Skip to main content

"9,000 American Deaths... by the Coronavirus": "Biggest Hoax of our Lifetime" - Milo

"Biggest hoax of our lifetime." - Milo Yiannopoulos

"Who is, or has been behind the Zika hoax of all time? - Author Sonia Lugo who wrote "The Zika Virus Hoax Burial Site: Puerto Rico's Downtrodden Economy" 

In April, the liberal Organization for World Peace proclaimed: "[A]dvocate for conspiracy theories... Milo Yiannopoulos, suggest[ed] that coronavirus is the 'biggest hoax of our lifetime.'” [https://theowp.org/far-right-activities-during-covid-19/]

It appears that Yiannopoulos may have been right as Blabber Buzz News reports that "the actual rate looks much more like a typical seasonal flu. The media was lying and the economy was almost shut down because of false statements... [Anthony] Fauci... gave fabricated and highly exaggerated mortality rates related to the coronavirus... to persuade President Trump to lock down the entire U.S economy... 'This week the CDC quietly updated the Covid number to admit that only 6% of all the 153,504 deaths recorded actually died from Covid. That’s 9,210 deaths'":

Let's just stop us just stop for a minute, based on the recommendation of two doctors the US shut down the entire economy based on 9,000 American deaths caused entirely by the coronavirus.

We were first to report that the World Health Organization on March 3, 2020 a set off the panic with his highly flawed statement: "While many people globally have built up immunity to seasonal flu strains, COVID-19 is a new virus to which no one has immunity.

That means more people are susceptible to infection, and some will suffer severe disease. Globally, about 3.4% of reported COVID-19 cases have died. By comparison, seasonal flu generally kills far fewer than 1% of those infected."

The WHO leader’s coronavirus death rate number of 3.4% was false

Reports been made, that the current death rate of COVID-19 cases was false and inaccurate, as the actual rate looks much more like a typical seasonal flu. The media was lying and the economy was almost shut down because of false statements.

Doctors Fauci and Birx next gave fabricated and highly exaggerated mortality rates related to the coronavirus:

Dr. Tony Fauci and Dr. Deborah Birx used the Imperial College Model to persuade President Trump to lock down the entire U.S economy.

The forged model predicted 2.2 million American deaths from the coronavirus pandemic. The authors of the Imperial College Model shared their findings with the White House Coronavirus task force in early March.

Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx met afterwards with President Trump privately and tried to convince him to shut down the U.S economy and exterminate the record Trump economy based on this model. But, the fact that Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx were trying to push things around using a false and exaggerated model, almost made the U.S economy to shut down completely.

Today we now have an actual evidence that the WHO, Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx were all wrong. They were just freaking out, instead of calming the storm.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention tried to hide the fact that they used a false model, and silently updated the facts. The new facts show that only 6% of all coronavirus deaths were caused entirely by the virus.

All the other deaths, they failed to mention, were due to the fact that the individuals who were sick, had other health issues along with it who might have made it worse for them.

Also, most of the deaths are very old Americans with co-morbidities.

“This week the CDC quietly updated the Covid number to admit that only 6% of all the 153,504 deaths recorded actually died from Covid. That’s 9,210 deaths. The other 94% had 2-3 other serious illnesses & the overwhelming majority were of very advanced age”. [https://www.blabber.buzz/conservative-news/1000070-numbers-games-cdc-finalizes-corona-death-stats-only-6-actually-died-from-virus?utm_source=c-alrt&utm_medium=c-alrt-email&utm_term=c-alrt-AOL&utm_content=09CIxopn3CTrumEJRSNOL8E0.A]

What might have been Fauci's motives for promoting hysteria for COVID and a previous promotion of the hysteria for the Zika virus?

It is known that the COVID hysteria promoter Fauci has a multi-million to billion dollar "big-money Bill Gates conflict of interest."

On April 4, Your News, which according to Wikipedia "is a weekly BBC News television programme," in the article "[Anthony] Fauci and Birx both have a Big-Money Bill Gates Conflict of Interest" reported:

"Gates has lots of pull in the medical world, he has a multi-million dollar relationship with Dr. [Anthony] Fauci..."

"Coronavirus response team member Dr. Deborah Birx... sits on the board of a group that has received billions from Gates foundation, and Birx reportedly used a disputed Bill Gates-funded model for the White House Coronavirus effort. Gates is a big proponent for a population lockdown scenario for the Coronavirus outbreak."

Moreover, the article revealed that:

"Gates is funding coronavirus vaccine candidates that would compete with Chloroqine, and Dr. Fauci's agency is co-partnered on the project..."

"...Fauci is tight with Bill Gates... Fauci [who is a big promoter of vaccines] hung out with Gates in 2018 at an NIH workshop..."

" ... Gates admitted that he stopped President Trump's planned vaccine safety commission with Robert Kennedy Jr. in the early days of the Trump administration."

In 2016, in The Atlantic there was a Reuters photo of the present constant scene of  Fauci and Dr. Anne Schuchat standing behind the official "The White House" podium making predictions with a virus map behind them.
(The Atlantic, "The Obama Administration's Zika Offensive," April, 12, 2016)

Back in 2016, Fauci hyping as well as making similar predictions about a virus that was "scary" and didn't supposedly need to be "hype[d]" despite the fact that he, his collaborators and the media were hyping it?

Fauci's present coronavirus collaborator Dr. Schuchat was speaking about a virus that was "scary" and didn't need to be "hype[d]" according to NBC News said of the Zika virus:

"'Frankly, this virus is scary enough on its own. You don't have to hype this,' Schuchat warned."
(NBC News, "Doctors say Zika Funding from Congress as some Republicans remain Suspicious, May, 24, 2016)

Note that the article had Schuchat not "saying" the above-mentioned quote, but used the scarier word "warned." How's that for objective journalism?

