Skip to main content

"Constitutional Travesty": Pennsylvania Supreme Court dismisses Voter Fraud Lawsuit so now going to SCOTUS which was "not Unexpected"

MARK LEVIN: "The state’s legislature determine how to select their elections. Is that what the [Constitution section] means?"

KEN STARR: "That’s exactly what it means. It got lost in the Pennsylvania shuffle. The founding generation sitting in Philadelphia undoubtedly thought, “Well, should we have the state Supreme Court make the determination?” No, we want … a very democratic with a small “d” approach. We want the legislatures, those closest to the people, the state legislatures, they’re the bosses, not the governor. And what happened in Pennsylvania over these recent weeks is a constitutional travesty." - Mark Levin Show

Gateway Pundit reported that the "Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Saturday evening reversed a lower court’s block on certifying the state’s elections issued Friday night, dismissing with prejudice a lawsuit brought by Republican candidates for the U.S. House of Representatives that sought to have the results nullified over constitutional concerns." 

A "lead plaintiff... in the case... Rep. Sean Parnell" said "This was not unexpected" which means the plaintiffs knew the liberal Pennsylvania Supreme Court was apparently expected to dismiss with the expectation that the case was eventually going to end up in the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS).[https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/pennsylvania-supreme-court-tosses-gop-lawsuit-absentee-ballots-lifts-block-certification-elect]

The Editor-in-Chief of @UncoverDC Tracy Beanz reported that the United States Supreme Court "will not take kindly [to the] IMO" or opinion of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court which did not apparently address the constitutional points of the case:

Replying to@tracybeanz
 
They are basically saying that Parnell should have filed this when the SC ruled 77- not now after the election. That’s why they dismissed. The SCOTUS will not take kindly IMO [https://twitter.com/tracybeanz/status/1332830883620003844]
 
Earlier this month, constitution expert Kenneth Starr, on the Mark Levin Show, said "what happened in Pennsylvania over these recent weeks is a constitutional travesty." (The Oxford Dictionary defines travesty as "A false, absurd, or distorted representation of something"):

MARK LEVIN: The state’s legislature determine how to select their elections. Is that what the [Constitution section] means?

KEN STARR: That’s exactly what it means. It got lost in the Pennsylvania shuffle. The founding generation sitting in Philadelphia undoubtedly thought, “Well, should we have the state Supreme Court make the determination?” No, we want … a very democratic with a small “d” approach. We want the legislatures, those closest to the people, the state legislatures, they’re the bosses, not the governor. And what happened in Pennsylvania over these recent weeks is a constitutional travesty. Governor Wolf tries to get his reforms, his vision, as he was entitled to do, through the legislature of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. He failed. He then goes to the state Supreme Court, which by a divided vote, accepted the substance of what Governor Wolf was doing, and then added thereon nooks and crannies as well. [https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2020/11/09/ken-starr-pennsylvania-mail-in-ballot-extension-a-constitutional-travesty/, https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/travesty and https://nonvenipacem.com/2020/11/10/ken-starr-pa-mail-in-ballot-extension-a-constitutional-travesty/]

"Former United States circuit judge" as well as "39th solicitor general of the United States" Starr was the "independent counsel while Bill Clinton was U.S. president. Starr was initially appointed to investigate the suicide of deputy White House counsel Vince Foster and the Whitewater real estate investments of Bill Clinton."[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ken_Starr]

Newsweek reported that Starr who is "a professor of constitutional law at Baylor University" said "to count every vote may be a crime" because it is "illegal" and "unconstitutional":

"Former U.S. Circuit Judge Kenneth Starr told Fox News host Mark Levin that the Pennsylvania state Supreme Court and Governor Tom Wolf made an "unconstitutional decision," claiming many of the votes counted were "illegal."

Starr, who rose to national prominence in the 1990s prosecuting former President Bill Clinton, told Levin Sunday night that Pennsylvania's three-day extension for mail-in ballots was a "constitutional travesty." Levin and Starr both questioned the integrity of Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito and the state Supreme Court for allowing an emergency order Friday in which every county had to segregate and secure ballots received after 8 p.m. on Election Day. The order did not prevent election workers from continuing to count the ballots, which Starr claimed were "illegal." [https://www.newsweek.com/ken-starr-says-count-every-vote-may-crime-blasts-pennsylvania-governor-supreme-court-1545892 and https://ballotpedia.org/Kenneth_Starr]

On a final note, constitutional attorney Robert Barnes explains why the Pennsylvania Supreme Court dismissed case is going to SCOTUS:

Those claiming SCOTUS could never take up PA state court case may want to re-read Bush v. Gore. That was a state court case, interpreting state law. Supreme Court held a Presidential election implicates issues of federal law, vesting it w/ jurisdiction. [https://twitter.com/Barnes_Law/status/1332907644340690944]

Pray an Our Father now for the grace to know God's Will and to do it.

Pray an Our Father now for President Donald Trump, the legal teams including Sidney Powell and justice in the United States of America.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Note: Please put your family, the United States of America, President Donald Trump and the Trump legal team as the intentions in the following Prayer of Command:

Prayer of Command

In His Name and by the power of His Cross and Blood, I ask Jesus to bind any evil spirits, forces and powers of the earth, air, fire, or water, of the netherworld and the satanic forces of nature.  By the power of the Holy Spirit and by His authority, I ask Jesus Christ to break any curses, hexes, or spells and send them back to where they came from, if it be His Holy Will.  I beseech Thee Lord Jesus to protect us by pouring Thy Precious Blood on us (my family, etc.), which Thou hast shed for us and I ask Thee to command that any departing spirits leave quietly, without disturbance, and go straight to Thy Cross to dispose of as Thou sees fit.  I ask Thee to bind any demonic interaction, interplay, or communications.  I place N. (Person, place or thing) under the protection of the Blood of Jesus Christ which He shed for us. Amen
 
Please pray this prayer everyday for President Trump form Bishop Rene Gracida:

A Prayer for Deliverance Of President Donald Trump from Enemies

Based on A Psalm of David.

