Skip to main content

Why are Trads "Wearied" of Fr. Z, Fr. James Martin, Bp. Stika & Francis' Radical Environmentalist Movement?

I like the Dymphna's Road blog am "wearied to my back teeth by [Francis Trad] Father Z." The Dymphna's Road blog explained why so many traditionalists are dropping him:

"In the present day Bishop Stika of Tennessee has told his people that they can only have Communion in the hand and has Tweeted that anyone who creates a scene will be kicked out. He has also Tweeted that angry Catholics have called his office and been insulting. He even accuses people of being mean and threatening to the elderly lady answering the phone at his office. Bishop Stika has said some wild things in the past. He's danced on the razor's edge of heresy and fell over on occasion."




"So considering the source of the accusation why does Father Z. trust  with no reservation what Bishop Stika says and just lambastes  Catholics as being selfish, cruel jackasses. Father Z has disappointed me so many times that I just stopped reading his blog years ago. His great strength is  cooking posts, travelogues, jokes and cozy-come-sit-by-fire-and-bring-your-drink tales and that's okay but it wasn't enough to keep my attention. "Brick by brick" may have been a decent strategy when JPII was alive and even when Benedict was timidly reigning but it stinks like five day old fish now."

"I understand that he believes that traditional Catholics should behave like the French Resistance in WWII : smile, be pleasant, speak softly and don't attract hostile attention so you can secretly act. He'll never stand openly. He'll always smack the sheep around if they get out of line and he'll always encourage us to grin and be loudly thankful when a bishop allows a traditional Mass in the worse neighborhood in his diocese."

 "I'm tired of traditional priests constantly putting traditional Catholics down. I'm tired of feeling like most of the "leaders" of Trad Inc. are really running a managed opposition campaign." [http://dymphnaroad.blogspot.com/2020/05/im-wearied-to-my-back-teeth-by-father-z.html]

It appears that social justice warrior Fr. Z with his over the top attacks on faithful Catholics for the supposed accused action of someone who they claim was a Trad (the accusation put forward by
 a person who equates abortion to climate change) may get more traditionalists to drop him.

He apparently is starting to have more in common with gay activist Fr. James Martin in his attacks on traditionalists and support of radical environmentalist Bishop Stika than with faithful Catholics.

On January 2, Where Peter Is's Mike Lewis joined gay activist Fr. Martin on the radical environmentalist Tony Annett's Twitter thread.

In the immediate Tweet after Martin, the pro-Communion for adulterers Lewis tweeted:

"EWTN *CAUSED* the 'Amoris Debacle.'"

Does this mean that Lewis may like follow traveler radical environmentalist Bishop Rick Stika, also, equates abortion to climate change?

On September 19, 2019 on Twitter, Bishop Rick Stika issued a anti-EWTN Tweet against Raymond Arroyo: 

"Raymond is at it again."

The radical environmentalist Annett on the same Stika Twitter thread responded:

"I wish more bishops would speak out."

On May 1, 2019, Stika on Twitter let it be known that he had joined the radical environmentalist circles when he equated abortion to climate change:

"Climate change is real just as abortion is real."

It appears that Lewis and Stika want to join Francis's radical environmentalist inner circle.

In the Francis Church this appears to be a smart political move as Cardinal George Pell and Cardinal Sean O'Malley can confirm.

Most people don't remember that Cardinal Pell took "the unusual step of criticizing Francis’ groundbreaking environmental encyclical, arguing the Catholic Church has 'no particular expertise in science.'"
[https://religionnews.com/2015/07/17/cardinal-george-pell-takes-swing-pope-francis-environmental-encyclical/ ]

Many people are, also, not aware that Cardinal O'Malley is part of a radical environmentalist Francis inner circle which was probably unhappy with Pell when he criticized Laudato Si.

Was it possible that they might have wanted to "get rid of" Pell as they want to "get rid of"  EWTN's Raymond Arroyo?

Guess who was on the radical environmentalist Annett's Twitter thread five days before his February 17, 2018 Twitter attack on EWTN's Arroyo?

Many think it is Father Antonio Spadaro who retweeted:

"[T]he call for EWTN to be severely censured 'until they get rid of Raymond Arroyo' following coverage of Spadaro speech at Georgetown University."
[https://cal-catholic.com/papal-confidant-calls-for-raymond-arroyos-head/]

If you guessed it was Francis's "mouthpiece" and close collaborator Spadaro who retwitted the Annett attack on EWTN's Arroyo who was on the Twitter thread five days before you are wrong.

It was the apparently radical environmentalist Cardinal O' Malley.

O' Malley on February 12 on the Annett thread said "[E]nvironmental justice and what needs to be done to address this real and compelling challenge."

Others that joined O'Malley on the thread were gay activist Fr. James Martin and radical environmentalist Jeffrey Sachs.

Was O'Malley endorsing Annett's radical environmentalism as well as the "detraction and calmuny" of that Twitter page?

