Skip to main content

"Joe Rogan was called an antisemite for commenting on..Soros..The lesson? Self-identified Jews who support liberal, globalist causes are beyond all criticism, and those who dare to point out their evil ways are destined to be denounced"

AKA Catholic (Louie Verrecchio)
Antisemitism Awareness: Attempt to silence God

Comments

Renato said…
It is good to always remember that Christ came into the world to bear witness to the truth (John 18:37). As the author of the article says, one should not deny revealing the truth, even if many deny it.

Wilhelm Marr was a German Jewish mentor who spawned the term anti-Semitism. This pretext was created by him for the sake of the founding of the Jewish state, with a secret society which he himself will found; the simple German Jews were forced to go to Palestine, though many against their will. In short, he plotted a class struggle between them to this end.

This later the Zionist bankers bankrolled Hitler, sacrificing the Jewish people themselves, to go to this planned destination.

The modus operandi is always the same.

Therefore, it is a plan elaborated in a dialectic that every order can be changed to generate chaos in order to bring about a new order in the world, which is Gnostic.

Perhaps these demonstrations are in order to provoke yet another new exodus of the Jewish people, in this Kabbalistic mentality that is the worst gnosis that exists, now to leave America already divided and destroyed.

But the certainty is that there will be persecutions because of those who want to witness to the truth as well.

---

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilhelm_Marr

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJCzVV5eIg8


2:36 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more