Skip to main content

Blabber Buzz News: "Secret Service Agent got Suspended... after Shoving... Biden when he Cupped the Agent’s Girlfriend’s Breasts"

"When being interviewed at the time of the happenings, the agent said Biden often roamed the VP house naked in the evening. He was “Stark naked… Weinstein level stuff,” he added, making reference to Harvey Weinstein, a Democratic rapist. “He would mess with every single woman or teen. It was horrible,” the agent said." - Blabber Buzz News

Blabber Buzz News reported that a "Secret Service agent got suspended in 2009 for a week after shoving then-Vice President Joe Biden when he cupped the agent’s girlfriend’s breasts while posing for a photo with him. The altercation escalated so fast, others had to intervene and hold back the agent who was on the verge of hitting Biden, a source who was a Secret Service agent told The Gateway Pundit":

The Secret Service confirmed a report from The Gateway Pundit that involved a sexual incident between a Secret Service agent and Biden, back in 2009.

A Secret Service agent got suspended in 2009 for a week after shoving then-Vice President Joe Biden when he cupped the agent’s girlfriend’s breasts while posing for a photo with him. The altercation escalated so fast, others had to intervene and hold back the agent who was on the verge of hitting Biden, a source who was a Secret Service agent told The Gateway Pundit.

Under anonymity, the agent feared another occurrence alike could be repeated, so they had to cancel the VP Christmas meeting at Biden’s house “because Biden would grope all of our wives and girlfriend’s asses.” The people invited to the party were Navy personnel and agents who protected the Bidens.

The Secret Service failed to respond to an administrative appeal from July, alleging the files related to the incident “had been destroyed due to retention standards.”

In the request made to the Judicial Watch’s FOIA, in May, the Secret Service applied for all the records that served as evidence.

“The records sought shall include, but not be limited to, witness statements, the Agent’s statement, victim’s statement, alleged perpetrator’s statement, incident reports, investigative reports, communications among USSS personnel regarding the incident, and disciplinary records related to the incident for the Agent in question.”

In a July 13, 2020 response to Judicial Watch’s request, it seems the Secret Service confirmed the files indeed existed, asserting “There are no responsive records or documents pertaining to your request in our files,” because “the above mentioned files have been destroyed and no additional information is available.” However, the veracity of the happening was not touched, demonstrating the fact that Biden inappropriately touching the woman’s breasts was true.

In the lawsuit, Judicial Watch wants to prove the Secret Service’s affirmation that it destroyed the proof of the episode.

When being interviewed at the time of the happenings, the agent said Biden often roamed the VP house naked in the evening. He was “Stark naked… Weinstein level stuff,” he added, making reference to Harvey Weinstein, a Democratic rapist. “He would mess with every single woman or teen. It was horrible,” the agent said.

The agent stated having Biden around women would make his teammates anxious. The men on duty sometimes had to stand in front of the female agents like guardians, and in some instances, they even made up excuses in order to distance the women in the group from Biden.

Women in the Navy were their particular concern. The agent said “They weren’t allowed to disobey him at all, but we’d take them away under pretend auspices.” [https://www.blabber.buzz/conservative-news/1004444-full-protection-secret-service-accidentally-deletes-biden-sex-assualt-report?utm_source=c-alrt&utm_medium=c-alrt-email&utm_term=c-alrt-AOL&utm_content=5-8kN9_4nyPdPjyrebZtZadcSMHcoDdp1Vn3dUCTuXVQ.A]

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Mass and the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Francis teaches HERESY," now, the question is will he do a Skojec & a Schneider Cop Out

    Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation: "[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic , he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him , or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See." (The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306) Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Pope Francis teaches HERESY: Pope Pius XII condemned the heresy of Francis": Pope Francis on Feb 2 2022, taught, "that in Christ no one can ever truly separate us from those we love because the bond is an existential bond, a strong bond that is in our very nature...who have denied the faith, who are apostates." Pope Pius XII taught the exact opposite when he wrote of those: "who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or b

Wernz-Vidal: "One cannot consider as Schismatics those who Refuse to Obey the Roman Pontiff because they would hold his person Suspect or, because of Widespread Rumors, Doubtfully Elected"

    Pope Francis is tottering on the precipice of Hell. None of this means he isn't the pope, and such talk among the laity is scandalous in its own right. Not a single cardinal in that 2013 conclave has come out and said the election was rigged and Bergoglio isn't the pope, that he is in fact an anti-pope . If he is, a future pope can declare that, when Jorge Bergoglio will no longer be a pope. But if the very men gathered in conclave haven't made that public accusation,  anyone who is suggesting that better take into account that they too will have to give an account of themselves to Almighty God when they die . Such talk adds to the scandal of the "little ones," the simple, even potential converts, who, when they hear big-mouth Catholics on social media saying he's not really the pope, draw back from approaching the Church. Do any of us desire to stand in front Our Blessed Lord as the Supreme Judge and explain why, in our desire for more c

The Nuremberg Trial-like Excuse which Cardinal Burke has so Staggeringly, so Stereotypically Proffered on the Promised “Formal Correction”

Does Cardinal Burke think Francis is an antipope? On at least five occasions, Cardinal Burke has rejected the magisterial nature of official papal teaching (in one case, pre-emptively dismissing a hypothetical official teaching of the Magisterium): Cardinal Burke has rejected the official teaching of Pope Francis in the new Apostolic Constitution Episcopalis Communio concerning the possibility that a pope can raise the final synodal document to the level of ordinary magisterium, if the pope chooses. (We covered the Episcopalis Communio here .) The whole apostolic constitution on the Synod is problematic. … This idea that either the Pope on his own or the Synod together with the Pope can create some new Magisterium [i.e. a new teaching of the ordinary Magisterium], is simply false. The Synod is a consultative body, to help the Pope to see how best to present the Church’s teaching in time. It’s not able to create ordinary Magisterium. As a canon lawyer, Cardinal Burk