Skip to main content

Are 1P5 and Where Peter Is going to Merge and become Where One Peter Five Is?

There are rumors that Francis traditionalist Steve Skojec's One Peter Five (1P5) and Francis liberal Mike Lewis' Where Peter Is are going to merge and become Where One Peter Five Is.

These rumors began when One Peter Five writer Eric Sammons and Lewis joined hands in their common communion in their Francis is definitely pope maligning campaign against Frank Walker's Canon 212 which is calling for an cardinal and bishop investigation into the validity or invalidity of Francis's pontificate due to irregularities in his conclave and the apparent canonical irregularities in the resignation of Pope Benedict XVI:

Mike Lewis 22h
I have no idea what it means, but it has to be in the top 5 most wild C212 headlines of all time.
Reply Retweet Like
Eric Sammons 19h
I’ve been living rent-free in Frank’s head for months now, which is why I blocked him a while back.
Reply Retweet Like
      7h
I've been there for a while myself, there's a new and exciting headline from him 3-4 times a week. Apparently I am a pawn of the UN and George Soros or something.
Moreover, it is rumored that One Peter Five's Skojec and Sammons will join hands with Where Peter Is' Lewis and recite their common Francis Creed when the new Where One Peter Five Is finally emerges:

The Francis Creed

"I believe in Francis and that it is infallible dogma that he is pope no matter what evidence shows that he violated the Pope John Paul II constitution that governed the validity or invalidity of the 2013 conclave. He suffered under Bishop Rene Gracida who classified the evidence that the constitution was violated and called the cardinals to investigate. He descended into the Vatican gay lobby. He ascended to the papal throne where he sits surrounded by the gay lobby cardinals from where he shall judge the teachings of Jesus Christ, the Ten Commandments and all the infallible Catholic teachings."

"I believe in Amoris Laetitia, the Communion of adulterers, Francis's representation of globalist teachings which embodies the Soros gospel of unlimited mass immigration, climate change, a one-world government and the goddess Mother Earth everlasting."

I wrote this ecumenical creed with the hope that it will help all the Francis traditionalists and the Francis liberals to unite in their common communion with Francis.

After all, isn't it true that recently the leftist Lewis Catholics have joined hands with their Francis traditionalist brothers in using the Skojec and Sammons talking points of "schismatic" and "sedevacantist" against all Catholics who present evidence that the 2013 conclave Pope John Paul constitution was violated including Bishop Gracida and even Cardinal Raymond Burke for daring to imply that the Francis conclave could be invalid and that Francis's Communion for adulterers could be heretical.

While it is well known that Skojec, Sammons and all the Francis traditionalists feel uncomfortable with the Soros gospel part of the Francis Creed, they must endure this temporary discomfort.

They must remember that they do agree with the Francis liberals in the part of the creed that says it is a infallible dogma that Francis is a valid pope no matter what the evidence shows and moreover they must stay in communion with him even when by his "authentic Magisterium" authority he teaches Communion for adulterers without committing obstinate heresy.

They must never forget that they are in union with the Francis liberals in believing that he cannot be corrected nor can he as Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales proclaimed be "deprived... of his Apostlic See" for being "explicitly a heretic":

"The Pope... when he is explicitly a heretic... the Church must either deprive him or as some say declare him deprived of his Apostlic See."
(The Catholic Controversy by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of the Mary.

Comments

Aqua said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Alexis Bugnolo said…
Fred, if you had a late night show, it would be the rave of the Catholic world.....
Fred Martinez said…
Thanks Br. Bugnolo. Maybe you and I could team up. It might be fun.
Oh, it is good to laugh! Thank you for this post. Humor is a wonderful thing!
This would hardly be surprising. Skojec's donations and internet traffic has been falling off steadily since he waged war against any Catholic who refused to accept the Bergoglio anti-papacy.

