Skip to main content

Andrea Cionci: "The Holy Father [Benedict XVI] , of whom we have been saying for two years that he is impeded, has chosen from 73 biblical books the only one in which the expression 'I am impeded' appears"


Canori Mora
@CanoriMora
It is a blessing to be detached from the Bergoglian Antichurch!
Quote Tweet
Edward Pentin
@EdwardPentin
Report: Archbishop Gänswein Ordered to Leave Vatican, Return to Home Diocese Without New Role ncregister.com/cna/report-arc @AC_Wimmer @CNAdeutsch
63
Views
Anonymous said…
Pope Benedict XVI was forced out of the Chair of St. Peter, so he was arrested, conforms to the prophecies of Our Lady of Good Success, and thus prevented from governing. Bishop Gaenswein once expressed the words of Pope Benedict XVI during the presentation of a book in Lumsa, Italy: "You can believe, or not believe. If you don't believe it, the answer lies in the book of Jeremiah or Isaiah. I'm not going to say which chapter or verse." But in a search, we can see that the chapter is the 36th and the verse is the 5th: "Then Jeremiah commanded Baruch, "I am hindered, and I cannot enter the temple of the Lord."

Renato [https://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2023/06/flashback-is-it-possible-that-vatican.html?showComment=1685915378820#c4447287511941632606]

And so, last Thursday, he sent the most faithful Archbishop Gänswein to Lumsa to present the book by the atheist mathematician Piergiorgio Odifreddi accompanied by a few pages by Benedict XVI, about which we have already written  HERE  .

First of all, Archbishop Gänswein began with a wonderful amphibology: “ Before coming here I prayed with Pope Benedict, as every Catholic priest does, at vespers. And that says it all". HERE 

In fact: it says it all. The skilful construction of the sentence means that it can also be understood perfectly as: “Before coming here, I prayed vespers, as a true Catholic priest does, that is, IN UNION WITH POPE BENEDICT” . So he is telling the priests of the Sodality that they are right to remain una cum with Pope Benedict. HERE “In English” to read the entire discussion of the sentence, with the contribution of prof. Gian Matteo Corrias.

But let's get to the heart of the matter and let Msgr. Gänswein continues, as shown in the video HERE  : " Pope Benedict told me, first of all:" Do not make an institutional greeting, give a personal greeting from me and tell everyone: ' I did not deserved this illustrious list of presenters' . I said to him: "Holy Father, if I say this they don't believe me, but I obey"; «Either you believe or you don't believe, if you do not believe you read, either Jeremiah or Isaiah. I don't say which verse and which chapter, but there is the answer»”.

By now accustomed to the language of the Holy Father, we jumped at the reference to Scripture typical of the Ratzinger Code which, as you know, fully follows the communicative method of Jesus HERE “In English” .

We will let you imagine the jolt when, in chapter 36, verse 5, the writer reads the sentence:

“Then Jeremiah ordered Baruch:” I AM IMPEDITED and I cannot go into the temple of the Lord."

The Holy Father, of whom we have been saying for two years that he is impeded, has chosen from 73 biblical books the only one in which the expression "I am impeded" appears. - Andrea Cionci [https://sfero.me/article/from-the-book-of-jeremiah-the-definitive-ratzinger-code-of-benedict-xvi-i-am-impeded]

Canori Mora
@CanoriMora
With the report yesterday from Andrea Cionci: "From the Book of Jeremiah, the definitive Ratzinger Code of Benedict XVI: "I am impeded"." - this being an unequivocal statement via the "Code", it no doubt will continue to be ignored; except for those who "have ears to hear". 3/


Comments

Anonymous said…
Benedict XVI separated the wheat from the chaff. The Church and the Anti-Church. I see that few persevere in this gesture of the deceased pope.

Renato
3:54 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more