Skip to main content

@DC_Draino..ABC/WaPo poll showing Trump up 10..Deep State PR campaign..Menendez..bribery charges ..Newsom..Michelle.. [Obama] de facto 4th & 5th terms


Media is pulling their hair out over this ABC/WaPo poll showing Trump up 10 over Biden, but I think there is something else going on What if the shock poll is part of the Deep State PR campaign to pressure Biden to drop out? Think about recent events: Hunter was indicted this month on gun charges (Joe not implicated) Bob Menendez was indicted on bribery charges (shot across the bow that says “we’re prosecuting Democrat corruption so you better do what we say”) Multiple recent articles and opinion pieces from Democrats talking about Joe’s weaknesses And now this Trump landslide poll from the WaPo, which is notoriously known for being a Deep State PR rag I think the more Joe holds on and won’t drop out, the more intense the heat will get Soon we’ll see more polls showing a Trump blowout Hunter may have additional indictments pertaining to his corruption that could start to implicate Joe Many believe Gavin Newsom vetoed that trans kid custody bill to prep his run for POTUS Barack is lurking in the shadows waiting to drop Michelle in the race and get his de facto 4th and 5th terms I’m a staunch Trump supporter and not even I fully believe the 10pt poll (although that’s probably what the results would look like with honest elections) so I think there is something else at play here
Quote
InteractivePolls
@IAPolls2022
🇺🇲 2024 GE: ABC/WP POLL (A) (R) Trump 52% (+10) (D) Biden 42% Independents (R) Trump 52% (+13) (D) Biden 39% ABC/WP (A) | n=890 RV | 9/15-20 washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/
Image
Image
Image
Image

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...