Skip to main content

Formal Correction: Why are Cd. Burke & Francis Trads like the Leashed Dog in the Foghorn Leghorn Cartoon?



https://youtu.be/ocJ1GTnmO-w

In the old Warner Brothers cartoon the rooster Foghorn Leghorn's archenemy George P. Dog was on a leash which meant he could only go as far as the length of the rope leash and had to stop.

Foghorn even painted a line on the ground with a sign reading "Rope Limit" which George P. Dog could never go beyond.

Why are Cardinal Raymond Burke and Francis traditionalists such the Remnant's Michael Matt and Taylor Marshall as well as other Catholic media like Leghorn's archenemy George P. Dog not allowed to go passed the line with the sign that reads "Rope Limit"?

Why is the once talked about Formal Correction of Francis by Burke and the faithful Catholic media now beyond the "Rope Limit"?

Why is even discussing the possibility of a imperfect council and/or a cardinal and bishop investigation into the Francis conclave and Pope Benedict XVI resignation beyond the "Rope Limit"?

Who and/or what has made Cardinal Burke and the faithful Catholic media into George P. Dog with a rope leash and a "Rope Limit."

Who or what controls them?

Why are they forbidden to even give reasoned arguments, instead of straw man agruments that don't counter our stated dissertations or name calling, against Bishop Rene Gracida and Latin language expert Br. Alexis Bugnolo who put forward serious reasoned dissertations from canon law and Pope John Paul II's conclave constitution?

If they really think those who follow Bishop Gracida and Br. Bugnolo are wrong and headed to hell for being in schism from Francis then out of simple charity for our souls they should counter our dissertations and arguments.

If they really believe we are wrong and headed to hell for calling for a formal correction, a St. Francis de Sales/St. Bellarmine imperfect council, a canonical trial and cardinal investigation of the Francis' conclave and refuse to give us real arguments then they apparently have lost the supernatural virtue of charity.

If they really believe what they say then for charity's sake they should attempt to save us from hell for being in schism from Francis:

But, all we hear are straw man agruments that don't counter our stated dissertations, name calling propaganda, silence or the noise of them running away as fast as they can from serious reasoned back and forth argumentation.

Just to give fair warning:

We are not going away.

We are growing.

Soon we will be to be too big to ignore.

As even Francis conservative Michael Voris reported we are becoming the majority of faithful Catholics in Rome. The same thing is happening in the United States and if you can't stop us now we will probably grow to be the majority of faithful Catholics in America.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Mass and the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Comments

Justina said…
What Fred said.
In Their Hearts said…
Dear Mr. Martinez, could I have your email so I can send you a treatise showing how Benedict's resignation is in fact valid, as well as a comment on why not to criticize decent Prelates too harshly? I tried placing it as a comment, but it was too long even after clipping it. I could clip no more without extremely diminishing the message. God bless and Our Lady Protect You always.
Justina said…
Perhaps you could send the treatise to Benedict XVI, along with a note mentioning that validly resigned popes don't get to keep the "spiritual" part of the office for themselves, wear papal white, sign with their papal names, impart papal blessings, and the like. (See two thousand years of Church history on this point.)Also, please let Our Lord know He was totally out of line with the whole overturning tables thing, and calling decent Pharisees "vipers," and all. You could refer Him to Gospel passages about "loving your enemies," that perhaps He wasn't aware of at the time. Then there's UD Gregis, which Catdinal Danneels has openly and publicly stated was violated by the SG Mafia colluding to anoint Bergoglio, casting serious doubt on the validity of theethe regardless of the status of Benedict's resignation. And what about Amoris laetitia Chapter 8? Cardinal Burke has said it either had to be clarified in keeping with Tradition or rejected by the Church as heretical, yet to date neither has happened. Sure sounds like George P. Dog to me.
Dear In Their Hearts,

Before I would consider having an email exchange with you I need your real name and what organization you are associated with. You obviously have never posted a comment here before. Where have you posted before?

I would also like to know why you are "critiiz[ing a] decent [blogger] too harshly." Please, tell me what in the above post was not fair to your "decent Prelates"?

I would love to see your "treatise showing how Benedict's resignation is in fact valid," why Bishop Gracida's call for a formal correction, a St. Francis de Sales/St. Bellarmine imperfect council, a canonical trail and cardinal investigation of the Francis conclave is "too harsh" for your beloved Francis and "Prelates."

Add, what are your views on Communion for adulterers and pagan pachamama worship?

Also, please answer all Justina's above questions.

Finally, if you refuse to identify yourself, please feel free to break up your long "comment on why not to criticize decent [bloggers and] Prelates too harshly" as well as you long scholarly "treatise" into small segments placed one after another below in separate continuous comments as is done on Twitter.

God bless and Our Lady protect you always.
Fr. VF said…
I know a man who refuses to entertain the thought that Bergoglio is not pope. He has convinced himself--therefore--that a heretic CAN be pope. He is therefore about to join the Orthodox Church. My question is: What is this spell that has so many convinced that THE FIXED, INFALLIBLE, CENTRAL truth of Catholicism is that Bergoglio is pope?
Unknown said…
What I've heard most time from many Catholics, where among them are some cincerely good people, is:
1. That he is "universally accepted"(?!)
2. That we deserved such a bad Pope (?!)

