Skip to main content

Is Gay Activist Upcoming Cardinal Gregory "a Disgrace"?

In June, he Gateway Pundit called Francis's newest upcoming American cardinal, Wilton Gregory, a "disgrace" for being hypocritical:

"Washington DC Archbishop Wilton Gregory released a statement on Tuesday lashing out at the President of the United States for visiting the John Paul II National Shrine."

"Clueless Archbishop Gregory lectured President Trump on “defending the rights of all people even those with whom we might disagree” while at the same time attacking him for visiting a Catholic Shrine."

"What a disgrace." 
[https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/06/disgusting-dc-archbishop-gregory-lashes-president-trump-visiting-john-paul-ii-shrine-lies-teargas-attacks-protesters/]

Is Gregory not just "a disgrace" for being a hypocrite with President Donald Trump, but for being a bishop who is a gay activist?  

The May 13, 2018 Catholic Standard reported that the so-called "conservative" Bishop Robert Barron (who is a "friend" of gay activist Fr. James Martin) is a collaborator of gay activist Gregory who apparently is and was part the gay bishops network.
(Twitter, Fr. James Martin, April 30, 2012, Martin: "Here is my friend Fr. Robert Barron")

Barron's "first spiritual director when he was a seminarian for the [Bernardin] Archdiocese of Chicago" and "friend" is reportedly a homosexual and gay activist Wilton Gregory.

The Standard, also, says he was ordained by the reportedly homosexual and gay activist Cardinal Joseph Bernardin. The article shows Barron giddy in praise of the two gay activists:

"'Cardinal Bernardin's qualities... have shaped the ministry of Archbishop Gregory'... Barron said that his friend Archbishop Gregory is a excellent choice to lead Archdiocese of Washington. 'I can't think of anyone better'... in the wake of the abuse crisis, he said."
(Catholic Standard, "Friends remember how Archbishop Gregory's Chicago years shaped his ministry," May 13, 2019)

Barron, however, doesn't disclose in his praise of Gregory and Bernardin that they were apparently part of "a network of gay priests and bishops" in Chicago according to whistleblowers.

Nor does he explain how a gay activist archbishop is a "excellent choice" to stop gay predators who are responsible for almost all the priest sex abuse cases.

Is Gregory a "homosexual"?

Here is the evidence:

The ex-priest and psychotherapist Richard Sipes, who outed ex-cardinal Theodore McCarrick as a homosexual sexual predator, in 2006 reportedly outed as a "homosexual" Francis's newly appointed archbishop of Washington, D.C. Wilton Gregory.
(AWRSipes.com, "Sexual Orientation & American Roman Catholic Bishops," August 1, 2006 and Catholic News Agency, "Archbishop Gregory asked to lead Washington archdiocese," March 28, 2019)
[http://www.awrsipe.com/Click_and_Learn/2006-08-01-Sexual_Orientation-4.html]

It is well-known that Gregory has a gay agenda who according to a LifeSiteNews report on August 14, 2018 has appointed a " pro-gay priest as a 'spiritual guide' for abuse victims" despite the fact that the 2011 John Jay report found 81 percent of abuse victims were male:

"The layperson expressed distress to LifeSiteNews that the archdiocese would place someone that oversees a dissident homosexual-affirming parish in the role of spiritual director for victims of clerical sexual abuse when much of the abuse appears to be homosexually motivated."

“'This is very concerning,' the Catholic said about [Gregory's] Gracz... appointment. “Isn’t this what we’re talking about with McCarrick?”
[https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/us-archbishop-utilizes-pro-gay-priest-as-spiritual-guide-for-clerical-sex-a]
      
Joe Sacerdo reported Gregory's gay lobby connections and beginnings :

"Joseph Kellenyi... once a seminarian at Mundelein in the Chicago area... said... '[Cardinal Joseph] Bernardin fostered and promoted a network of gay priests and bishops... they protected each other, covered up each other's 'mistakes,'... Bishop Gregory is well aware that he is where he is today because a gay Cardinal [Bernardin] took a special interest in him at a young age. Bishop Gregory benefited directly from a combination of homosexuality and power in the Church. This alone would explain his waffling over the gay priest problem.'"
(BryanHehirExposed.wordpress.com, "Fr. Bryan Hehir, Bishop Kicanas, and Cardinal Bernardin," 10 years ago) [https://bryanhehirexposed.wordpress.com/2010/11/20/fr-bryan-hehir-bishop-kicanas-and-cardinal-bernardin/]

It is a scandal that Francis according to whistleblower Sipe has appointed a "homosexual" bishop to Washington, D.C. and that Barron praised his choice.

