Canon 212: "Where's Peter? rag smears 'anti-Catholic' Fr. James Altman for his compelling, plain-spoken case against unholy Francis's papal validity"

Where's Peter? rag smears 'anti-Catholic' Fr. James Altman for his compelling, plain-spoken case against unholy Francis's papal validity [https://canon212.com//]

Comments

Anonymous said…

Father Altman's critics do not seek a sincere question of whether to support his position of calling Bergoglio an antipope. If the critic seeks several canons against the priest, then why does he not seek the same canons against Bergoglio? Canon 332:2 says that the pope must abdicate the munus, for example. But Benedict XVI reported that he abdicated only the exercise of office, which can also be interpreted as ministry. Why then doesn't he and others analyze all this? If he and others did so, John Paul II's Universi Dominici Gregis would be very clear in Article 76. But if there was really an interest on their part in the pursuit of good for the Church. All truth must be turned only to the glory of God.

Renato

1:38 PM

Anonymous said…

Pray for them. Jesus is going to come in the future (after?) the abomination of desolation. Remember, the Pharisees rejected Him (following the Jewish priests, who sat on the chair of Moses). Was their obedience to religious authorities permissible? We know that sodomy is against the natural law regardless of what is decided next month/next year.

4:18 AM

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ? On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace. The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...

The Catholic Monitor

Search This Blog