Skip to main content

LifeSite News Pope Francis ‘is very much in favor of the female diaconate,’ claims nun invited to address Vatican cardinals

Comments

Anonymous said…
So it would not be at all surprising if the future pope in this Church elected was Fernández, whose name would be Pope John XXIV, as it was a name chosen by Bergoglio before. It wouldn't matter to them if the likely candidate chose a name for his pontificate.

If Ratzinger was the right-hand man and Wojtyla, then Fernández would be Bergoglio's left-hand man, because the correct side to designate loyalty matters little. The important thing is to follow a reverse but similar path in order to deceive.

Because it is known to all that there is a plan for a mixed conclave, that is, not only with the cardinal electors. If it is already said that it does not care whether or not there are legitimate cardinal electors for a new conclave, then why should it care about it too?

Pope Benedict XVI had given a speech at the 2005 conclave condemning this same relativism in the face of Martini, known as the "antipope" whose St. Gallen Mafia to which he belonged gained power from one of its members later, Bergoglio. And he demonstrated the signs of the Antichrist through false homosexual marriage as a dictatorship of the same relativism that is revealed in this Anti-Church.

The Church and the Anti-Church are two clearly distinct things, but that matters little. The important thing is to expel the pornographic Fernandez together with the pornographic Bergoglio, although reality would try to say that the important thing is to leave the communion of the Church of the pornography of the two.

[more]
Anonymous said…
But this same relativism is also demonstrated in those who have authority in the clergy who were once Catholic, because the important thing for them today is to resist all this. They forget that the Gospel says, "Without me you can do nothing" (John 5:15).

Few of the clergy were the exception to understand the Universi Dominici Gregis, in the example of a simple Italian parish priest named Ramon Guidetti.

The path is one of the cross and will demand a lot from every Catholic if he wants to remain in the Church. There is no room for indifferentism or relativism in the faith today in the Church itself.

"I know you and your works, I know that you are neither cold nor hot. It would be better if you were cold or hot! So, because you are lukewarm, neither cold nor hot, I am about to vomit you out of my mouth" (Revelation 13:15-16).
Anonymous said…
* All this is quite logical and consistent with this ongoing metamorphosis in this Church. Because it is part of relativism whose doctrine and immutable norms of the law of the true Church are despised.

----

* The first paragraph above was omitted above, unintentionally, by me. Forgive me, but I use Word to better ration, write and then paste when they are longer.

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...