Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
Comments
And the evidence demonstrates this about Donald Trump as well. Trump is linked to Russian oligarchs, the latter are connected to Putin, all committed to the New York-based Chabad Lubavitch, who in the end are close to Netanyahu.
There are two links that clarifies more about this.
The first about Chabab, which is also simply known by that name:
https://seemorerocks.substack.com/p/shedding-a-light-on-chabad-lubavitch-f1b
And second about Trump and the Russians:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PpFbAUyaZcI
And this can all be deeper, but it will reveal darker things.
It would be very good for Trump to be committed to the truth; In a recent interview, however, given to a television network, he was categorical with a commitment to declassify secret files, for example, on Esptein if he is president...
We must pray a lot in these dark times for God to enlighten us.