Skip to main content

@DineshDSouza Navalny=Trump. The plan of the Biden regime & the Democrats is to ensure their leading political opponent dies in prison. There’s no real difference between the two cases


Navalny=Trump. The plan of the Biden regime and the Democrats is to ensure their leading political opponent dies in prison. There’s no real difference between the two cases

Comments

Anonymous said…
The Russian dialectic that Max adopted comes from Hegel, which consists of manipulating minds for a certain ideology. Everyone can search the Internet for the words of Yuri Bezmenov and compare this subversion of ideology in the country today. and to see whether or not it is true that ideologies for people to be "woke" or sympathetic today to the "gay movement" are Marxist tools of subversion in society so that the same society can end its own order in its own country. Putin comes from a Gnostic state in which materialist dialectics imposes a dictatorship as a condition above natural law and above true faith.
Fred Martinez said…
David Sacks

@DavidSacks
While declaring war on authoritarianism, the [Marxist?] Biden regime seeks to jail their main political opponent Trump and punish Elon for allowing freedom of speech. The hypocrisy is glaring. But if they don’t pay a price in the November elections, they will go much much further.
Quote
Elon Musk

@elonmusk
·
7h
The public still doesn’t understand even a tiny fraction of the power of the censorship government-industrial complex.

As predicted, my companies and I came under relentless attack the moment the censorship of this platform was lifted.

How far will they go to stop me? x.com/davidsacks/sta…
Show more
1:06 PM · Feb 16, 2024
·
324.6K
Views
Fred Martinez said…

Newt Gingrich
@newtgingrich
Navalnys death in prison is a brutal reminder that jailing your political opponents is inhumane and a violation of every principle of a free society. Watch the [Marxist?] Biden Administration speak out against Putin and his jailing of his leading political opponent while Democrats in four different jurisdictions try to turn President Trump into an American Navalny. The hypocrisy and corruption of the left is astonishing.
9:52 AM · Feb 16, 2024
·
49.3K
Views
Fred Martinez said…
Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald Just 3 weeks ago, a US citizen who was imprisoned by Ukraine for criticizing Zelensky died in prison at 55: few of our über-patriots cared.
Anonymous said…
The conscious Marxist struggle at its core in the class struggle always produces a dialectical and antagonistic deepening. The important thing is the confrontation between individuals in the same society: women against men, whites against blacks, heterosexuals against homosexuals, etc. Capitalism, being liberal and without moral principles, will logically lead a socialist society to the apex and a communist revolution. It is interesting to remember that liberal and Marxist and capitalist principles are revolutionary in origin of the French Revolution. The country should greatly seek an understanding in this regard and other ways to concentrate on an opposite resolution so as not to come to this sad end. Former Russian agent Bezmenov says religion must be that pillar to maintain the unity of any country.
Anonymous said…
But even the Catholic religion itself was orchestrated for this very purpose. And that was with a lot of communist-minded seminarians coming into the seminaries.
Anonymous said…
We must pray and do penance this Lent especially to our West, for Our Lady clearly says that Russia would be the punishment of the continent. And the same Mother of God said that the same Russia would spread its errors throughout the world.
Anonymous said…
Dugin represents this dialectic perfectly that began with Max and that spreads the errors to the world.

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...