Skip to main content

Is Scott Greer right that Far-left Critical Race Theory is just like the Right's new "Critical Pedo Theory" with the Democrat Socialists going along to get totalitarian power?


Tucker Carlson needs to listen to Scott Greer on “'Critical Pedo Theory' to the marketplace of ideas... defined... as the Right’s answer to Critical Race Theory":


Do liberals actually believe in CPT? Probably not. But they know it’s smart politics to smear their opponents as pedophile protectors. It makes their Republican foes even worse than racists in the public eye...


... It’s unclear how much Epstein will affect the midterms, but Democrats see it as a potent issue for themselves. It at least serves as a way to embarrass the Trump administration and cause division within MAGA. The Epstein case is the primary stated reason for influencers and Republican politicians to turn on the president. This matter could dampen turnout among Republicans in the fall and may even convince some to vote Democrat. It wouldn’t be that surprising to see jilted Marjorie Taylor Greene endorse Ossoff in Georgia.

The Epstein saga has been one of the Right’s biggest own goals. The demand for the Epstein files came pretty much entirely from conservatives. Elon Musk brought the issue to the forefront of political debate last summer when he accused Trump of being in the files and demanded their release. Before that, they were largely a secondary issue that only drew the attention of right-leaning influencers. But the world’s richest man made it news once again, and when the admin announced Epstein killed himself and there was no “list,” outrage erupted. It then moved from an issue primarily discussed on Rumble to one covered by CNN and network news.

Conservatives wanted the Epstein files released in order to prove the liberal elite were all pedos. This would fully vindicate their brand of populism. But the files painted a very different and far more complicated picture. While the files don’t implicate Trump in any real wrongdoing, public perception now falsely sees him as a close Epstein ally and even as a pedo. The only side that has been harmed by the Epstein case is the Right. The Left wasn’t tarnished by any of the accusations. Leftists were happy to throw Noam Chomsky and other implicated left-wing luminaries under the bus. It’s only served to help their cause.

One of the people most embarrassed by the Epstein files is Elon himself. The man who drew public attention to the matter apparently forgot about his lengthy correspondence with Epstein and his previous requests to visit the sex offender’s island. The lack of awareness was standard for most of the Right.

Right-wingers still might genuinely care the most about Epstein. CPT is more part of their worldview than it would be for liberals. Liberals only see it as an idea to exploit for their own political gain while it’s critical for how a number of rightists see the world. The Epstein saga has the potential to drive them away from right-wing causes. One disturbed young man tried to assassinate Trump over the weekend due to the Epstein files. According to his friends, he was a former Trump supporter who lost his mind over the story. There could be more like him.

CPT is no longer a useful idea for the Right. It doesn’t neuter the Left’s racism accusations or undermine liberal moralizing. It’s now more likely to sow division and demoralization on the Right than to galvanize opposition to the Left. The Epstein files certainly had information that was pertinent to public interest, but the haphazard way they were released was bound to generate this response. Conservative leaders should’ve thought this matter through before eagerly promising their audience proof of their wildest conspiracy theories.

The Left’s cynical adoption of CPT demonstrates how conspiratorial populism can bite the Right in the ass. If everyone in government is in on the pedophile cabal, that’s eventually going to include your own side when they gain power. It’s too anti-establishment and eager for drama to help a party make serious changes to the country.

Some accelerationists on the Right may still cheer on the popularity of CPT because it encourages dissent against the “system.” But if the end result is CPT believers voting Democrat and embracing their fellow pedo haters regardless of skin color, then it’s useless. It reaffirms support for the status quo. People revolting against the system on behalf of poorly-formed notions of cannibal pedophile cabals doesn’t help our side. What helps our side is encouraging identitarian thinking and enacting nationalist policies. CPT encourages an amorphous populism that is far more inclined to believe that race was invented by the elites to divide the people. It offers a completely different worldview from that of identitarians. It distracts from our mission rather than aids it.

There’s little sign that CPT or any other form of conspiratorial populism will dissipate anytime soon. The Epstein Files offer enough tidbits to validate these worldviews, and the new media environment is too dependent on this way of thinking to forsake it. It will continue to lead to self-sabotage.

