Skip to main content

The Biden/Wallace Debating Team needs to Apologize for Slandering Proud Boys "International Chairman" Afro-Latino Enrique Tarrio

The Proud Boys came under the microscope after President Trump refused during Tuesday’s presidential debate to condemn them as white supremacists, saying, “Proud Boys — stand back and stand by,” prompting accusations that he was supporting virulent racists.

Mr. Reilly said that about 10% to 20% of Proud Boys activists are people of color, a diverse racial composition that is “extremely well-known in law enforcement,” based on his research. - Black professor Wilfred Reilly in the Washington Times

President Donald Trump did well in his debate with the Joe Biden/Democrat Chris Wallace debating team who together treated him contemptuously. The disgraceful Biden over and over again despicably name-called the president with invective insults such as "clown" and "racist" with Wallace at times mockingly laughing along with him. 

It is obvious that Biden and Wallace were a debating team against Trump. Wallace's best debating line of the night was pretending that he wasn't debating Trump: 

"You're debating him, not me!" [trib.al/oz2Khts]

The only time in the debate when the Wallace/Biden debating team was left silent and wordless was when President Trump asked the two to name one police law enforcement organization that supported their ticket's apparent backhanded support of violent Black Live Matters rioting and demands for defunding the police.

Moreover, the South Florida Sun-Sentinel showed how the Wallace/Biden debating team worked together:

Wallace said Trump had criticized Biden for not calling out Antifa and other left-wing extremist groups for violence in recent protests across the country. Then he asked Trump to condemn white supremacists and militia groups and say that “they need to stand down and not add to the violence in a number of these cities.”

President Trump said he was “willing to do that” before pivoting to respond that the violence in cities across the country is not the fault of those groups. “Almost everything I see is from the left wing, not from the right wing.” Later in the exchange, when pressed to make a statement, Trump asked: “Who would you like me to condemn?"

Biden then chimed in, “Proud Boys." 

“Proud Boys, stand back and stand by," Trump said. [https://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/fl-ne-proud-boys-react-to-trump-20200930-wg3y74dzhjbsffb4oc7w6pwt64-story.html]

Afro-Latino Enrique Tarrio on Parler said he is the chairman of the Proud Boys according to the Sun-Sentinel.

Black Cuban Tarrio, who isn't a " white supremacist," said:

Although I am excited about our mention on the debate stage...

I am not taking this as a direct endorsement from the President. He did an excellent job and was asked a VERY pointed question. The question was in reference to WHITE SUPREMACY...which we are not.
 

— Enrique Tarrio (@enrique_tarrio) September 30, 2020 [https://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/fl-ne-proud-boys-react-to-trump-20200930-wg3y74dzhjbsffb4oc7w6pwt64-story.html]

The Washington Times reported that the Biden/Wallace debating team simply lied:

[A] prominent Black professor at a historically Black university... Wilfred Reilly, associate professor of political science at Kentucky State University, said Wednesday that “the Proud Boys aren’t white supremacists,” describing the right-wing group’s beliefs as “Western chauvinist” and noting that their international chairman, Enrique Tarrio, is Black.

“Gotta say: the Proud Boys aren’t white supremacists,” tweeted Mr. Reilly...

The Proud Boys came under the microscope after President Trump refused during Tuesday’s presidential debate to condemn them as white supremacists, saying, “Proud Boys — stand back and stand by,” prompting accusations that he was supporting virulent racists.

Mr. Reilly said that about 10% to 20% of Proud Boys activists are people of color, a diverse racial composition that is “extremely well-known in law enforcement,” based on his research.

“Enrique Tarrio, their overall leader, is a Black Cuban dude. The Proud Boys explicitly say they’re not racist,” Mr. Reilly told The Washington Times. “They are an openly right-leaning group and they’ll openly fight you — they don’t deny any of this — but saying they’re White supremacist: If you’re talking about a group of people more than 10% people of color and headed by an Afro-Latino guy, that doesn’t make sense.” [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/sep/30/wilfred-reilly-insists-proud-boys-arent-white-supr/] 

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Mass and the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of the Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of the Mary. 

Please, pray an Our Father now for President Trump and our country now because this is the important fork in the road for the United States. Please, keep this intentions in your prayers.


 

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more