Skip to main content

Are the Conservative Catholic Media Jumping off the Coronavirus Hysteria Love Boat?

First it was LifeSiteNews' post with the two California doctors starting a "revolution" against the coronavirus hysteria then First Things joined with the "Coronavirus Reality Check" article.

It looks like the Conservative Catholic media is starting to jump off the Coronavirus Love Boat to the Reality Ship of traditionalists who have been fighting the virus hysteria hoax since February.

They are welcome on the ship.

When Francis traditionalist Chris Ferrera left behind his cohorts in the Francis Trad movement such as Steve Skojec, Tim Gordon and others in the hysteria hoax boat a few weeks ago we welcomed him.

We didn't mind that he wasn't with us when his follow Francis traditionalists such as Skojec, Gordon and others had Twitter lynch mobs attacking Frank Walker and others who refused to climb abroad the hysteria Coronavirus Love Boat.

Strangely, today with follow Francis Trad Taylor Marshall he apparently claimed that the only ones fighting the virus hysteria were secular Trump supporters. Sorry, Mr. Ferrara, but the only ones bringing out the facts about the hoax were a few courageous scientists and scholars with the non-Francis traditionalists such as Walker, Ann Barnhardt, Br. Alexis Bugnolo and others reporting their evidence that the hysteria was a hoax despite the insults.

However, it's true Rush Limbaugh stood against the virus hysteria while nearly all the other Trump supporters ran and hid except for the non-Francis traditionalists who are apparently Trump supporters.

Even as the Catholic conservative media appear to be leaving the Coronavirus Love Boat like rats jumping off a sinking ship, it appears that Ferrara's Francis Trad collaborators such as Skojec, Gordon and others are still claiming that the Coronavirus Love Boat like the Titanic will not sink.

Maybe Ferrara can convince his follow travelers to jump the sinking ship because he believes with all his heart like they do that Fancis is infallibly and definitely the pope because apparently he believes that the Church has never had a pope like Francis who really, really is infallibly and definitely the pope

His former mentor Fr. Nicholas Gruner, Doctors of the Church St. Robert Bellarmine and St. Francis de Sales, Bishop Rene Gracida and even Cardinal Raymond Burke at one time as well as Catholic Church history unfortunately disagree with Ferrara and his cohorts.

However, with the current world tyranny we are happy for him and the Catholic conservatives to join us in the battle to defeat Francis' allies such as the Chinese Communists, the Bill Gates globalists and the Democrat/media cabal.

But, after this battle is over, we will again be fighting you, Skojec, Gordon and all your collaborators and your Francis who you claim is definitely the pope even if he is a antipope or a explicit heretic who can't lose his papacy no matter what Church history says or what St. Bellarmine or St. Francis de Sales taught.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Mass and the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Comments

Alexis Bugnolo said…
Its a standard Leftie tactic to pretend those whom you hate most do not exist.

Very shocking to see this error of Russia, embraced by Ferrara.

You might be interested in some in-depth stats on the whole thing.

https://wmbriggs.com/post/30541/
Dan said…
From day 1, I refused to drink the cool aide.
Fred Martinez said…
Thank you, Mr. Briggs,

It is an honor for you to post a comment on the Catholic Monitor. It goes without saying that I will read your link. Your are one of the great heroes in the coronavirus hysteria tyranny. In my opinion, when the real history books are writing on this episode you should have a chapter for you courage and brilliance. I will pray a decade of the rosary for you and your important work.

In JMJ,

Fred Martinez

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...