Are Black Lives
Matter, and its media allies promoting racism against Latinos, all non-blacks and even non-Muslim blacks?
The Black
Lives
Matter Karenism has reached a new level of insanity and may be targeting
non-black minorities, non-Muslims as well as whites. A Latino man was
recently fired for "cracking his knuckles" according to the Western
Journal:
The sound of a person cracking his knuckles is almost universally
annoying, but for Emmanuel Cafferty, the habit cost him his job.
Cafferty worked for San Diego Gas and Electric and was driving in his company truck near a Black Lives Matter protest in Poway, California, earlier this month, according to KNSD-TV.
He had his arm dangling from the truck window and was reportedly
cracking his knuckles, unaware that a man who had been following him
snapped a picture and shared it to social media in a since-deleted
tweet, accusing Cafferty of making a “white power” gesture with his
hand.
The organization’s website stresses caution in that interpretation,
however, as the gesture is “entirely innocuous and harmless” in most
contexts.
Moreover, it appears that Sacramento King basketball white announcer
Grant Napear was forced to resign for Twitting "All Lives Matters."
Does this means that the phrase "Black Lives Matter" to the Black Lives
Matter organization and to the leftist politically correct powers that
be that only black lives matter and that Latino, Jewish, Asian, white,
all non-black and all non-Islamic persons lives don't matter?
If this is true then the leftist politically correct powers that be that
promote Black Lives Matter appear to be pushing a type of Black Nazism
that is apparently racist and anti-Semitic.
The Nazis ideological narrative was that since the German race suffered
after World War I that only German lives mattered so they were justified
in killing Jews, Slavs and other races. It appears that the Black Lives
Matter (BLM) ideological narrative is because blacks suffered in the
past that only black lives matter so riots are justified against other
races.
According to the research of The Last Refuge, Black Lives Matters (BLM) is influenced by black supremacist Louis "Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam [who] do not like Latinos":
"The internal racism within the “people of color” coalition was always the inherent problem for Barack Obama, Eric Holder and Tom Perez (Team BLM), because the Nation of Islam and New Black Panther Party absolutely dislike Latinos."
"When Barack Obama attempted outreach to the Latino community he even
changed the language. Gaining Latino support was the reason the DNC
sent out guidance to use the phrase “people of color” instead of 'black'
during media coverage.
Additionally, Obama’s attempted outreach to the
Latino community was always through the illegal alien angle, the
'dreamers'; but Obama never delivered on his fake promises and the PoC
lingo could not help."
"Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam do not like Latinos and/or Hispanics.
The New Black Panthers do not like Latinos and/or Hispanics. These
groups are always in constant conflict. The friendly political
relationship between La Raza and the radical Democrats doesn’t
compensate for this massive divide amid Blacks and Latinos."
"In one way it is still a generational problem. Latinos lean heavily Christian; while the radical NoI and NBPP elements who agreed to align within the BLM movement are heavily influenced by Islam. This is why there are two internal black coalitions. BLM is influenced by Islam, while the AME coalition is Christian."
The BLM network is the center of activist operations and that means Islam is favored.
[Keep your 'people of color', because the BLM prefers 'black. [The
previous remark in this brackets is from The Last Refuge post] ] Hence,
Minneapolis is a good fit for BLM activation because Minneapolis leans
Muslim thanks to the decades long influx of Somali refugees imported by
Bush and Obama."
Jamaican-American Jason D. Hill, who is a professor of philosophy at
DePaul University, wrote an article "My ‘Black Lives Matter’ Problem"
for Commentary Magazine with the subheading "Anti-Semitism" in which he stated:
"The leaders of Black Lives Matter have written a profoundly anti-Israel
(and anti-American) manifesto in which they accuse Israel of “genocide”
and “apartheid.” The manifesto endorses the “Boycott, Divestment,
Sanctions” (BDS) movement and takes the view that the United States
justifies and advances the global war on terror via its alliances with
Israel. This, according to Black Lives Matter, makes the U.S. complicit
in a supposedly genocidal massacre of the Palestinian people... "
"... Israel is the only country I know of that grants citizenship and
land rights to its avowed enemies. What’s more, Israel offered a
Palestinian state to both Yassir Arafat and Mahmoud Abbas and was not
only repeatedly turned down but repaid with the second intifada and the
indiscriminate murder of Israeli citizens. Palestinian intransigence is
forged in the conviction that no deal will be made so long as Jews—any
Jews—occupy the land of Israel. In 2005, Israel unilaterally handed over
its territory in Gaza to the terrorist government Hamas and was, and
still is, rewarded by a daily showering of rockets into Israeli land."
"With its accusations against Israeli Jews, Black Lives Matter
suggests that in their support of Israel, such Jews are complicit in the
unproven crimes of genocide and apartheid. We must remember that
even amid the daily onslaughts of war and terror that Palestinians
inflict on Jews, the Israelis, in a spirit of almost irrational
altruism, take great pains to limit civilian casualties and to ensure
that those caught in a war they did not personally initiate are spared
as much harm as possible... "
"... There is another morally irresponsible claim made by the Black
Lives Matter movement—a claim that should offend any self-respecting
black American citizen. I refer to the movement’s demand that the United
States provide free college education to blacks. On what grounds is
this organization making such a demand? Why free college education for blacks but not for poor whites or for Latino, Asian, or Native-American college students?
What special sociopolitical conditions exist for blacks that do not
hold for other ethnic or racial groups such that blacks deserve to be
exempt from paying college tuition?"
If the above is true then the leftist corporate powers and the media
that promote Black Lives Matter appear to be pushing a type of Black
Islamic Nazism that is apparently racist, anti-Semitic and even pro-slavery for non-Muslim blacks according to the Geller Report News:
Black slavery is rampant in these Muslim-dominated African countries, but no one is talking about it. By: Dr. Charles Jacobs
Today, an estimated 529,000 to 869,000 black men, women and children
are still slaves. They are bought, owned, sold, and traded by Arab and
Muslim masters in five African countries. This statistic estimates those
enslaved in Algeria, Libya, Mauritania, and Sudan. It excludes Nigeria,
for which there are no tangible estimates.
Western human rights organizations and the mainstream media are
practically and painfully silent on this matter. It does not fit with
their focus on Western white sin. Here is a brief survey of this
quasi-taboo topic.
Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as for
the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the
Immaculate of Mary.
Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ? On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace. The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
Comments
To define a movement or to support a movement as "Black" (or white) is gravely sinful and morally repugnant.
All children of God are equal in the eyes of God - therefore "All" lives matter to God, and so also to me.
We are created by God, and protected by the Constitution, only to make morally good and just choices: Without.Regard.To.Race.