In this article, NBC News having impartial journalistic integrity and never "hyping" the news also had the a map from "elife, Oxford University and the University of Washington" warning:

" - New Map Finds 2 Billion People at Risk of Zika Virus."

Fauci also having impartial integrity and never "hyping" according to the above article warned:

"The president [Barack Obama] asked for 1.9 billion because we need 1.9 billion... We need it."


How accurate were the Obama administration and its collaborator Fauci's predictions about the "scary" Zika virus that needed $1.9 billion funding because it is was really "scary"?

Puerto Rican author Sonia Lugo who wrote "The Zika Virus Hoax Burial Site: Puerto Rico's Downtrodden Economy" according to her Amazon Description revealed:

"2017, and the projection of 850,000 Zika infections never occurred in Puerto Rico. Up to this day it hasn't reached more than 40,000. Furthermore, the microcephaly [brain damaged new born babies] were practically none... Who is, or has been behind the Zika hoax of all time? What was the real motives? The FBI and the new Trump DOJ Secretary... is urged to investigate the Obama administration and his CDC [Center for Disease Control and Prevention], and former US Health Secretary."
(Kindle edition, Publication date: April 10, 2017)

Also, National Public Radio (NPR) reported in 2017:

"Back in 2015, Brazil reported a horrific surge in birth defects...  "

"Scientists quickly concluded the Zika virus was the culprit... health officials expected another surge in microcephaly cases"

"But that never happened."
(NPR, "Why didn't Zika cause a Surge in Microcephaly in 2016," March 30, 2017)

Remember that author Lugo asked:

"What was the real motives" for "the Zika hoax"?

Stat News reported that pro-life Republicans thought the Obama and Fauci request for almost 2 billion dollars funding might be for killing unborn babies:

"Two Republican lawmakers... could get the [Zika] virus [funding] derailed by battles whether the money could be used for abortion."
(Stat News, "Abortion politics threatens to derail Zika funding in Congress, February 10, 2016)

Why might the so-called non-political scientist Fauci want money to fund abortion?

Everyone knows that Obama is pro-abortion and pro-contraception, but nobody apparently realizes that his collaborator Faucis is a Obama protege on this issues and anti-Catholic according to Buzz Feed News:

"'How do you treat this in a country where 60% of the pregnancies are unintended, where the Catholic Church doesn't want anything to do with terminating a pregnancy [aborting or killing an unborn baby]?' Fauci asked."
(Buzz Feed News, "Zika is a "Potential Disaster' for US Pregnant Women, Tony Fauci Warns," May 9, 2016)

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Mass and the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bishops of Colorado gave an apparent Vaxx "Exemption" Letter & Stated: "Vaccination is Not Morally Obligatory and so Must Be Voluntary"

Today, the bishops of Colorado gave an apparent Vaxx " exemption" letter (21_8_Vaccine_Exemption_CCC_Fin...docx(20KB)) and stated that "Vaccination is Not Morally Obligatory and so Must Be Voluntary":  COLORADO CATHOLIC CONFERENCE 1535 Logan Street | Denver, CO 80203-1913 303-894-8808 | cocatholicconference.org   [Date]   To Whom It May Concern, [Name] is a baptized Catholic seeking a religious exemption from an immunization requirement. This letter explains how the Catholic Church’s teachings may lead individual Catholics, including [name], to decline certain vaccines. The Catholic Church teaches that a person may be required to refuse a medical intervention, including a vaccination, if his or her conscience comes to this judgment. While the Catholic Church does not prohibit the use of most vaccines, and generally encourages them to safeguard personal and public health, the following authoritative Church teachings demonstrate the principled religious

Does Francis's "Right-hand Man" Parra have a "Sexual Predation against Seminarians, Adultery, and even a Deadly Sex Game...[that] 'might even be a Scandal Surpassing that of McCarrick'"?

  Archbishop Edgar Peña Parra with Francis Today, the Call Me Jorge website asked "What could be so important that Francis interrupted his weekly adulation [Audience] session?": Pope gets a phone call during the Audience. Haven’t seen this before. Then he quickly leaves and says he will be back. pic.twitter.com/npCuPzdnxP — The Catholic Traveler (@MountainButorac) August 11, 2021 It was Abp. Mons. Edgar Robinson Peña Parra, Substitute for the Secretariat of State, who was involved in the recent scandal of mismanagement during the acquisition of a € 300 million building in London. Still no word on what the phone call was about . [http://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2021/08/what-could-be-so-important-that-francis.html] Who is Archbishop Edgar Robinson Peña Parra ? Parra according to the Catholic Herald is Francis's "right-hand man"[https://catholicherald.co.uk/roman-curia-the-popes-new-right-hand-man/] In 2019, Life Site News reported that Parra alleged

Might it be Good for all of us & for Francis to Read about the "Gruesome Death of Arius"?

  I have read the letters of your piety , in which you have requested me to make known to you the events of my times relating to myself, and to give an account of that most impious heresy of the Arians , in consequence of which I have endured these sufferings, and also of the manner of the death of Arius . With two out of your three demands I have readily undertaken to comply, and have sent to your Godliness what I wrote to the Monks; from which you will be able to learn my own history as well as that of the heresy . But with respect to the other matter, I mean the death, I debated with myself for a long time, fearing lest any one should suppose that I was exulting in the death of that man. But yet, since a disputation which has taken place among you concerning the heresy , has issued in this question, whether Arius died after previously communicating with the Church ; I therefore was necessarily desirous of giving an account of his death, as thinking that the question woul