Skip to main content

FAUCI CALLS FOR LOCKDOWNS TO FORCE VACCINATIONS

FAUCI CALLS FOR LOCKDOWNS TO FORCE VACCINATIONS

Comments

Anonymous said…
It’s unbelievable that with so much of information at their fingertips people still call satanic bankers and the new world order a crazy conspiracy theory. Aaron Russo told us more than fifteen years ago what they are planning. You will need a vaccine certificate to prove you are not a threat to society. Eventually all record can only be accessed via a digital id chip.
11:59 AM
Anonymous said…
Eris, the "new viral threat," is part of Greek mythology that is known as the mother of discord and bears her children, according to Wikipedia, below:

“In Hesiod's Theogony (226–232), Eris, the daughter of Night, is less kindly spoken of as she brings forth other personifications as her children:
And hateful Eris bore painful Ponos (Hardship),
Lethe (Forgetfulness) and Limos (Starvation) and the tearful Algea (Pains),
Hysminai (Battles), Makhai (Wars), Phonoi (Murders), and Androktasiai (Manslaughters);
Neikea (Quarrels), Pseudea (Lies), Logoi (Stories), Amphillogiai (Disputes),
Dysnomia (Anarchy) and Ate (Ruin), near one another,
and Horkos (Oath), who most afflicts men on earth,
Then willing swears a false oath”.

We realize above that it is in accordance with the psychological and traumatic effects of blockages imposed by an unhealthy and evil mentality on a defenseless population. This is beyond reason and sense. So Fauci demonstrates something possessive and diabolical that is coherent, that he's busy and even removed a pope and dominates the Vatican today.

To accept this is the same as to be complicit in a hidden and contrary power of God.
12:40 PM
Anonymous said…
Really logic is a digital identification which the individual "cannot sell or buy" (Revelation 13; 19) except for it. In this way, vaccination is a mechanism of the system in order to freedom to public and private places. This demonstrates that the individual is not a threat to society. A clear control and submission through a tyrannical state. According to Nicolas Credo:

“One app to rule them all? More like one concept. A digital ID that creates a permission-based society, allowing ‘freedom’ of movement only if the individual possesses the requisite social credit score. The digital ID looks set to include medical records (vaxxeeens), carbon footprints, and of course the central bank digital currency tokens. The tokens could be frozen due to bad behaviour deemed anti-government. The tokens could be allocated for certain foods (insects) and disallow other indulgences (meat & alcohol). For now, downloading an app in order to enter this UK supermarket piloting a QR code system is a choice. In the future it may not be. All your purchasing habits tracked and monitored in real time. No app = no food. Welcome to the beginnings of the digital gulag.”

Therefore, each day it becomes evident what plan "X" means.

1:16 PM
Anonymous said…
At airports there is also now the requirement of facial identification which is also part of this same mechanism. I mean, it's part of the same agenda.
1:22 PM
Anonymous said…

Agenda "X" in progress...

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/4Cx5xugqBeA
1:28 PM
Anonymous said…
Musk and his "X" app that will serve for everything and that is very similar to China's WeChat.

https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-x-everything-app-twitter-details-2022-10?inline-endstory-related-recommendations=
2:51 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more