More to the point, Skojec even went on a rant a few months back about how he's sick of his "Catholic guilt" making him feel bad about his comfortable six figure income from his very profitable "non-profit" charlatan enterprise. And how "$100,000 used to be a lot of money - until it wasn't" (he was actually raking in over $175,000) and how his expensive Jeep and other finer things brought him material happiness and - bye-god he deserved it! And you dumb Catholics should thank him for his tireless work!

- which apparently involves him roosting on twitter and FB 16 hours a day posting his personal opinions about everything and nothing at all and endlessly flinging snot-nosed juvenile insults at anyone who dares disagrees with his "Francis is totally the pope!" insanity.
Fr. VF said…
What is more satisfying than the sight of a blogger's funding drying up as a result of his refusal to follow the evidence where it leads because of his fear of losing popularity?
JMCM said…
Mike Lewis blocked me.........I am honored!
Unknown said…
I totally agree. Www.laitycorp.com

Popular posts from this blog

Bishops of Colorado gave an apparent Vaxx "Exemption" Letter & Stated: "Vaccination is Not Morally Obligatory and so Must Be Voluntary"

Today, the bishops of Colorado gave an apparent Vaxx " exemption" letter (21_8_Vaccine_Exemption_CCC_Fin...docx(20KB)) and stated that "Vaccination is Not Morally Obligatory and so Must Be Voluntary":  COLORADO CATHOLIC CONFERENCE 1535 Logan Street | Denver, CO 80203-1913 303-894-8808 | cocatholicconference.org   [Date]   To Whom It May Concern, [Name] is a baptized Catholic seeking a religious exemption from an immunization requirement. This letter explains how the Catholic Church’s teachings may lead individual Catholics, including [name], to decline certain vaccines. The Catholic Church teaches that a person may be required to refuse a medical intervention, including a vaccination, if his or her conscience comes to this judgment. While the Catholic Church does not prohibit the use of most vaccines, and generally encourages them to safeguard personal and public health, the following authoritative Church teachings demonstrate the principled religious

Does Francis's "Right-hand Man" Parra have a "Sexual Predation against Seminarians, Adultery, and even a Deadly Sex Game...[that] 'might even be a Scandal Surpassing that of McCarrick'"?

  Archbishop Edgar Peña Parra with Francis Today, the Call Me Jorge website asked "What could be so important that Francis interrupted his weekly adulation [Audience] session?": Pope gets a phone call during the Audience. Haven’t seen this before. Then he quickly leaves and says he will be back. pic.twitter.com/npCuPzdnxP — The Catholic Traveler (@MountainButorac) August 11, 2021 It was Abp. Mons. Edgar Robinson Peña Parra, Substitute for the Secretariat of State, who was involved in the recent scandal of mismanagement during the acquisition of a € 300 million building in London. Still no word on what the phone call was about . [http://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2021/08/what-could-be-so-important-that-francis.html] Who is Archbishop Edgar Robinson Peña Parra ? Parra according to the Catholic Herald is Francis's "right-hand man"[https://catholicherald.co.uk/roman-curia-the-popes-new-right-hand-man/] In 2019, Life Site News reported that Parra alleged

Might it be Good for all of us & for Francis to Read about the "Gruesome Death of Arius"?

  I have read the letters of your piety , in which you have requested me to make known to you the events of my times relating to myself, and to give an account of that most impious heresy of the Arians , in consequence of which I have endured these sufferings, and also of the manner of the death of Arius . With two out of your three demands I have readily undertaken to comply, and have sent to your Godliness what I wrote to the Monks; from which you will be able to learn my own history as well as that of the heresy . But with respect to the other matter, I mean the death, I debated with myself for a long time, fearing lest any one should suppose that I was exulting in the death of that man. But yet, since a disputation which has taken place among you concerning the heresy , has issued in this question, whether Arius died after previously communicating with the Church ; I therefore was necessarily desirous of giving an account of his death, as thinking that the question woul