Skip to main content

Prominent Catholics urge bishops, cardinals to declare Francis has ‘lost the papal office’ if he refuses to resign.."Francis’ 'record of protecting sexual abusers which 'exemplifies his character and modus operandi.' The signatories accuse Francis of committing 'crimes other than heresy'"

Prominent Catholics urge bishops, cardinals to declare Francis has ‘lost the papal office’ if he refuses to resign

The seventeen signatories comprise a mixture of academics, activists in various spheres of ecclesial life, and one priest: 

  • Rev. Linus F. Clovis, Ph. D., MSc, JCL, STB
  • Yves Daoudal: Editor-in-chief of Reconquête and Vice-President of the Charlier Center
  • Dániel Fülep: Theologian, Hungary
  • Maria Guarini: Editor, Chiesa e post concilio
  • Michael Kakooza, Ph. D.: Strategic Management, Eastern Africa
  • Thaddeus J. Kozinski, Ph. D.: Professor of Philosophy, Memoria College
  • Peter A. Kwasniewski, Ph. D.
  • John R.T. Lamont, DPhil
  • John Rist, Ph. D.: Professor of Classics and early Christian Philosophy and Theology (ret.)
  • Dr Cesar Felix Sánchez Martínez: Professor of Philosophy, Universidad Nacional de San Agustin, Peru
  • Wolfram Schrems, Mag. theol., Mag. phil.
  • Peter Stephan, Dr. phil. habil: Professor of Architecture Theory & Art History, University of Applied Sciences, Potsdam
  • Anna Silvas, Ph. D.: Specialist in Greek Fathers, UNE, Australia (ret.)
  • John-Henry Westen, M.A.: Founder and Editor, LifeSiteNews
  • Michael Wiitala, Ph. D.: Associate Lecturer in Philosophy, Cleveland State University
  • Elizabeth F. Yore, Esq.: Founder, Yore Children
  • John Zmirak, Ph. D.: Senior Editor, The Stream

The lengthy statement presents a summary of his interactions and dealings with a number of high-profile figures in the Church, such as Cardinals Godfried Danneels, Reinhard Marx, Theodore McCarrick, Wilton Gregory, and Víctor Manuel Fernández. The extensive list of individuals presented by the signatories, they state, is part of Francis’ “record of protecting sexual abusers” which “exemplifies his character and modus operandi.” 

The signatories accuse Francis of committing “crimes other than heresy,” attesting that the actions listed are “crimes because they violate either canon law, the law of temporal states, the natural law, divine positive law, or some combination of laws from these different legal systems.”

Comments

Anonymous said…
The idea that council can depose a legitimate pope is an error. The correct response is to realize he is not a legitimate pope at the moment and perhaps never was.
12:14 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more