Skip to main content

Where Peter Is (& Armstrong) defend Francis's Slapping of Woman calling it a "Trivial Matter"

The Francis and Pachamama apologist blog Where Peter Is defended Francis's slapping of a woman's hand and called it a "trivial matter":

"Regardless of whether the Pope slapped this woman's hand... "

"Even if the Pope really insulted the women with a curse word... "

"... all of this does not prove that the Pope is not fit for his post, nor will he resign over such a trivial matter."
(Where Peter Is, "On yanking and slapping hands," January 1, 2020)

In the comment section of this post Francis and Pachamama apologist Dave Armstrong showed that he agreed with the article's defense of Francis's slapping and the calling of it a "trivial matter" by saying:

"Good job."

Never forget that the Francis and Pachamama apologist blog called Where Peter Is, which I call Where Pachamama Is, defended Francis's slapping of a woman and called it a "trivial matter."

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Comments

Debbie said…
I don't see anything at Remnant, 1P5 or Dr. Marshall on this. I'm certain there are good rea$on$ to remain $ilent.
7:28 AM
JMCM said…
Where Peter blocked me when all I wanted was dialogue.
12:03 PM
Justina said…
Chris Ferrara at Fatima.org joins in the trivialization effort, stating that "too much" has been made of this incident. Tellingly, Ferrara omits all mention of the obscenities that possibly punctuated the slapping, reporting only that Bergoglio said, "Hands! Hands!". Whatever else the Purveyor of False Mercy said, it was something--something Counselor Ferrara's take ostentatiously omits. Evidently, in his retreat from the reality of doubtful Bergoglian validity, Father Gruner's friend is willing not only to ignore Father Gruner's own opinion, but empirical evidence itself. Does having a foul mouth and a quick temper prove that a person isn't the Pope? No; of course not. But why are those committed to the concept of Bergoglian validity so afraid of mere facts? Why would Christopher Ferrara, of all people, want to do damage control for the author of Amoris laetitia? Bergoglian Derangement Syndrome again.
12:34 PM
BrotherBeowulf said…
Chris is flying interference for his bud Michael —Trad. Inc./ Chieftain of the Clans—Matt.

Sad. Ought to take his head out of his petoot. And I like Chris, we’re practically parishioners.

Real politick old time religion Catholics like him Matt & others find it hard from their lofty pedi-degreed heights to heed the hoi polloi—read: Barnhardt—that the simple dumb sheep might have gotten it right.

2:52 PM
BrotherBeowulf said…
And note well—Matt (Remnant); Voris the Cutting Edge (churchy-militant); and of course that Establishememt sycophant with a capital E SkojEc—Trad Inc don’t even REPORT on the biggest Francis scandal since Uncle Ted:

“The Slap Heard Round The World!”
2:55 PM
BrotherBeowulf said…
Where Peter is a joke. Where’s Fagola, more like it. Complete Plant for the clerical
Homosexual Network Strangling the Church.

The Homosexual Network Strangling the Church—

Bergoglio’s Party, Faith, Religiom and Creed.
2:59 PM
BrotherBeowulf said…
Religion.
2:59 PM
BrotherBeowulf said…
Our Lady of Fatima—

Triumph.
3:00 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

5 Dubia Questions for 1P5's Steve Skojec & All faithful Catholics especially Francis is definitely Pope Cardinals, Bishops & pundits

Here are five really short and easy to answer dubia questions which hopefully aren't too complicated for Steve Skojec, publisher of the One Peter Five website, to answer. To make it really easy for the publisher of One Peter Five it has been formatted so that he only has to answer: yes or no. 1. Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales said "The Pope... when he is explicitly a heretic... the Church must either deprive him or as some say declare him deprived of his Apostolic See." Was St. Francis de Sales a Sedevacantist or a Benevacantist? Answer: yes or no. 2. "Universal Acceptance" theologian John of St. Thomas said "This man in particular lawfully elected and accepted by the Church is the supreme pontiff." Was John of St. Thomas for saying "the supreme pontiff" must be BOTH "lawfully elected and accepted by the Church" a Sedevacantist or a Benevacantist? Answer: yes or no. 3. Do you think that a "supreme pontiff...
96 comments
Read more

"Well, 'either one gives up the scapular or they give up immodesty'. The point is they cannot coexist."

By Mary's Secretary In my book  The Practice of the Presence of Mary: To Live and Die with Mary , I dedicated Part II to Our Lady of Mount Carmel and Her scapular (fitting as Her feast is approaching), and I specifically mentioned how the scapular and spaghetti straps DO NOT go together. What I mean by that is I have noticed that those in the Church who DO NOT follow the Catholic dress code typically aren’t the ones wearing the scapular. I went on to say that modesty and the scapular go together and if you ever  were  immodest in dress, the scapular, being Our Lady’s sacramental that it is, gives one the grace to BECOME modest.  I can attest to this in my own life. Only after I was enrolled in the scapular did I begin, little by little, become modest. It’s a process. Kind of like the rosary quote, “one either gives up the sin or they give up the rosary.” Well, “either one gives up the scapular or they give up immodesty”. The point is they cannot coexist. In fact...
5 comments
Read more

Fr. Chad Ripperger's Breastplate of St. Patrick (Modified) & Binding Prayer ("In the Name of Jesus Christ, our Lord and God, and by the power of the Most Holy Catholic Church of Jesus, I render all spirits impotent...")

    Deliverance Prayers II  The Minor Exorcisms and Deliverance Prayers compiled by Fr Chad Ripperger: Breastplate of St. Patrick (Modified) I bind (myself, or N.) today to a strong virtue, an invocation of the Trinity. I believe in a Threeness, with a confession of an Oneness in the Creator of the Universe. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of Christ’s birth with his baptism, to the virtue of his crucifixion with his burial, to the virtue of his resurrection with his ascension, to the virtue of his coming to the Judgment of Doom. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of ranks of Cherubim, in obedience of Angels, in service of Archangels, in hope of resurrection for reward, in prayers of Patriarchs, in preaching of Apostles, in faiths of confessors, in innocence of Holy Virgins, in deeds of righteous men. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of Heaven, in light of Sun, in brightness of Snow, in splendor of Fire, in speed of l...
3 comments
Read more