Skip to main content

Rush: "Evidence why the Country Should Never have been Shut Down"

Today, Rush Limbaugh on his show said:

"I want you to listen to this from the Scarf Queen, Dr. Deborah Birx. This is Saturday night. She was on with Judge Jeanine on the Fox News Channel. And the question from Judge Jeanine, “As we test people, we know more and more have it, and we’re learning that the lethality rate,' the mortality rate, the death rate, 'is so much lower than we thought.”

BIRX: "I think we underestimated very early on the number of asymptomatic cases... "

"... RUSH: Wait just a second. This is not some indiscriminate, minor little miscalculation. This may be one of the primary bits of evidence why the country should never have been shut down. Asymptomatic, meaning the number of people who have it and never know it because they do not suffer any symptoms. For those of you, that’s what asymptomatic means. And what this is doing is lowering mortality rate by a huge number, and particularly in certain demographics, like younger people, the mortality rate among that demographic is even less."

"But this was something that, you know, testing, it was hard to reveal. Now they’re starting to figure it out. But it’s just more evidence that the Draconian shutdown has not been nearly as necessary. It has been devastating. We’re looking at unemployment levels to the tune of the Great Depression." [https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2020/05/04/scarf-queen-admits-they-made-a-big-mistake/]

This is a scandal, but an maybe even bigger scandal is that President Donald Trump's two top advisers on the "coronavirus response team" have a multi-million to billion dollar "big-money Bill Gates conflict of interest."

On April 4, Your News, which according to Wikipedia "is a weekly BBC News television programme," in the article "Fauci and Birx both have a Big-Money Bill Gates Conflict of Interest" reported:

"Gates has lots of pull in the medical world, he has a multi-million dollar relationship with Dr. [Anthony] Fauci..."

"Coronavirus response team member Dr. Deborah Birx... sits on the board of a group that has received billions from Gates foundation, and Birx reportedly used a disputed Bill Gates-funded model for the White House Coronavirus effort. Gates is a big proponent for a population lockdown scenario for the Coronavirus outbreak."

The "Birx reportedly used... disputed Bill Gates-funded model" was also apparently used by pro-abortion eugenicist Michael Savage who used the exact same Gates' coronavirus model numbers as space alien believer Mike Adams on the Alex Jones Show in January.

Moreover, as more Catholics are starting to realize that the coronavirus hysteria is as Catholic lawyer and journalist Chris Ferrara said a "monumental fraud," it appears that the pro-lockdown One Peter Five publisher Steve Skojec who promotes banning Masses in wishing to continue the fraud has hitched his wagon and crumbing credibility to pro-abortion eugenicist Savage's apparent use of Bill Gates' coronavirus model numbers.
(Michael Savage.com, "Savage: No Easy Choice in Abortion Debate" & Mere Orthodoxy, "A lesson in Discernment: Michael Savage and Mandated Birth Control," October 9, 2010)

On April 17, in his "Coronavirus Update" One Peter Five podcast he linked to the leftist New York Times (at the Chicago Tribune website) and an article by the pro-abortion newspaper that lionized the so-called conservative radio host.

In the Skojec link, the leftist newspaper admiringly wrote that the fake conservative Savage whom it claimed was a "conservative media star" despicably called the real conservative pro-life Rush Limbaugh as well as others pro-life conservatives "intellectual dwarfs" and even "mock[ed]" him as "Rush Limbaugh,M.D., Ph.D."
(ChicagoTribune.com, The New York Times, "Why Michael Savage is blasting Sean Hannity and the ring-wing media on the coronavirus," by Jeremy Peters, April 16, 2020)

The article reported that his wife Janet Weiner (Savage's real last name is Weiner) in an interview shamefully also attacked Limbaugh and other conservatives saying they have the "culty hero worship of the uneducated" and "I don't want to identify with the conservative movement anymore."

It appears that the pro-abortion eugenicist  Savage and his wife like Hillary Clinton are calling the millions of listeners of Rush and other pro-life conservatives the "deplorables."

The New York Times piece portrayed the pro-abortion Savage as being another Albert Einstein because he has a Ph.D. in "nutritional ethnomedicine" from leftist Berkeley University.

The new Einstein Savage was apparently the first "media star" to start the harebrained conspiracy theory that "65 million" were going to die due to the coronavirus.

On January 24, he started the panic hysteria by claiming that "65 million [will be] wiped out" by the new virus in a Savage Nation podcast.
(The Savage Nation Podcast, "Deadly coronavirus outbreak quickly spreading," January 24, 2020, 10:45)

On January 24, in The Alex Jones Show, space alien believer Mike Adams told Jones that Bill Gates' model show "65 million deaths will occur globally from a very similar strain of the coronavirus."
(The Alex Jones Show, "Learn the Secrets of the Coronavirus Outbreak Who's Behind it," January 24, 2020 1:20:57-1:21:02)

It appears the three Einsteins: Savage, Adams and Jones were all reading from the same conspiracy theory script.

On February 9, Skojec was one of the first Catholic "media stars" to promote the panic hysteria by posting a link in Twitter to a coronavirus scare video of Alex Jones' InfoWars protege Paul Joseph Watson.

Is it possible that the panic promotion could have been a coordinated and synchronized media effort begun by the apparent controlled opposition "conservatives": Savage, Adams, Jones and Skojec?

Is it a coincidence that Savage and Adams on Jones' show stated on the exact same day that "65 million" could die from the coronavirus?