The scandal gets worst when it is well-known that the Francis appointed bishop has a gay agenda and gay lobby history when 81 percent of abuse victims were males abused by gay predator priests.

Bizarrely and circumstantially in his gay agenda episcopal behavior, Gregory is exhibiting a behavior that Francis is known to practice.

Francis is known to promote homosexual perverts such as Theodore McCarrick to positions of higher responsibility.

The latest example is his personal friend Archbishop Gustavo Zanchetta who was promoted to a high Vatican position even though according to Argentinean Church documents he is allegedly a gay pervert.

Gregory has acted like Francis in at least one of his promotions. The one example that is explicitly known is when Gregory's priest "Fr. Juan Areiza, got entangled in a gay scandal exposed by CBS Atlanta." This same gay pervert priest was later promoted to be "pastor of St. Pius... by Wilton Gregory."
(The American Spectator, "FrancisChurch goes from  Scandal to Scandal," November 4, 2018)

It would be laughable if it was wasn't scandalous that Barron claims that gay activists Gregory and Francis, who are promoters of gay perverts as well as gay activists, can or might do anything to end the "network of gay priests and bishops."

Read the Barron quote and weep as you laugh at its ridiculousness:

"I would suggest... the Holy Father [Francis]... form a team [probably with Gregory on the team]... to determine how Archbishop McCarrick managed... to function as a roving ambassador for the [Francis] Church and to have disproportionate influence on the appointment of bishops [even though Francis knew he was a homosexual predator]."
(Word on Fire, "The McCarrick Mess, August 9, 2018)

The questions needs to be asked:

Is the spiritual son of gay activist Gregory Bishop Barron an enabler in the "conservative" wing of the Bernardin/Gregory gay mafia?

Is Gregory not just "a disgrace" for being a hypocrite, but for being a gay activist bishop who is a "homosexal" according ex-priest Sipes?  

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Mass and the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of the Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Francis teaches HERESY," now, the question is will he do a Skojec & a Schneider Cop Out

    Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation: "[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic , he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him , or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See." (The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306) Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Pope Francis teaches HERESY: Pope Pius XII condemned the heresy of Francis": Pope Francis on Feb 2 2022, taught, "that in Christ no one can ever truly separate us from those we love because the bond is an existential bond, a strong bond that is in our very nature...who have denied the faith, who are apostates." Pope Pius XII taught the exact opposite when he wrote of those: "who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or b

The Nuremberg Trial-like Excuse which Cardinal Burke has so Staggeringly, so Stereotypically Proffered on the Promised “Formal Correction”

Does Cardinal Burke think Francis is an antipope? On at least five occasions, Cardinal Burke has rejected the magisterial nature of official papal teaching (in one case, pre-emptively dismissing a hypothetical official teaching of the Magisterium): Cardinal Burke has rejected the official teaching of Pope Francis in the new Apostolic Constitution Episcopalis Communio concerning the possibility that a pope can raise the final synodal document to the level of ordinary magisterium, if the pope chooses. (We covered the Episcopalis Communio here .) The whole apostolic constitution on the Synod is problematic. … This idea that either the Pope on his own or the Synod together with the Pope can create some new Magisterium [i.e. a new teaching of the ordinary Magisterium], is simply false. The Synod is a consultative body, to help the Pope to see how best to present the Church’s teaching in time. It’s not able to create ordinary Magisterium. As a canon lawyer, Cardinal Burk

"The same Globalists who installed Biden... installed the Zelensky regime... [&] those who did not volunteer for this are Literal Human Shields for the Zelensky/Soros government... [if] Trump had survived the election coup in 2020 we would have no Ukraine war"

Above: Ukrainian President Zelensky (2nd from left) and three other men perform a homoerotic skit on Ukrainian television.    What is the Real Agenda of the corrupt Joe & Hunter Biden's Russiagate backing of the Trudeau-like Obama corrupt Ukraine Operatives in their Warmongering Posturing? "If President Trump had survived the election coup in 2020 we would have no Ukraine war (because he respects Russia’s legitimate security interests and wants to disband NATO)." - Scott Lively Constitutional lawyer Scott Lively thinks that the "same globalists who installed Biden... installed the Zelensky regime in Ukraine... [and] those who did not volunteer for this are literal human shields for the Zelensky/Soros government": The use of human shields in warfare of any kind is a horrifying satanic tactic, and, ironically, it is most effective against people who are truly humane. The tactic uses our humanity against us, because we don’t want the innocent t