Skip to main content

2014 1P5 Skojec: The "Office" of a True Pope means "Never has he [Francis] Officially endorsed Cardinal Kasper’s Erroneous Views on Adulterous Marriages – Nor could he!"

In 2014, One Peter Five publisher Steve Skojec said the "office" of a true pope means "never has he [Francis] officially endorsed Cardinal Kasper’s erroneous views on adulterous marriages – nor could he!":

"And yet despite the pope’s compliments on Kasper’s thought, never has he officially endorsed Cardinal Kasper’s erroneous views on adulterous marriages – nor could he! The infallibility of his office prevents him from doing so. [1P5's bolding]":
[https://onepeterfive.com/the-troubling-case-of-cardinal-kasper/]

A One Peter Five commenter Asbury Fox tried to give Skojec an out from saying a true pope "could" "never... officially endorsed Cardinal Kasper’s erroneous views on adulterous marriages":

Asbury Fox

"I would disagree with the statement that the Pope could never accept Kasper's views. I think that the evidence has shown that Francis is in perfect agreement with Kasper, only that the Pope lets Kasper speak for him publicly. The office of the papacy does not have Impeccability. The Pope can embrace Kasper's heretical views of his own free will and teach them. Popes can fall into heresy. Popes can then expose their heretical views for the Church to see and be scandalized."

"Papal Infallibilty [sic] is very limited and applies only to ex cathedra statements. The Holy Ghost will prevent a Pope from teaching a heresy ex cathedra, but the Holy Ghost will not prevent the Pope from actually holding a heresy and spreading his error. The Pope is a man with free will who can reject the guidance of the Holy Spirit."
[https://onepeterfive.com/the-troubling-case-of-cardinal-kasper/]

But, Skojec doubled down saying the "office" of a true pope means "He has never, and can never, officially endorse heretical views":

Avatar



 "I believe the operative word in that statement was 'officially.' He has never, and can never, officially endorse heretical views. That's what the office prevents. It keeps him from ex officio or ex cathedra errors in faith and morals."
[https://onepeterfive.com/the-troubling-case-of-cardinal-kasper/]

So what is Skojec waiting for now: an "official acts of the Apostolic See" such as this:

Not privately, but Pope Francis officially acting as the pope explicitly contradicted traditional Catholic teaching on divorce and remarriage when he in a "official act as the pope" placed the Argentine letter in the Acts of the Apostolic See (AAS) in which he said of the Buenos Aires region episcopal guidelines:

"There is no other interpretations."

The guidelines explicitly allows according to LifeSiteNews "sexuality active adulterous couples facing 'complex circumstances' to 'access the sacraments of Reconciliation and the Eucharist.'"
(LifeSiteNews, "Confusion explodes as Pope Francis throws magisterial weight behind communion for adulterers, December 4, 2017)

In a article on OnePeterFive, specialist in Magisterial authority Dr. John Joy said "It means that it is an official act of the pope." 

Moreover, the article said:

"Dr. Joy pointed out that adding the letter to the AAS could, in fact, damage the credibility of Amoris Laetitia by potentially removing the possibility that it could be intercepted in an orthodox way, via its publication in the official acts of the Apostolic See, that the unorthodox interpretation is the official one."
(OnePeterFive, "Pope's Letter on Argentinian Communion Guidelines for Remarriage Given Official Status," December 2, 2017)
The "official act of" Francis is a "unorthodox interpretation."

It is not just a private contradiction of traditional Catholic teaching.
The "official act of the pope" is a "unorthodox interpretation" which means it contradicts traditional Catholic teaching which is just another way of saying by "official act the pope" is teaching heresy.

Now, let us quote philosopher Ed Feser:

"(1) Adulterous sexual acts are in some special circumstances morally permissible... these propositions flatly contradict irreformable Catholic teaching. Proposition (1) contradicts not only the perennial moral teaching of the Church, but the teaching of scripture itself."
(Edwardfeser.blogspot, "Denial flows into the Tiber," December 18, 2016)

How's that for an understatement?

