Skip to main content

Ironic: [Francis is definitely the pope] Kennedy Hall @kennedyhall Popesplainers prey on the ignorance of Catholics (and I don't mean intentional or willful ignorance)...

Post

Conversation

Kennedy Hall
@kennedyhall
Popesplainers prey on the ignorance of Catholics (and I don't mean intentional or willful ignorance) For example, they will go after a trad by appealing to some canon from a council, but even councils have context and are directed toward certain realities. In addition, they perform leaps of logic that the average person can't grasp without study. Example, so and so says "that pachamama thing was bad," and the splainer replies "well, that is a heresy to say that because the first see is judged by no one!" See what happened there? No one "judged" the pope in any way that relates to a particular definition, but instead judged an action of the pope as being -- at least in the external -- clearly egregious. Ultimately, the splainers put the pope in a category of man who cannot be judged by reason, as it is an irrational and cultish mindset.
Last edited
4,451
Views

Kennedy Hall
@kennedyhall
This guy masquerades as a traditionalist but he’s just a popesplaining theological nitwit. What an obtuse and ignorant statement. He doesn’t even understand what the word undermine means.
Quote
Catholic Orca🇻🇦
@CatholicOrca
You can’t be catholic and hold to this position. A valid Pope cannot undermine the deposit of the faith
Image
22.3K
Views

Comments

Anonymous said…
All prelates were to recite a mea culpa. All this begins with the expulsion of Benedict XVI from the Chair of St. Peter. Bergoglio assumed the Petrine throne without Petrine munus. He took over alongside a still-living pope who abdicated only the ministry. But that wasn't a substantial mistake. This is where discernment comes in. If there can be no separation of the office from the Petrine ministry, then logic says that there has been a total impediment to the Petrine office against Ratzinger. This is the only way that one understands and makes sense of what Benedict XVI did, because the Code of Canon Law also speaks about this possibility. That is why Universo Dominici Gregis speaks of the necessity of the abdication of canon 332.2. This apostolic constitution is an antidote to usurpation. The legitimate cardinals must recognize the error and analyze it. One should not be taken for excuses and thus cling to the past. They must act today.

Renato
7:30 AM
Anonymous said…
I still don't understand how this is not fideism: the idea that we can only be certain somebody is an antipope if authority says so. I don't understand how such an idea is "traditional": traditional treatises on dogmatic theology do not support it. If they did St Bernard would not be a saint.

People like Father Kramer are in the minority and it just makes you ask if traditional Catholics even know the faith.
7:51 AM
Anonymous said…
The Apostolic Tradition comes from the testimony of the first apostles entrusted by Jesus Christ himself. Today this apostasy has led to another tradition in the Church that is not Christian. It is the same way as exchanging divine commandments for human precepts. Jesus fought Kabbalah, which means tradition. This mentality is Gnostic. It all comes from a pessimistic mentality that says matter is a bad thing. So the other gospel that is occult says that the papacy is evil and so is the divine institution. We must free ourselves from this by seeking a thesis, an antithesis until we arrive at a liberating synthesis. Christ revealed the Gospel through the logos, that is, in the logical way of understanding the truth. It is the opposite of those who seek the irrational path, even though they say they are Catholics. Today there are only two paths in these times. Either the way of good or evil.
8:52 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fr. Chad Ripperger's Breastplate of St. Patrick (Modified) & Binding Prayer ("In the Name of Jesus Christ, our Lord and God, and by the power of the Most Holy Catholic Church of Jesus, I render all spirits impotent...")

    Deliverance Prayers II  The Minor Exorcisms and Deliverance Prayers compiled by Fr Chad Ripperger: Breastplate of St. Patrick (Modified) I bind (myself, or N.) today to a strong virtue, an invocation of the Trinity. I believe in a Threeness, with a confession of an Oneness in the Creator of the Universe. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of Christ’s birth with his baptism, to the virtue of his crucifixion with his burial, to the virtue of his resurrection with his ascension, to the virtue of his coming to the Judgment of Doom. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of ranks of Cherubim, in obedience of Angels, in service of Archangels, in hope of resurrection for reward, in prayers of Patriarchs, in preaching of Apostles, in faiths of confessors, in innocence of Holy Virgins, in deeds of righteous men. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of Heaven, in light of Sun, in brightness of Snow, in splendor of Fire, in speed of l...
3 comments
Read more

5 Dubia Questions for 1P5's Steve Skojec & All faithful Catholics especially Francis is definitely Pope Cardinals, Bishops & pundits

Here are five really short and easy to answer dubia questions which hopefully aren't too complicated for Steve Skojec, publisher of the One Peter Five website, to answer. To make it really easy for the publisher of One Peter Five it has been formatted so that he only has to answer: yes or no. 1. Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales said "The Pope... when he is explicitly a heretic... the Church must either deprive him or as some say declare him deprived of his Apostolic See." Was St. Francis de Sales a Sedevacantist or a Benevacantist? Answer: yes or no. 2. "Universal Acceptance" theologian John of St. Thomas said "This man in particular lawfully elected and accepted by the Church is the supreme pontiff." Was John of St. Thomas for saying "the supreme pontiff" must be BOTH "lawfully elected and accepted by the Church" a Sedevacantist or a Benevacantist? Answer: yes or no. 3. Do you think that a "supreme pontiff...
96 comments
Read more

UPDATE: Fr. Ripperger's Prayer Recommendation for the Election: He Calls It "The Most Efficatious Prayer in Crushing Diabolical Influence In the Area of Oppression"!

During a recent interview on the Grace Force Podcast on YouTube, Exorcist Fr. Chad Ripperger   provided updated information that the prayers he officially recommends  for the laity to say with regard to the election, President Trump and our country  are the two  prayers posted below.  https://youtu.be/UKrLr4jW0Eo First of all, it is very important to start by saying that the usual means of receiving merit and graces are of paramount importance. That is, remain in a state of grace, recite the rosary daily, attend Mass as frequently as possible, receiving frequent communion, and frequent confession.  Father Ripperger mentions that we should offer all these things up and ultimately to be praying for an "honest, fair, and just election"..."and "for Trump's protection."  He references his book,  Deliverance Prayers: for Use by the Laity,  and states, "there is a prayer, and this is the one that I'm going to recommend because it's the one...
Post a Comment
Read more