russia." [http://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37766786]
of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt
the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church
in such a situation:
"[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him, or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See."
(The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)
Saint Robert Bellarmine, also, said "the Pope heretic is not deposed ipso facto, but must be declared deposed by the Church."
- "If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?": http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2020/12/if-francis-is-heretic-what-should.html
- "Could Francis be a Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?": http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2019/03/could-francis-be-antipope-even-though.html
- LifeSiteNews, "Confusion explodes as Pope Francis throws magisterial
weight behind communion for adulterers," December 4, 2017:
The AAS guidelines explicitly allows "sexually active adulterous couples facing 'complex circumstances' to 'access the sacraments of Reconciliation and the Eucharist.'"
- On February 2018, in Rorate Caeli, Catholic theologian Dr. John Lamont:
"The AAS statement... establishes that Pope Francis in Amoris Laetitia has affirmed propositions that are heretical in the strict sense."
- On December 2, 2017, Bishop Rene Gracida:
"Francis' heterodoxy is now official. He has published his letter to the Argentina bishops in Acta Apostlica Series making those letters magisterial documents."
Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church by the bishops by the grace of God.
- Intel Cryptanalyst-Mathematician on Biden Steal: "212Million Registered Voters & 66.2% Voting,140.344 M Voted...Trump got 74 M, that leaves only 66.344 M for Biden" [http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/intel-cryptanalyst-mathematician-on.html?m=1]
- Will US be Venezuela?: Ex-CIA Official told Epoch Times "Chávez started to Focus on [Smartmatic] Voting Machines to Ensure Victory as early as 2003": http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/will-us-be-venezuela-ex-cia-official.html