But, just in case Skojec thinks an "official acts of the Apostolic See" isn't enough maybe he has heard that God commanded in one of the Ten Commandments:

"Thou shalt not commit adultery."

But, just in case he never heard of the Ten Commandments, Dubia Cardinal Walter Brandmuller said:

"Whoever thinks that persistent adultery and reception of Holy Communion are compatible is a heretic and promotes schism."
(LifeSiteNews, "Dubia Cardinal: Anyone who Opens Communion to Adulterers a Heretic and Promotes Schism," December 23, 2016)

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.



      Comments

      Alexis Bugnolo said…
      I HONESTLY hope Skojec reads this post, so his conscience can be confronted with the fact that for a personal decision to remain in communion with friends who are modernists, he has changed the very definitions of truth as the years go by, doing exactly what he has condemned concerning liberals and marxists and modernists.

      He is not intellectually or morally consistent. And if he wont recognize that, then I hope everyone else does. Because his position is gravely immoral and extremely scandalous as it is leading many souls to damnation.

      Steve, if you read my comment, know that I am praying for you daily, to snap out of your political faith and return to the dogmatic faith of the Church. You have to chose between your friends and Christ, because the friends you have chosen are bad company and are not acting upon the faith when they say, that Bergoglio is the pope.

      Popular posts from this blog

      "Exorcist Fr. Ripperger is asking everyone to say this Prayer until the Election is Resolved"

      A good friend of the Catholic Monitor got this from a group message. She said "exorcist Fr. Chad Ripperger is asking everyone to say this prayer until the election is resolved": Prayer of Command In His Name and by the power of His Cross and Blood, I ask Jesus to bind any evil spirits, forces and powers of the earth, air, fire, or water, of the netherworld and the satanic forces of nature.  By the power of the Holy Spirit and by His authority, I ask Jesus Christ to break any curses, hexes, or spells and send them back to where they came from, if it be His Holy Will.  I beseech Thee Lord Jesus to protect us by pouring Thy Precious Blood on us (my family, etc.), which Thou hast shed for us and I ask Thee to command that any departing spirits leave quietly, without disturbance, and go straight to Thy Cross to dispose of as Thou sees fit.  I ask Thee to bind any demonic interaction, interplay, or communications.  I place N. (Person, place or thing) under the protectio

      High-profile Lawyer Barnes: Amy Coney Barrett would be a Disaster

      High-profile trial lawyer Robert Barnes who deals in civil, criminal and constitutional law reported on Twitter that Amy Coney Barrett would be a disaster. The Barnes Twitter report shows that Coney Barrett has " sid[ed] with the government on the lockdowns, on uncompensated takings, on excusing First Amendment infringements & Fourth Amendment violations... [and] exclaimed the benefits of Jacobson, the decision that green-lit forced vaccines & carved out an emergency exception to Constitutional protection in "public health" or "emergency" cases used to justify forced sterilizations & detention camps... [and] hid behind precedent... to prohibit pro-life activists from exercising their free speech ." The Avvo.com lawyer directory reports that attorney "Robert Barnes embraces the challenge to defend the little guy and stand up for what is right. This is why he left the prestigious Yale Law School, whom publicly stated their unwill

      If Kamala Harris' Father is part White & part Jamaican African and her Mother is Asian-Indian then is she really Black?

        Is Joe Biden's running mate really Black? If Kamala Harris' father is part white and part Jamaican African and her mother is Asian-Indian then is she really Black? Reason.com tries to figure it out: Kamala Harris, Joe Biden's pick to be the Democratic Party's vice-presidential nominee, is the daughter of an Indian immigrant mother and a Jamaican immigrant father. Her father, as I understand it, has ancestors of both European and African origin. [Welcome new Volokh readers. FYI, I've been working on a book on the American Law of Race, with this forthcoming article the first relevant output. My own opinion is that Ms. Harris should be deemed American, period, but there is no such box on government forms, and if you decline to state your race, someone will decide for you… First things first. There is no multiracial or mixed-race category in American law in any jurisdiction. Nor is there an Indian category. So Harris cannot be legally Indian, nor can she b