The American Catholic had this to say of, it appears, one of O'Malley's favorite Tweeter pages:

"Anthony Annett['s]... twitter page is especially full of nasty invective. A quick perusal of his twitter page that evidently detraction and calumny are not sins, at least according to Tony, but failure to hue 100% to his environmental policies and/or working for Heritage are."
(The American Catholic, "Will No One Rid Us Of These Turbulent Converts," August 15, 2017)

Twitter friends Annett and Sachs have together written a book on environmentalism called "The Significance of Laudato si." Guess who joined Annett collaborator Sachs at Columbia University for a environmentalist event?:

"Cardinal O’Malley and Dr. Sachs will help us to appreciate the concerns which moved Pope Francis to write the Laudato Si’ and the impact that the Encyclical is having in the political and economic world. This event is organized in collaboration with the Research Cluster on Science and Subjectivity in the Center for Science and Society at Columbia University."
[https://scienceandsociety.columbia.edu/events/setting-out-long-path-renewal-reflections-pope-franciss-encyclical]

Guess which environmentalist associates and Twitter friends of O'Malley joined Francis at a September 28, 2016 Vatican environmentalism event called the "one-day consultation, titled 'Laudato si' and the Path to COP22'"?:

Annett, McCarrick and Sachs (George Soros' "'longtime confidante and collaborator" as well as point man with Francis) were all in the Vatican "one-day consultation" on the environment encyclical probably written, at least in part, by Soros people such as Sachs. ("Sachs acknowledged that... [the encyclical] 'Laudato si made the adoption of both the passage of the ["universal access to abortion"] UN Substantial Development Goals in Sept. 2015 and the Paris Climate Agreement in December 2015 possible.'")
[https://www.ncronline.org/blogs/eco-catholic/paris-agreement-enters-force-focus-turns-making-it-work]
(Sorosfiles.com, by Elizabeth Yore, "The Pope's Boss," August 25, 2016 and Catholic Monitor, "Does Pope Francis Work for Soros & the UN," December 27, 2017)

Guess who wasn't at the Francis environment Vatican event with O'Malley's radical environmentalist associates and Twitter friends?

The anti-radical environmentalist Cardinal Pell wasn't invited. But, he would soon be getting an invitation to a secret trial in Australia.


Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Mass and the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of the Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Comments

Dad29 said…
Re Fr. Z......it's more and more clear to me that he is a radical clericalist. That's partly based on personal experience, and partly on reading his beg-blog regularly.
When I was a new Catholic, Fr. Z seemed the standard of a good Catholic priest. I followed his blog religiously.

After a few years I noticed a pattern to the management of his readers. It was and is a classic form of manipulation and control.

He allows venting to a point, and then he lays down the law and gives his proverbial gold stars to whomever best enunciates his desired behavior controls.

It's pathetically transparent.
Dymphna said…
Thanks!

Popular posts from this blog

Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Francis teaches HERESY," now, the question is will he do a Skojec & a Schneider Cop Out

    Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation: "[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic , he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him , or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See." (The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306) Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Pope Francis teaches HERESY: Pope Pius XII condemned the heresy of Francis": Pope Francis on Feb 2 2022, taught, "that in Christ no one can ever truly separate us from those we love because the bond is an existential bond, a strong bond that is in our very nature...who have denied the faith, who are apostates." Pope Pius XII taught the exact opposite when he wrote of those: "who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or b

Wernz-Vidal: "One cannot consider as Schismatics those who Refuse to Obey the Roman Pontiff because they would hold his person Suspect or, because of Widespread Rumors, Doubtfully Elected"

    Pope Francis is tottering on the precipice of Hell. None of this means he isn't the pope, and such talk among the laity is scandalous in its own right. Not a single cardinal in that 2013 conclave has come out and said the election was rigged and Bergoglio isn't the pope, that he is in fact an anti-pope . If he is, a future pope can declare that, when Jorge Bergoglio will no longer be a pope. But if the very men gathered in conclave haven't made that public accusation,  anyone who is suggesting that better take into account that they too will have to give an account of themselves to Almighty God when they die . Such talk adds to the scandal of the "little ones," the simple, even potential converts, who, when they hear big-mouth Catholics on social media saying he's not really the pope, draw back from approaching the Church. Do any of us desire to stand in front Our Blessed Lord as the Supreme Judge and explain why, in our desire for more c

The Nuremberg Trial-like Excuse which Cardinal Burke has so Staggeringly, so Stereotypically Proffered on the Promised “Formal Correction”

Does Cardinal Burke think Francis is an antipope? On at least five occasions, Cardinal Burke has rejected the magisterial nature of official papal teaching (in one case, pre-emptively dismissing a hypothetical official teaching of the Magisterium): Cardinal Burke has rejected the official teaching of Pope Francis in the new Apostolic Constitution Episcopalis Communio concerning the possibility that a pope can raise the final synodal document to the level of ordinary magisterium, if the pope chooses. (We covered the Episcopalis Communio here .) The whole apostolic constitution on the Synod is problematic. … This idea that either the Pope on his own or the Synod together with the Pope can create some new Magisterium [i.e. a new teaching of the ordinary Magisterium], is simply false. The Synod is a consultative body, to help the Pope to see how best to present the Church’s teaching in time. It’s not able to create ordinary Magisterium. As a canon lawyer, Cardinal Burk