Skip to main content

Where Peter Is (& Armstrong) defend Francis's Slapping of Woman calling it a "Trivial Matter"

The Francis and Pachamama apologist blog Where Peter Is defended Francis's slapping of a woman's hand and called it a "trivial matter":

"Regardless of whether the Pope slapped this woman's hand... "

"Even if the Pope really insulted the women with a curse word... "

"... all of this does not prove that the Pope is not fit for his post, nor will he resign over such a trivial matter."
(Where Peter Is, "On yanking and slapping hands," January 1, 2020)

In the comment section of this post Francis and Pachamama apologist Dave Armstrong showed that he agreed with the article's defense of Francis's slapping and the calling of it a "trivial matter" by saying:

"Good job."

Never forget that the Francis and Pachamama apologist blog called Where Peter Is, which I call Where Pachamama Is, defended Francis's slapping of a woman and called it a "trivial matter."

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Comments

Debbie said…
I don't see anything at Remnant, 1P5 or Dr. Marshall on this. I'm certain there are good rea$on$ to remain $ilent.
JMCM said…
Where Peter blocked me when all I wanted was dialogue.
Justina said…
Chris Ferrara at Fatima.org joins in the trivialization effort, stating that "too much" has been made of this incident. Tellingly, Ferrara omits all mention of the obscenities that possibly punctuated the slapping, reporting only that Bergoglio said, "Hands! Hands!". Whatever else the Purveyor of False Mercy said, it was something--something Counselor Ferrara's take ostentatiously omits. Evidently, in his retreat from the reality of doubtful Bergoglian validity, Father Gruner's friend is willing not only to ignore Father Gruner's own opinion, but empirical evidence itself. Does having a foul mouth and a quick temper prove that a person isn't the Pope? No; of course not. But why are those committed to the concept of Bergoglian validity so afraid of mere facts? Why would Christopher Ferrara, of all people, want to do damage control for the author of Amoris laetitia? Bergoglian Derangement Syndrome again.
BrotherBeowulf said…
Chris is flying interference for his bud Michael —Trad. Inc./ Chieftain of the Clans—Matt.

Sad. Ought to take his head out of his petoot. And I like Chris, we’re practically parishioners.

Real politick old time religion Catholics like him Matt & others find it hard from their lofty pedi-degreed heights to heed the hoi polloi—read: Barnhardt—that the simple dumb sheep might have gotten it right.

BrotherBeowulf said…
And note well—Matt (Remnant); Voris the Cutting Edge (churchy-militant); and of course that Establishememt sycophant with a capital E SkojEc—Trad Inc don’t even REPORT on the biggest Francis scandal since Uncle Ted:

“The Slap Heard Round The World!”
BrotherBeowulf said…
Where Peter is a joke. Where’s Fagola, more like it. Complete Plant for the clerical
Homosexual Network Strangling the Church.

The Homosexual Network Strangling the Church—

Bergoglio’s Party, Faith, Religiom and Creed.
BrotherBeowulf said…
Religion.
BrotherBeowulf said…
Our Lady of Fatima—

Triumph.

Popular posts from this blog

Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Francis teaches HERESY," now, the question is will he do a Skojec & a Schneider Cop Out

    Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation: "[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic , he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him , or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See." (The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306) Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Pope Francis teaches HERESY: Pope Pius XII condemned the heresy of Francis": Pope Francis on Feb 2 2022, taught, "that in Christ no one can ever truly separate us from those we love because the bond is an existential bond, a strong bond that is in our very nature...who have denied the faith, who are apostates." Pope Pius XII taught the exact opposite when he wrote of those: "who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or b

Wernz-Vidal: "One cannot consider as Schismatics those who Refuse to Obey the Roman Pontiff because they would hold his person Suspect or, because of Widespread Rumors, Doubtfully Elected"

    Pope Francis is tottering on the precipice of Hell. None of this means he isn't the pope, and such talk among the laity is scandalous in its own right. Not a single cardinal in that 2013 conclave has come out and said the election was rigged and Bergoglio isn't the pope, that he is in fact an anti-pope . If he is, a future pope can declare that, when Jorge Bergoglio will no longer be a pope. But if the very men gathered in conclave haven't made that public accusation,  anyone who is suggesting that better take into account that they too will have to give an account of themselves to Almighty God when they die . Such talk adds to the scandal of the "little ones," the simple, even potential converts, who, when they hear big-mouth Catholics on social media saying he's not really the pope, draw back from approaching the Church. Do any of us desire to stand in front Our Blessed Lord as the Supreme Judge and explain why, in our desire for more c

The Nuremberg Trial-like Excuse which Cardinal Burke has so Staggeringly, so Stereotypically Proffered on the Promised “Formal Correction”

Does Cardinal Burke think Francis is an antipope? On at least five occasions, Cardinal Burke has rejected the magisterial nature of official papal teaching (in one case, pre-emptively dismissing a hypothetical official teaching of the Magisterium): Cardinal Burke has rejected the official teaching of Pope Francis in the new Apostolic Constitution Episcopalis Communio concerning the possibility that a pope can raise the final synodal document to the level of ordinary magisterium, if the pope chooses. (We covered the Episcopalis Communio here .) The whole apostolic constitution on the Synod is problematic. … This idea that either the Pope on his own or the Synod together with the Pope can create some new Magisterium [i.e. a new teaching of the ordinary Magisterium], is simply false. The Synod is a consultative body, to help the Pope to see how best to present the Church’s teaching in time. It’s not able to create ordinary Magisterium. As a canon lawyer, Cardinal Burk