Skip to main content

Why's Leftist Environmentalist Mike Lewis implying TFP's De Oliveira is a Fascist?

Might leftist environmentalist Where Peter Is's Mike Lewis be implying that Plinio Correa de Oliveira is a Fascist because he doesn't know what he's talking about?

The anti-Hitler and anti-Communist de Oliveira who founded Tradition, Family and Property (TFP) in 1942 wrote:

"Hitler prefers the advance of Russia to the Anglo-American coalition. Defeated, he tries to influence the configuration of tommorow's world. This is his ultimate crime."
(O Legionario, 23 August 1942)

Leftist always want to pretend that Hitler wasn't a Socialist like them and preferred the Socialist Communist Russians to the non-Socialist Anglo-American coalition.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate of Mary.

Comments

Aqua said…
If you look at the real fascists of the 20th century - their demagogic propensity to stir up the violent emotions of the crowd, and as a pack of enraged wolves target that deadly emotion toward the object of their hatred, separate out the weak and the innocent - it is the leftists that are in violent alignment with that behavior.

And the lies ... always blaming the “other” for their own moral vacuum.

They don’t fool anyone anymore, except themselves. Mike Lewis is preaching to his own choir. Once you accept an antipope and his Pachamama Baal as a god, you are in a dark, dark place if you profess to be Catholic. Expect a spiritual fruit not so sweet or nutritious.

Popular posts from this blog

Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Francis teaches HERESY," now, the question is will he do a Skojec & a Schneider Cop Out

    Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation: "[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic , he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him , or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See." (The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306) Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Pope Francis teaches HERESY: Pope Pius XII condemned the heresy of Francis": Pope Francis on Feb 2 2022, taught, "that in Christ no one can ever truly separate us from those we love because the bond is an existential bond, a strong bond that is in our very nature...who have denied the faith, who are apostates." Pope Pius XII taught the exact opposite when he wrote of those: "who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or b

Wernz-Vidal: "One cannot consider as Schismatics those who Refuse to Obey the Roman Pontiff because they would hold his person Suspect or, because of Widespread Rumors, Doubtfully Elected"

    Pope Francis is tottering on the precipice of Hell. None of this means he isn't the pope, and such talk among the laity is scandalous in its own right. Not a single cardinal in that 2013 conclave has come out and said the election was rigged and Bergoglio isn't the pope, that he is in fact an anti-pope . If he is, a future pope can declare that, when Jorge Bergoglio will no longer be a pope. But if the very men gathered in conclave haven't made that public accusation,  anyone who is suggesting that better take into account that they too will have to give an account of themselves to Almighty God when they die . Such talk adds to the scandal of the "little ones," the simple, even potential converts, who, when they hear big-mouth Catholics on social media saying he's not really the pope, draw back from approaching the Church. Do any of us desire to stand in front Our Blessed Lord as the Supreme Judge and explain why, in our desire for more c

The Nuremberg Trial-like Excuse which Cardinal Burke has so Staggeringly, so Stereotypically Proffered on the Promised “Formal Correction”

Does Cardinal Burke think Francis is an antipope? On at least five occasions, Cardinal Burke has rejected the magisterial nature of official papal teaching (in one case, pre-emptively dismissing a hypothetical official teaching of the Magisterium): Cardinal Burke has rejected the official teaching of Pope Francis in the new Apostolic Constitution Episcopalis Communio concerning the possibility that a pope can raise the final synodal document to the level of ordinary magisterium, if the pope chooses. (We covered the Episcopalis Communio here .) The whole apostolic constitution on the Synod is problematic. … This idea that either the Pope on his own or the Synod together with the Pope can create some new Magisterium [i.e. a new teaching of the ordinary Magisterium], is simply false. The Synod is a consultative body, to help the Pope to see how best to present the Church’s teaching in time. It’s not able to create ordinary Magisterium. As a canon lawyer, Cardinal Burk