Skip to main content

@EdwardPentin..STRICKLAND: “..I can't quote directly that he said [the deposit of faith] doesn't exist, but it definitely wasn't an emphasis.. ‘Quit emphasizing this so much and get with the program.’...

Sanoj Thomas and Dari liked
Edward Pentin
@EdwardPentin
RAYMOND ARROYO: “Some outlets have been reporting that, when you met with Cardinal Pierre at the Nunciature in Washington, he said something to you to the effect of: ‘The Holy Father is watching you […] You need to stop talking about the deposit of faith. There is no deposit of faith.’ Do you recall an exchange like that?   BISHOP STRICKLAND: “Well, that was from a couple of years ago, and to be a little more precise about it, I wouldn't say His Eminence then, he was Archbishop two years ago, but His Eminence, Christophe Pierre, basically [said]: ‘Quit emphasizing this deposit of faith so much. It's not what we need to focus on.’ I can't quote directly that he said [the deposit of faith] doesn't exist, but it definitely wasn't an emphasis, and that's what they were telling me two years ago: ‘Quit emphasizing this so much and get with the program.’ It's what I heard. I mean, he didn't use those words, but that's what I heard. And with this, what happened a week ago, His Eminence basically said it was sort of: ‘You didn't get the warning two years ago, Pope Francis has made his decision: You need to be relieved of your work as Bishop of Tyler.’ I said I can't resign. I said I respect that, yes, the Holy Father, as Supreme Pontiff, has the authority, if he chooses to, to remove me from that office, and he did choose to do so.” youtu.be/jlh1Y5GsMmI?si
@BishStrickland
@RaymondArroyo
@WorldOverLive
Image
Last edited
26.3K
Views

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more