The Right only has itself to blame when Democrats campaign against the Epstein class in the midterms. [https://www.highly-respected.com/p/the-broad-appeal-of-critical-pedo?utm_source=publication-search]

R.J. Shaw explains the Democrat Socialists plan: 

https://youtu.be/XSnLR5_Bnkg?is=F6ijygaTFW026HOr 
Well, according to the Democratic Socialists, they would be in prison because they're oppressed peoples.
15 minutes, 37 seconds
That's why you got to abolish the prisons. They're just being oppressed by a capitalist system. That's why they went to prison. No other reason. So, of course, give them back their full right
15 minutes, 45 seconds
to vote. Under the section, the next section, it is a real democracy. It says, "For the working class to govern,
15 minutes, 52 seconds
we need a new political system. End political corruption and legalized bribery. Get rid of lobbyists, dark
16 minutes, 2 seconds
money, and Citizens United, and publicly finance all elections." And oh, by the way, if you're thinking to yourself,
16 minutes, 10 seconds
"Well, that sounds good." How do they plan to do that? Well, that's what they say next. They plan to do that by abolishing the electoral college,
16 minutes, 18 seconds
replacing the president and supreme court with an executive and judiciary chosen by and subordinate to Congress.
16 minutes, 30 seconds
This is me reading what they're actually saying. I'm not paraphrasing here.
16 minutes, 33 seconds
Abolish the electoral college. Replace the president and the Supreme Court with an expanded Congress. And then they go on to talk about a Democratic Congress.
16 minutes, 42 seconds
That's the next section. What does this new Congress look like? It says, "Replace the two-party system with a multi-party democracy, expand the House
16 minutes, 51 seconds
of Representatives, implement proportional representation and ranked choice voting in all elections, and
16 minutes, 59 seconds
abolish the Senate." So, what does this new democracy look like? Because remember, a little ways up, they said
17 minutes, 7 seconds
they need to fundamentally change the entire system. This new system looks like getting rid of the president, getting rid of the Supreme Court,
17 minutes, 14 seconds
getting rid of the Senate, and expanding the House of Representatives. So basically, all you have left is the House of Representatives. There are no
17 minutes, 21 seconds
checks and balances at all because that's what the tripart system is about.
17 minutes, 26 seconds
You have Congress, which itself has a check and balance in itself from the House of Representatives and the Senate.
17 minutes, 34 seconds
But Congress is checked by the president and the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court is checked by Congress and the president. The president is checked by
17 minutes, 42 seconds
Congress and the Supreme Court. I don't know. Maybe I'm just way off base here.
17 minutes, 46 seconds
Maybe I don't understand. But if you get rid of everything else besides the House of Representatives, what do you got? We got no checks and balances whatsoever.
17 minutes, 54 seconds
I'm not entirely sure how they plan to replace the two-party system with a multi-partied system because the two-party system was what the people
18 minutes, 3 seconds
chose. There used to be a multi-party system. It was just people whittle down all the parties to two parties and if they want to choose other parties they
18 minutes, 10 seconds
can do so. So I'm assuming again this is me assuming here I'm assuming they're going to legislate it in some way which is to say oh that house of
18 minutes, 18 seconds
representatives well the parties that you can vote for in that house of representatives will be chosen by the government. Gee that's going to work out
18 minutes, 27 seconds
well. What do you think looking at history? Can you see that working out so well in history especially you know the last century in I don't know USSR sure
18 minutes, 36 seconds
in China now sure that works out beautifully and again this was one of the parts which they covered on the news which they said you really want to do
18 minutes, 43 seconds
this to get rid of the presidency to get rid of the Supreme Court to end the Senate the representative for the democratic socialist of America said yes.


Pray an Our Father now for reparation for the sins committed because of Francis’s Amoris Laetitia and for the restoration of the Church.

Stop for a moment of silence, ask Jesus Christ what He wants you to do now and next. In this silence remember God, Father, Son and Holy Ghost – Three Divine Persons yet One God, has an ordered universe where you can know truth and falsehood as well as never forget that He wants you to have eternal happiness with Him as his son or daughter by grace. Make this a practice. By doing this you are doing more good than reading anything here or anywhere else on the Internet.