Here are the problems that I have with these statements:
He is not accepted by many including me. Which makes them and me an outsider if we are wrong, - or, if we are right, he is not pope.
Even if it was so that he ever was "universally accepted", it is just too obvious that bergoglio is an imposter, a heretic and an apostate.
Who as such cannot be a member of the Church. Let alone the Pope! Even if he ever was legaly and licitly chosen, which, I refuse to believe, has ever happened.
Therefore bergoglio is not a pope.
Therefore bergoglio is an antipope.
Ivan
Alexis Bugnolo said…
Taylor Marshall seems to think that Burke did not sign the Vigano appeal because Lenga and Gracida are on it. But considering Burke's record allowing a man to take vows as a sister, I think it might be because Vigano the whistleblower organized it.

However, a friend of mine contacted the petition organizer and they refused to even talk to me, so I am honored to be the one person that both Vigano and Burke --- Bergoglio is certainly the pope men -- dont want to be associated with.

I sleep soundly in this.
Praypraypray said…
Thanks, Fred.
I just don’t understand
why the correction was never done.
I have a lot of questions, at this time.
Why haven’t the cardinals and bishops asked Francis to denounce and repent from the pachamama worship that he brought to the Vatican? I would have thought that the obvious idolatry, even caught on camera for the world to see, would be enough to make them act or, at the very least, question Francis. They act now as if it never ever happened!
Why can’t they question the subject of the proper present pope? How come they won’t honestly talk on the subject without sidestepping by attacking straw men or attacking the persons bringing up the questions?
Why can’t they get together for an imperfect council?
What or who is holding them back?
If nothing or no one is holding them back,
why won’t they cross the line to get to the truth?
Why are they being silent and still,
while it’s getting worse and worse?
Who in any authority is protecting Christ’s Holy Catholic Church and God’s people?
Where are true shepherds of the Holy Catholic Church?
Thanks again for another thought provoking article, Fred. God bless you and Catholic Monitor and the Holy Catholic Church.

Popular posts from this blog

Bishops of Colorado gave an apparent Vaxx "Exemption" Letter & Stated: "Vaccination is Not Morally Obligatory and so Must Be Voluntary"

Today, the bishops of Colorado gave an apparent Vaxx " exemption" letter (21_8_Vaccine_Exemption_CCC_Fin...docx(20KB)) and stated that "Vaccination is Not Morally Obligatory and so Must Be Voluntary":  COLORADO CATHOLIC CONFERENCE 1535 Logan Street | Denver, CO 80203-1913 303-894-8808 | cocatholicconference.org   [Date]   To Whom It May Concern, [Name] is a baptized Catholic seeking a religious exemption from an immunization requirement. This letter explains how the Catholic Church’s teachings may lead individual Catholics, including [name], to decline certain vaccines. The Catholic Church teaches that a person may be required to refuse a medical intervention, including a vaccination, if his or her conscience comes to this judgment. While the Catholic Church does not prohibit the use of most vaccines, and generally encourages them to safeguard personal and public health, the following authoritative Church teachings demonstrate the principled religious

Does Francis's "Right-hand Man" Parra have a "Sexual Predation against Seminarians, Adultery, and even a Deadly Sex Game...[that] 'might even be a Scandal Surpassing that of McCarrick'"?

  Archbishop Edgar Peña Parra with Francis Today, the Call Me Jorge website asked "What could be so important that Francis interrupted his weekly adulation [Audience] session?": Pope gets a phone call during the Audience. Haven’t seen this before. Then he quickly leaves and says he will be back. pic.twitter.com/npCuPzdnxP — The Catholic Traveler (@MountainButorac) August 11, 2021 It was Abp. Mons. Edgar Robinson Peña Parra, Substitute for the Secretariat of State, who was involved in the recent scandal of mismanagement during the acquisition of a € 300 million building in London. Still no word on what the phone call was about . [http://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2021/08/what-could-be-so-important-that-francis.html] Who is Archbishop Edgar Robinson Peña Parra ? Parra according to the Catholic Herald is Francis's "right-hand man"[https://catholicherald.co.uk/roman-curia-the-popes-new-right-hand-man/] In 2019, Life Site News reported that Parra alleged

Might it be Good for all of us & for Francis to Read about the "Gruesome Death of Arius"?

  I have read the letters of your piety , in which you have requested me to make known to you the events of my times relating to myself, and to give an account of that most impious heresy of the Arians , in consequence of which I have endured these sufferings, and also of the manner of the death of Arius . With two out of your three demands I have readily undertaken to comply, and have sent to your Godliness what I wrote to the Monks; from which you will be able to learn my own history as well as that of the heresy . But with respect to the other matter, I mean the death, I debated with myself for a long time, fearing lest any one should suppose that I was exulting in the death of that man. But yet, since a disputation which has taken place among you concerning the heresy , has issued in this question, whether Arius died after previously communicating with the Church ; I therefore was necessarily desirous of giving an account of his death, as thinking that the question woul