Skip to main content

The Catholic Resistance vs. Francis in 2019

The Catholic Resistance scored major victories against Francis and his Vatican in 2019 before the New Year Slapgate scandal.

Francis and his Vatican are losing not just because he covered-up for sex-abuse predators as well as teaches that the sacrilege of Communion for adulterers is morally acceptable and in the recent Amazon Synod promoted idolatry and heresy.

Most of all they are losing because we are fighting them for God and He will not forsake us.

April 30, 2019 was a major victory, 19 top Catholic scholars led by the world renowned theologian Fr. Aidan Nichols declared that "A heretical papacy may not be tolerated":

"[T]he world's bishops [must]... admonish the Pope and [he] must publicly reject heresy or face losing the papacy."
(EdwardPentin.co.uk, " Father Aidan Nichols Signs Open Letter Charging Pope Francis with Heresy," May 1, 2019),

The last remnant of the enablers of Francis and his Vatican who claim to believe in the orthodox infallible teachings of the Catholic faith led by Jimmy Akin who came to the defense of the indefensible were humiliated and are in hiding.

The Theodore McCarrick liberal "Catholics" represented by the National Catholic Reporter, Crux, Where Peter Is and their imitators who defend Francis are Modernist heretics who promote the sacrilege of Communion for adulterers and homosexuality or both.

No real Catholics listens to their nonsense except for the McCarrick sex abuse cover-up bishops who apparently are about to face justice in numerous States for their criminal sex abuse cover-ups.

Next, came Francis's Vatican Amazon Synod in which Dubia Cardinal Walter Brandmuller declared was "heretical" and "apostasy."

So far Akin nor any of most of his follow conservative defenders of the indefensible have come out of their hiding places to claim that the doctrines of Amazonian witch doctors are really not heretical and can teach us to be better Catholics by "acculturation" if we stand on our heads, close our eyes and listen to the pantheistic cry of the earth.

Francis is losing his last totally non-heretical defenders. Even the defenders of the indefensible such as Akin don't want to be associated with a ship that appears about to sink. In other words, the rats are abandoning a sinking ship.

Yes, we have scored some major victories. But, don't think for one minute that Francis and his inner circle will not fight to the bitter end. We still have a long way to go before this war is won and Francis's ship is sunk.

Always remember what the almost penniless St. Theresa of Avila said when all the forces of hell fought against her founding convents for the glory and praise of God:

Theresa and a penny is nothing. Theresa, a penny and God is everything.

The Catholic Resistance is nothing. The Catholic Resistance and God is everything.

Keep fighting. We are winning. Victory is getting closer.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Comments

Kathleen1031 said…
Excellent and inspirational. :) Viva Cristo Rey! We are all Cristeros now.
Unknown said…
Amen.

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...