Skip to main content

President Trump does well in Unexpected Debate with Chris Wallace

 https://babylonbee.com/img/articles/article-7113-1.jpg"Some are questioning Chris Wallace's neutrality in the debate tonight. Many say he constantly interrupted Trump and refused to challenge Biden. But others are pointing to more obvious clues, like the giant foam finger he wore that read 'Biden 2020.'" [https://babylonbee.com/news/chris-wallace-moderates-debate-while-wearing-giant-foam-finger-reading-biden-2020] 

President Donald Trump did well in his unexpected debate with Chris Wallace. It appears that Joe Biden, also, with what some people suspect was the assistance of an earphone did better than expected with the help of his debate partner Wallace. 

It appears that the liberal media thinks that the Wallace/Biden debating team held their own against the president.

Wallace's best line of the night was pretending that he wasn't debating Trump: 

"'You're debating him, not me!' Chris Wallace caught in middle of Trump-Biden debate" [trib.al/oz2Khts] 

The only time in the debate when the Wallace/Biden debating team was left silent and wordless was when President Trump asked the two to name one police law enforcement organization that supported their ticket's apparent backhanded support of violent Black Live Matters rioting and demands for defunding the police.

There are now rumor that Biden will replace Kamala Harris with Wallace as his running mate. 

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Mass and the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

 


Comments

The Bear said…
Trump should have given Biden more uninterrupted speaking time to get confused and ramble as he started to do a couple of times, especially on one question about mail in ballots which was just a word salad. Napoleon said “Never interrupt the enemy when he is making a mistake.” Biden was never given a chance to come apart like a cheap suitcase. Biden was weak and vacuous, but probably would have really messed up if given a chance. I thought the question about condemning white supremacy was unfairly vague—everyone who is not a card-carrying member of BLM is in that category for Democrats and media—but Trump should not have tried to nuance it. It was an easy “yes,” then shut up. We all knew what to expect from Trump. We all tuned into to watch Biden tell the Corn Pop story. Trump never let us see that. Substantively, Biden was weak. In terms of personality, Trump steamrollered a weak opponent. But Trump is President of the United States. A little more decorum would not have made a difference as far as changing minds, but I would have been more comfortable with that, too. Knowing when you’ve made your point and shutting up was harder for a me as a lawyer to learn than how to make your point. I’ll never forget the time a judge told me, “Don’t keep arguing when you’ve won.”
5:46 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more