Skip to main content

@NovusOrdoWatch BREAKING: #Vigano actually showed up at #Vatican DDF office in Rome today to face schism charges: "America has learned that Archbishop Viganó presented himself this afternoon, June 20, and deposited his written defense..."


BREAKING: #Vigano actually showed up at #Vatican DDF office in Rome today to face schism charges: "America has learned that Archbishop Viganó presented himself this afternoon, June 20, and deposited his written defense..." - americamagazine.org/faith/2024/06/ #catholictwitter #popefrancis

Comments

Renato said…
Archbishop Viganò was conditionally reconsecrated by Bishop Williamson, who is recognized as excommunicated from the Church. So that was an act, in itself, schismatic. He never denied this reconsecration; and Wikipedia reports what happened in January 2014. Viganò was consecrated bishop by the hands of a legitimate pope in 1992.

Fred Martinez said…
Wikipedia is a DEEP State propaganda unite for disinformation. Even you should know that.

I've heard this allegation by extreme anti-Vigano Damian Thomspon,but like you I didn't see any stolid proof.
Renato said…
Fred, I even understand you.

But if there is a disinformation campaign about him, then why doesn't he debunk that disinformation himself?

Why doesn't he deny Wikipedia, for example, and others who say the same thing?

He had the chance to deny this to an Italian journalist very close to him, but he didn't even do it.

The problem that creates all of this to this day is Viganò himself.

We may deepen his going to Rome someday; I think, however, in advance that all this will create more confusion in the Church.

Fred Martinez said…
Good points, Renato.

Popular posts from this blog

Fr. Chad Ripperger's Breastplate of St. Patrick (Modified) & Binding Prayer ("In the Name of Jesus Christ, our Lord and God, and by the power of the Most Holy Catholic Church of Jesus, I render all spirits impotent...")

    Deliverance Prayers II  The Minor Exorcisms and Deliverance Prayers compiled by Fr Chad Ripperger: Breastplate of St. Patrick (Modified) I bind (myself, or N.) today to a strong virtue, an invocation of the Trinity. I believe in a Threeness, with a confession of an Oneness in the Creator of the Universe. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of Christ’s birth with his baptism, to the virtue of his crucifixion with his burial, to the virtue of his resurrection with his ascension, to the virtue of his coming to the Judgment of Doom. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of ranks of Cherubim, in obedience of Angels, in service of Archangels, in hope of resurrection for reward, in prayers of Patriarchs, in preaching of Apostles, in faiths of confessors, in innocence of Holy Virgins, in deeds of righteous men. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of Heaven, in light of Sun, in brightness of Snow, in splendor of Fire, in speed of l...

"Well, 'either one gives up the scapular or they give up immodesty'. The point is they cannot coexist."

By Mary's Secretary In my book  The Practice of the Presence of Mary: To Live and Die with Mary , I dedicated Part II to Our Lady of Mount Carmel and Her scapular (fitting as Her feast is approaching), and I specifically mentioned how the scapular and spaghetti straps DO NOT go together. What I mean by that is I have noticed that those in the Church who DO NOT follow the Catholic dress code typically aren’t the ones wearing the scapular. I went on to say that modesty and the scapular go together and if you ever  were  immodest in dress, the scapular, being Our Lady’s sacramental that it is, gives one the grace to BECOME modest.  I can attest to this in my own life. Only after I was enrolled in the scapular did I begin, little by little, become modest. It’s a process. Kind of like the rosary quote, “one either gives up the sin or they give up the rosary.” Well, “either one gives up the scapular or they give up immodesty”. The point is they cannot coexist. In fact...

5 Dubia Questions for 1P5's Steve Skojec & All faithful Catholics especially Francis is definitely Pope Cardinals, Bishops & pundits

Here are five really short and easy to answer dubia questions which hopefully aren't too complicated for Steve Skojec, publisher of the One Peter Five website, to answer. To make it really easy for the publisher of One Peter Five it has been formatted so that he only has to answer: yes or no. 1. Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales said "The Pope... when he is explicitly a heretic... the Church must either deprive him or as some say declare him deprived of his Apostolic See." Was St. Francis de Sales a Sedevacantist or a Benevacantist? Answer: yes or no. 2. "Universal Acceptance" theologian John of St. Thomas said "This man in particular lawfully elected and accepted by the Church is the supreme pontiff." Was John of St. Thomas for saying "the supreme pontiff" must be BOTH "lawfully elected and accepted by the Church" a Sedevacantist or a Benevacantist? Answer: yes or no. 3. Do you think that a "supreme pontiff...