Skip to main content

Why might New York, the Northern Italian City of Bergamo & Wuhan be the Epicenters of the Coronvirus?

Why is it that coronavirus male death rates are much larger than the mortality rates of woman?

Why is it that the Francis Vatican (which includes the Vatican Gay Lobby) is so worried about the coronavirus that they are banning the Mass in the Vatican?

Why might northern Italy and specifically the Italian city of Bergamo in northern Italy be the epicenter of the coronavirus in Europe?

Might the following have something to do with it?

Hachette Book Group says all the large cities of Italy have "a vibrant gay community, and even small cities Bergamo... have their own gay associations... Travel magazines regularly rate Italy as the top destination for gay travelers."
(HachetteBookGroup.com, Italy's Gay and Lesbian Culture)

Why is it that New York City is the epicenter of coronavirus in the United States and, also, happens to have the highest population of gays of all American cities according to Wikipedia?

It also appears that the birthplace of the coronavirus might have a "vibrant gay community" like Bergamo according to CNN:

"Thousands of people like Zhang, living with HIV in Wuhan, and the surrounding province Hubei... there are about 20,000 people living with HIV or AIDS in Hubei province, local experts say."
(CNN, " People living with HIV in Wuhan struggle to find medicine during coronavirus outbreak," March 13,2020)

Might this explain why Wuhan was another epicenter for the virus?

Might the scientific information, if it is accurate or correct, below point to the possible answers to the above questions?

On January 14, 2008, Reuters' headline titled "Drug-resistant staph [Stachylococus aureus] found to be passed by gay sex" reported "Sexually active gay men in San Francisco are 13 times more likely to be infected than their heterosexual neighbors."

The NCBI report by MF Morgene said:

"Lipoteichic acid from S. [Stachylococus] aureus increased the susceptibility to coronavirus infection in pigs."
(NCBI, "Staphylococcus aureus colonization and non-influenza respiratory viruses," August 26, 2018)

Moreover, the coronavirus isn't that new especially to the "male homosexual" community.

In 1986, the Journal of Clinical Pathology had an article titled "Enteric coronavirus in symptomless homosexuals" in which it was found that:

"The prevalence of enteric coronavirus in male homosexuals in our study is very striking, and it is interesting that a recent study by Kern in Germany showed that 50% of patients with AIDS were excreting enteric coronavirus whereas no virus particles were found in 18 control homosexuals."

"Although sera are available from our patients, we have not felt ethically justified in retrospectively testing them for HIV antibody without their consent. It would be speculative to suggest any correlation between the finding of coronavirus in homosexuals and either HIV infection or AIDS. We intend to amplify our study and try to determine the importance of enteric coronavirus in this group of patients."
(https://www.ncbi.nim.nih.gov > pmc, Journal of Clinical Pathology, "Enteric coronavirus in symptomless homosexuals," October 1986, T. Riordan, A. Curry and M.N. Bhattacharyya)

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Mass and the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Sacred Heart Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Comments

MEwbank said…
This is stunning and should be publicized everywhere... which it will not be, of course!

Thank you, Mr. Martinez.

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...