Contend, O Lord, with those who contend with President Donald Trump;

    fight against those who fight against him!

Take hold of shield and buckler,

    and rise for his help!

Draw the spear and javelin

    against his pursuers!

Say to his soul,

    “I am your deliverance!”

Let them be put to shame and dishonor

    who seek after his life!

Let them be turned back and confounded

    who devise evil against him!

Let them be like chaff before the wind,

    with the angel of the Lord driving them on!

Let their way be dark and slippery,

    with the angel of the Lord pursuing them!

For without cause they hid their net for him;

    without cause they dug a pit[a] for his life.

Let ruin come upon them unawares!

And let the net which they hid ensnare them;

    let them fall therein to ruin!

Then his soul shall rejoice in the Lord,

    exulting in his deliverance.

10 

All his bones shall say,

    “O Lord, who is like thee,

thou who delivers the weak

    from those who are too strong for him,

    the weak and needy from him who despoils him?”

11 

Malicious witnesses rise up;

    they accuse him of things that he knows not.

12 

They requite him evil for good.

15 

But at his stumbling they gathered in glee,

    they gathered together against him;

cripples whom he knew not

    slandered him without ceasing;

16 

they impiously mocked more and more,[c]

    gnashing at him with their teeth.

17 

How long, O Lord, wilt thou look on?

    Rescue him from the ravages

    from the lions!

18 

Then I will thank thee in the great congregation;

    in the mighty throng I will praise thee.

19 

Let not those rejoice over him

    who are wrongfully his foes,

and let not those wink the eye

    who hate him without cause.

20 

For they do not speak peace,

    but against those who are quiet in the land

    they conceive words of deceit.

21 

They open wide their mouths against him;

    they say, “Aha, Aha!

    our eyes have seen it!”

22 

Thou hast seen, O Lord; be not silent!

    O Lord, be not far from him!

23 

Bestir thyself, and awake for his right,

    for his cause, my God and my Lord!

24 

Vindicate him, O Lord, my God, according to thy righteousness;

    and let them not rejoice over him!

25 

Let them not say to themselves,

    “Aha, we have our heart’s desire!”

Let them not say, “We have swallowed him up.”

26 

Let them be put to shame and confusion altogether

    who rejoice at his calamity!

Let them be clothed with shame and dishonor

    who magnify themselves against him!

27 

Let those who desire his vindication

    shout for joy and be glad,

    and say evermore,

“Great is the Lord,

    who delights in the welfare of his servant!”

28 

Then my tongue shall tell of thy righteousness

    and of thy praise all the day long.

– Bishop Rene Henry Gracida

 

 

aaa

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Francis teaches HERESY," now, the question is will he do a Skojec & a Schneider Cop Out

    Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation: "[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic , he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him , or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See." (The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306) Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Pope Francis teaches HERESY: Pope Pius XII condemned the heresy of Francis": Pope Francis on Feb 2 2022, taught, "that in Christ no one can ever truly separate us from those we love because the bond is an existential bond, a strong bond that is in our very nature...who have denied the faith, who are apostates." Pope Pius XII taught the exact opposite when he wrote of those: "who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or b

Wernz-Vidal: "One cannot consider as Schismatics those who Refuse to Obey the Roman Pontiff because they would hold his person Suspect or, because of Widespread Rumors, Doubtfully Elected"

    Pope Francis is tottering on the precipice of Hell. None of this means he isn't the pope, and such talk among the laity is scandalous in its own right. Not a single cardinal in that 2013 conclave has come out and said the election was rigged and Bergoglio isn't the pope, that he is in fact an anti-pope . If he is, a future pope can declare that, when Jorge Bergoglio will no longer be a pope. But if the very men gathered in conclave haven't made that public accusation,  anyone who is suggesting that better take into account that they too will have to give an account of themselves to Almighty God when they die . Such talk adds to the scandal of the "little ones," the simple, even potential converts, who, when they hear big-mouth Catholics on social media saying he's not really the pope, draw back from approaching the Church. Do any of us desire to stand in front Our Blessed Lord as the Supreme Judge and explain why, in our desire for more c

The Nuremberg Trial-like Excuse which Cardinal Burke has so Staggeringly, so Stereotypically Proffered on the Promised “Formal Correction”

Does Cardinal Burke think Francis is an antipope? On at least five occasions, Cardinal Burke has rejected the magisterial nature of official papal teaching (in one case, pre-emptively dismissing a hypothetical official teaching of the Magisterium): Cardinal Burke has rejected the official teaching of Pope Francis in the new Apostolic Constitution Episcopalis Communio concerning the possibility that a pope can raise the final synodal document to the level of ordinary magisterium, if the pope chooses. (We covered the Episcopalis Communio here .) The whole apostolic constitution on the Synod is problematic. … This idea that either the Pope on his own or the Synod together with the Pope can create some new Magisterium [i.e. a new teaching of the ordinary Magisterium], is simply false. The Synod is a consultative body, to help the Pope to see how best to present the Church’s teaching in time. It’s not able to create ordinary Magisterium. As a canon lawyer, Cardinal Burk