Skip to main content

Why would Christopher Ferrara, of all People, want to do Damage Control for the Author of Amoris laetitia? Bergoglian Derangement Syndrome?

Catholic Monitor commenter Justina thought Chris Ferrara joined the Francis and Pachamama apologist blog Where Peter Is in calling Francis's slapping of a woman's hand a "trivial matter":

"Chris Ferrara at Fatima.org joins in the trivialization effort, stating that "too much" has been made of this incident. Tellingly, Ferrara omits all mention of the obscenities that possibly punctuated the slapping, reporting only that Bergoglio said, "Hands! Hands!". Whatever else the Purveyor of False Mercy said, it was something--something Counselor Ferrara's take ostentatiously omits. Evidently, in his retreat from the reality of doubtful Bergoglian validity, Father Gruner's friend is willing not only to ignore Father Gruner's own opinion, but empirical evidence itself. Does having a foul mouth and a quick temper prove that a person isn't the Pope? No; of course not. But why are those committed to the concept of Bergoglian validity so afraid of mere facts? Why would Christopher Ferrara, of all people, want to do damage control for the author of Amoris laetitia? Bergoglian Derangement Syndrome again."
[http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/01/where-peter-is-armstrong-defend.html?m=1]

She was commenting on this post:

Where Peter Is (& Armstrong) defend Francis's Slapping of Woman calling it a "Trivial Matter"
The Francis and Pachamama apologist blog Where Peter Is defended Francis's slapping of a woman's hand and called it a "trivial matter":

"Regardless of whether the Pope slapped this woman's hand... "

"Even if the Pope really insulted the women with a curse word... "

"... all of this does not prove that the Pope is not fit for his post, nor will he resign over such a trivial matter."
(Where Peter Is, "On yanking and slapping hands," January 1, 2020)

In the comment section of this post Francis and Pachamama apologist Dave Armstrong showed that he agreed with the article's defence of Francis's slapping and the calling of it a "trivial matter" by saying:

"Good job."

Never forget that the Francis and Pachamama apologist blog called Where Peter Is, which I call Where Pachamama Is, defended Francis's slapping of a woman and called it a "trivial matter."

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Comments

Debbie said…
What are the odds that ALL the "shut-up, Francis is Pope you stupid, ugly, schismatics" big shots in Trad Inc. just so happened to ignore this? Sometin ain't right.

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...