Is it also a coincidence that Skojec only two weeks after Savage, Adams and Jones began the promotion of the virus hysteria started promoting Jones' InfoWars protege's virus scare video?

Moreover, is it a coincidence that just a few weeks ago that Skojec was still promoting the pro-abortion eugenicist Savage who together with Adams and Jones let loose the first virus panic trial balloons which soon became the hysteria that led to the unconstitutional totalitarian lockdowns and banning of the Mass?

In the last few days, the four appear to be backtracking a little while still not disclaiming their harebrained conspiracy theory that "65 million" people will die from the supposed new Black Plague Coronavirus.

Skojec has never personally promoted that "65 million" will die from the virus, but he obviously is in league with the three in propagandizing that the coronavirus is supposedly a new Black Plague.

All the above could be coincidental or is it conceivable that Savage who suddenly is being lionized by the leftist New York Times, a few days ago, as a Einstein with the other three are part of a possible controlled opposition.

Remember that Vladimir Lenin said:

"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves."
(Urban Dictionary, "Controlled Opposition")

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Mass and the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Also, pray an Our Father now for God to give President Trump the grace to do His will in this present crisis


Comments

Alexis Bugnolo said…
It does make you wonder why Skojec is out in front of the pack on fake news and doing everything he can to stop people from returning to pope benedict.

Could it have anything to do with the fake that the fake news serves the agenda of those who Benedict in his new biography said wanted to exclude him from society?
Gary said…
In a YT interview on February 2, 2020, Dr. Francis Boyle described a coronavirus vaccine that was developed by Peerbright Institute in Britain. Dr. Boyle had a copy of the US patent for the vaccine, but he hadn't read it yet. He did say, however, that it wouldn't have a US patent unless "the science was there". Here's a link to the interview:
https://greatgameindia.com/dr-francis-boyle-creator-of-bioweapons-act-says-coronavirus-is-biological-warfare-weapon/
Slide over to minute 16 to hear Dr. Boyle talk about the vaccine. Why wasn't this vaccine used along with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin and Vitamin C and Zinc back in early February to save so many of the 60+ thousand lives that have been lost so far? If you can justify shutting down the economies of all 50 states to fight a virus, why can't you justify a vaccine's use, without over a years worth of "trials", to save lives now?
Fred Martinez said…
Sorry, but it appears part of the reason for the coronavirus hysteria besides the unconstitutional totalitarian lockdowns was apparently to promote mandatory universal unconstitutional vaccines.

Popular posts from this blog

Bishops of Colorado gave an apparent Vaxx "Exemption" Letter & Stated: "Vaccination is Not Morally Obligatory and so Must Be Voluntary"

Today, the bishops of Colorado gave an apparent Vaxx " exemption" letter (21_8_Vaccine_Exemption_CCC_Fin...docx(20KB)) and stated that "Vaccination is Not Morally Obligatory and so Must Be Voluntary":  COLORADO CATHOLIC CONFERENCE 1535 Logan Street | Denver, CO 80203-1913 303-894-8808 | cocatholicconference.org   [Date]   To Whom It May Concern, [Name] is a baptized Catholic seeking a religious exemption from an immunization requirement. This letter explains how the Catholic Church’s teachings may lead individual Catholics, including [name], to decline certain vaccines. The Catholic Church teaches that a person may be required to refuse a medical intervention, including a vaccination, if his or her conscience comes to this judgment. While the Catholic Church does not prohibit the use of most vaccines, and generally encourages them to safeguard personal and public health, the following authoritative Church teachings demonstrate the principled religious

Does Francis's "Right-hand Man" Parra have a "Sexual Predation against Seminarians, Adultery, and even a Deadly Sex Game...[that] 'might even be a Scandal Surpassing that of McCarrick'"?

  Archbishop Edgar Peña Parra with Francis Today, the Call Me Jorge website asked "What could be so important that Francis interrupted his weekly adulation [Audience] session?": Pope gets a phone call during the Audience. Haven’t seen this before. Then he quickly leaves and says he will be back. pic.twitter.com/npCuPzdnxP — The Catholic Traveler (@MountainButorac) August 11, 2021 It was Abp. Mons. Edgar Robinson Peña Parra, Substitute for the Secretariat of State, who was involved in the recent scandal of mismanagement during the acquisition of a € 300 million building in London. Still no word on what the phone call was about . [http://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2021/08/what-could-be-so-important-that-francis.html] Who is Archbishop Edgar Robinson Peña Parra ? Parra according to the Catholic Herald is Francis's "right-hand man"[https://catholicherald.co.uk/roman-curia-the-popes-new-right-hand-man/] In 2019, Life Site News reported that Parra alleged

Might it be Good for all of us & for Francis to Read about the "Gruesome Death of Arius"?

  I have read the letters of your piety , in which you have requested me to make known to you the events of my times relating to myself, and to give an account of that most impious heresy of the Arians , in consequence of which I have endured these sufferings, and also of the manner of the death of Arius . With two out of your three demands I have readily undertaken to comply, and have sent to your Godliness what I wrote to the Monks; from which you will be able to learn my own history as well as that of the heresy . But with respect to the other matter, I mean the death, I debated with myself for a long time, fearing lest any one should suppose that I was exulting in the death of that man. But yet, since a disputation which has taken place among you concerning the heresy , has issued in this question, whether Arius died after previously communicating with the Church ; I therefore was necessarily desirous of giving an account of his death, as thinking that the question woul