I ask all The Catholic Monitor readers to also pray for the end of this war. Watch "Trump Calls Putin To Get Iran War Offramp! w/ Scott Ritter" on YouTube: ...Read more Please Pray for Trump to end the Iran War: Watch "Trump Calls Putin To Get Iran War Offramp! w/ Scott Ritter" on YouTubeFranklin & Graham calls on Christians to pray for 'end to the bloodshed' ahead of Trump-Putin summit...7mo




Conclave Notes:


-- Open letter urges Pope Leo XIV to correct ‘scandalous incoherence’ in Amoris Laetitia...[Wow! Even notorious Popesplainer Fr.] Harrison warns that Pope Francis taught a ‘dangerous self-contradiction’ on Communion for the divorced and ‘remarried,’ petitioning Pope Leo to correct the record. [https://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2025/08/open-letter-urges-pope-leo-xiv-to.html]

--  Dr. Seifert, regarded as one of the greatest living Catholic philosophers, founding Rector of the International Academy of Philosopher & friend of John Paul II, to Cardinals: INVESTIGATE FRANCIS' HERESIES, VALIDITY BEFORE THE CONCLAVE.."If Francis is found guilty of heresy or apostasy, then: - His cardinal appointments would be invalid" [https://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2025/04/dr-seifert-philosopher-personal-friend.html] 

-- Are the Cardinals who will participate in the upcoming conclave authentically appointed & morally justified in voting, or will the shadow of Francis's possible illegitimacy cast itself over the next papacy?  [https://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2025/04/are-cardinals-who-will-participate-in.html]

-- 5 Dubia Questions for 1P5's Steve Skojec & All faithful Catholics especially Francis is definitely Pope Cardinals, Bishops & pundits [https://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2019/06/5-dubia-questions-for-steve-skojec.html]

Francis Notes:

l– Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation:


“[T]he Pope… WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him, or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See.”
(The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)

Saint Robert Bellarmine, also, said “the Pope heretic is not deposed ipso facto, but must be declared deposed by the Church.”
[https://archive.org/stream/SilveiraImplicationsOfNewMissaeAndHereticPopes/Silveira%20Implications%20of%20New%20Missae%20and%20Heretic%20Popes_djvu.txt]

– “If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2020/12/if-francis-is-heretic-what-should.html

– “Could Francis be a Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2019/03/could-francis-be-antipope-even-though.html

– If Francis betrays Benedict XVI & the”Roman Rite Communities” like he betrayed the Chinese Catholics we must respond like St. Athanasius, the Saintly English Bishop Robert Grosseteste & “Eminent Canonists and Theologians” by “Resist[ing]” him: https://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/12/if-francis-betrays-benedict-xvi.html 

 –  LifeSiteNews, “Confusion explodes as Pope Francis throws magisterial weight behind communion for adulterers,” December 4, 2017:

The AAS guidelines explicitly allows “sexually active adulterous couples facing ‘complex circumstances’ to ‘access the sacraments of Reconciliation and the Eucharist.'”

–  On February 2018, in Rorate Caeli, Catholic theologian Dr. John Lamont:

“The AAS statement… establishes that Pope Francis in Amoris Laetitia has affirmed propositions that are heretical in the strict sense.”

– On December 2, 2017, Bishop Rene Gracida:

“Francis’ heterodoxy is now official. He has published his letter to the Argentina bishops in Acta Apostlica Series making those letters magisterial documents.”

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church by the bishops by the grace of God.

Election Notes: 

– Intel Cryptanalyst-Mathematician on Biden Steal: “212Million Registered Voters & 66.2% Voting,140.344 M Voted…Trump got 74 M, that leaves only 66.344 M for Biden” [http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/intel-cryptanalyst-mathematician-on.html?m=1]

– Will US be Venezuela?: Ex-CIA Official told Epoch Times “Chávez started to Focus on [Smartmatic] Voting Machines to Ensure Victory as early as 2003”: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/will-us-be-venezuela-ex-cia-official.html

– Tucker Carlson’s Conservatism Inc. Biden Steal Betrayal is explained by “One of the Greatest Columns ever Written” according to Rush: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/tucker-carlsons-conservatism-inc-biden.html?m=1

– A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020:
http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/01/a-hour-which-will-live-in-infamy-1001pm.html?m=1

What is needed right now to save America from those who would destroy our God given rights is to pray at home or in church and if called to even go to outdoor prayer rallies in every town and city across the United States for God to pour out His grace on our country to save us from those who would use a Reichstag Fire-like incident to destroy our civil liberties. [Is the [J6] DC Capitol Incident Comparable to the Nazi Reichstag Fire Incident where the German People Lost their Civil Liberties?http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/is-dc-capital-incident-comparable-to.html?m=1 and Epoch Times Show Crossroads on Capitol Incident: “Anitfa ‘Agent Provocateurs‘”:
http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/epoch-times-show-crossroads-on-capital.html?m=1

Pray an Our Father now for the grace to know God’s Will and to do it.

Pray an Our Father now for America.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...