Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
Comments
This dialectic shown by Antony Sutton, which was made possible thanks to American industry sending weapons to the Orientals, is part of this. So everything seems to be a sabotage of the West that culminates in the advance of the East. But both East and West are being manipulated by intellectual mentors to this end. There are no angels either on the side or the other. For this reason, an Alexander Dugin threatens the West covertly in the face of Vladimir Putin's interview with Tucker Carlson. Meanwhile, an old, senile man like Biden is a perfect puppet to justify an insanity against the East.
All this gives further reason why we should place our hope in God alone.
https://www.countdowntothekingdom.com/blessed-elena-aiello-russia-will-march-upon-europe/