Skip to main content

St. Padre Pio and the Third Secret of Fatima: ‘Satan will rule over a false church’ The importance of Our Lady of Fatima's warnings and the Third Secret cannot be stressed enough. German priest Father Frank Unterhalt reminds the faithful of that in a recent article on St. Padre Pio, his charism, and his vision of the Third Secret.

St. Padre Pio and the Third Secret of Fatima: ‘Satan will rule over a false church’

The importance of Our Lady of Fatima's warnings and the Third Secret cannot be stressed enough. German priest Father Frank Unterhalt reminds the faithful of that in a recent article on St. Padre Pio, his charism, and his vision of the Third Secret.

Comments

Renato said…
Father Frank Unterhalt recalls what the boys said at Fatima that the "Holy Father would have to suffer a lot." There is a quote about this by the Father about Pope John Paul II when analyzing after the assassination attempt he suffered, on May 13, 1981.

The Pope says that this attack was not directed only at him, but at the Mystical Body of Christ on Earth, which he represented. According to the teachings of St. Augustine, according to the Father, the Vicar of Christ is the figure "ecclesiae" and represents the Church as a whole.

In this context, the center of this apocalyptic battle must be understood, which becomes clearer every day.

Then the enemies intended to replace this aforementioned figure, who receives a divine imposition through the Petrine munus, which leaves the Church immune to a direct destruction by Satan. Therefore, logically, this replacement would only be a Pope who does not have the munus petrine, that is, an antipope at the top of the ecclesiastical hierarchy.

Benedict XVI has always suffered attacks from the mainstream media and other injustices from him when he was Cardinal head of the former Holy Office in the pontificate of John Paul II, from agents of Freemasonry and the left. It was no coincidence that Hilary Clinton confessed, together with Obama, a great desire to remove him when he was Bishop of Rome. Because he was an obstacle to this New Order that is approaching today. That is why it has reached its apex today with the Mafia of St. Gallen, which had several accomplices, including Bertone and Sodano, for totally preventing Ratzinger from exercising his ministry (as Viganò demonstrated), to put Bergoglio. This clearly demonstrates a plan to put an end to the continuity of the papacy and the Church altogether, as St. Maximilian Maria Kolbe had testified. For by ending the papacy, the Church no longer exists

[more]
Renato said…
That is why Benedict XVI did not abdicate and they themselves fell into schism so that they blindly began an invalid and null conclave, soon after the Pope declared that he was totally impeded, subtly mentioning an abdicated ministry, only for those who have eyes to see.

So Ratzinger, together with Wotyla, leaves them the continuity with the Church, through the "Universi Dominici Gregis" when it is said that "there is no need for any declaration" coming from Rome in order not to be an accomplice. It is a natural right of the faithful not to commune with this usurpation and occupation of the Roman See by the enemies of the faith because this obviously loses one's own soul.

But it is only the beginning of this battle of the Anti-Church against the Church, because it is not just breaking with it. A purification is also planned for the good of the Church itself with these enemies of the faith among the members who are still faithful to the Church.

John Paul II himself makes this clearer:

"We must prepare for great trials in the near future. Yes, they may even require the giving of our lives, and total dedication to Christ and for Christ! They can be mitigated by your and our prayers, but they cannot be avoided. Only in this way can the true renewal of the Church come. The renewal of the Church was often born of blood. It will be no different this time. Let us be strong and let us prepare ourselves and trust in Christ and His Most Holy Mother. Let's pray the Rosary a lot and often! (https://obramissionaria.com.br/padre-frank-unterhalt/)"




Popular posts from this blog

Fr. Chad Ripperger's Breastplate of St. Patrick (Modified) & Binding Prayer ("In the Name of Jesus Christ, our Lord and God, and by the power of the Most Holy Catholic Church of Jesus, I render all spirits impotent...")

    Deliverance Prayers II  The Minor Exorcisms and Deliverance Prayers compiled by Fr Chad Ripperger: Breastplate of St. Patrick (Modified) I bind (myself, or N.) today to a strong virtue, an invocation of the Trinity. I believe in a Threeness, with a confession of an Oneness in the Creator of the Universe. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of Christ’s birth with his baptism, to the virtue of his crucifixion with his burial, to the virtue of his resurrection with his ascension, to the virtue of his coming to the Judgment of Doom. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of ranks of Cherubim, in obedience of Angels, in service of Archangels, in hope of resurrection for reward, in prayers of Patriarchs, in preaching of Apostles, in faiths of confessors, in innocence of Holy Virgins, in deeds of righteous men. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of Heaven, in light of Sun, in brightness of Snow, in splendor of Fire, in speed of l...

5 Dubia Questions for 1P5's Steve Skojec & All faithful Catholics especially Francis is definitely Pope Cardinals, Bishops & pundits

Here are five really short and easy to answer dubia questions which hopefully aren't too complicated for Steve Skojec, publisher of the One Peter Five website, to answer. To make it really easy for the publisher of One Peter Five it has been formatted so that he only has to answer: yes or no. 1. Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales said "The Pope... when he is explicitly a heretic... the Church must either deprive him or as some say declare him deprived of his Apostolic See." Was St. Francis de Sales a Sedevacantist or a Benevacantist? Answer: yes or no. 2. "Universal Acceptance" theologian John of St. Thomas said "This man in particular lawfully elected and accepted by the Church is the supreme pontiff." Was John of St. Thomas for saying "the supreme pontiff" must be BOTH "lawfully elected and accepted by the Church" a Sedevacantist or a Benevacantist? Answer: yes or no. 3. Do you think that a "supreme pontiff...

Has the Trad Media fallen into a COVID-like mass formation with "the Uncola or 'UnFrancis'" Leo XVI? While it's humorous to see the former anti-Francis Trad pundits suddenly acting like teen age girls infatuated with Leo, it could lead to a Trojan Horse effect

May 2023-Cardinal Robert Prevost Honorary Doctorate from the Universidad Católica Santo Toribio de Mogrovejo (USAT). Posted by Elizabeth Yore... ... Frankly, it’s shocking and inconceivable that a newly elected pontiff would cite as his guiding light the theology of Joseph Bernardin, a known sexual predator and radical collaborator of Marxist and community activist, Saul Alinsky... ... Bernardin and the Alinsky... gave birth to the moral relativism of Bernardin’s seamless garment religion, which is referenced in Prevost’s speech. Prevost espouses the “seamless garment” radical ideology of Cardinal Joseph Bernardin , former Archbishop of Chicago. It is long overdue that American Catholics wake up about the real Joseph Bernardin . [ https://www.yorechildren.com/blog/2025/5/20/the-chicago-way] It is difficult to capture all the arresting insights of Desmet’s rewarding book, which includes the startling claim that [COVID] tyrannical leaders are, very often,  themselves  captive t...