Skip to main content

Francis is in SCHISM from ALL Valid Popes in History who Reject his Sacrilege of Communion for Adulterers

 Pope vs church – the anatomy of a Catholic civil war | The Spectator  Australia

Pope vs church – the anatomy of a ...

Remember when Francis and his collaborators cry "SCHISM" it means they are AFRAID!

What are they afraid of?

They are AFRAID that it will finally get through the cowardly and apparently not too bright heads of the few faithful bishops that:

Zero valid popes in the history of the Catholic Church have committed the sacrilege of instituting as the Vatican's official teaching that unrepentant adulterous couples can profane the Holy of Holy Jesus Christ who is true God by having unrepentant sinners receive Him in the Most Holy Eucharist.

Nor have any of ALL the valid popes in history even come close to ambiguously teaching such a blasphemy which could be taken in either a orthodox or heretical way (for all the conservative and traditionalist Francis apologists).

Next to this sacrilege against the Most Holy Eucharist, the proposed Amazonian Synod heresy of women's ordination is a minor sacrilege.

Maybe these cowardly and apparently not too bright bishops might, finally, realize:

Francis is in SCHISM from ALL valid popes in the history of the Catholic Church.

Maybe they will, finally, join Bishop René Gracida and investigate if the Francis conclave was invalid which even Cardinal Raymond Burke says is a valid possibly.

Or, maybe because it is their infallible belief that there can never be a invalid pope or antipope then they will do what Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales said:

"The Pope... when he is explicitly a heretic... the Church must either deprive him or as some say declare him deprived of his Apostolic See."
(The Catholic Controversy by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.

Note:

-  LifeSiteNews, "Confusion explodes as Pope Francis throws magisterial weight behind communion for adulterers," December 4, 2017:

The AAS guidelines explicitly allows "sexually active adulterous couples facing 'complex circumstances' to 'access the sacraments of Reconciliation and the Eucharist.'"

-  On February 2018, in Rorate Caeli, Catholic theologian Dr. John Lamont:

"The AAS statement... establishes that Pope Francis in Amoris Laetitia has affirmed propositions that are heretical in the strict sense."

- On December 2, 2017, Bishop Rene Gracida:

"Francis' heterodoxy is now official. He has published his letter to the Argentina bishops in Acta Apostlica Series making those letters magisterial documents."

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church by the bishops by the grace of God.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Has the church declared Francis to be a heretic? Has any council been gathered to try to depose him? Nope.

You sound like the sedevacantists, even use their arguments (that have been refuted by Mr. John Salza on trueorfalsepope.com).
Debbie said…
You're funny anonymous. The whole world is going to hell and the Church (the magisterium) has done nothing to stop the decay these past 60+ years, most especially within the Church Herself.

As the Church goes, so does the world. It's not rocket science and Fred has said nothing that isn't true or difficult to see.
T said…
It is doctrine that God hives enough grace to avoid sin, both mortal and venial. Read it in Denzinger’s Sources of Dogma during Lent.
Anonymous said…
First anon:

Surely you understand the distinction between legal truth and ontological truth? Even canon law cannot contravene divine law? God has no need for anyone to declare something for it to be actually true.
Anonymous said…

@Debbie: You are funny too. Fred has good points, but what you fail to see is that Freddy, Ann Barnhardt, Patrick Coffin etc do not speak for the Catholic church, they have no authority at all in the church to declare anything such as Benedict is still Pope. Their personal opinions are just that opinions to share. You are all going to fall into sedevacantism once Benedict is gone. I don't like modernism in the church just like you don't, but there's only so much one can do that is not part of the hierarchy of the church.

The Church is a legal institution, the papacy is a legal office, jurisdiction is a legal power, heresy is a legal crime, and to lose a legal office requires a legal judgment by the requisite legal authority.

It's an over reaction to the crisis which has had the ironic effect of him leaving the Church which is how the devil has orchestrated the crisis.


The devil's key strategy is to lead souls out of the Roman Catholic Church and into the false church of tradition. There is no such thing as schism in this false church. Mission and ordinary jurisdiction are unnecessary. Even subjection to the Pope is unnecessary. It is a brilliant plan of Satan himself. These souls will be damned, or EENS is a meaningless dogma.
Anonymous said…
Correction to last post: "It's an over reaction to the crisis which has had the ironic effect of him leaving the Church which is how the devil has orchestrated the crisis."

I meant to say them instead of him, meaning Barnhardt and all the beneplenists.
Debbie said…
It's never, ever wrong to point out the emperor has no clothes. I feel sorry for those who are in "second" marriages and are receiving sacrilegious Communions because they believe Francis is Pope....he affirms them in their sins, just as Satan does. Beneplentism on the other hand could help those who are receiving sacrilegious Communions by forcing them to look at the arguments, see what the Church truly teaches about such unions, admit their error and repent. Insisting Francis is Pope (note, not being certain is NOT the same as insisting) is straight up indifference and we all know what Our Lord thinks about indifference.
T said…
Can no one think that 2+2=4 unless the math teacher says so? That is analogous to the situation. Whether someone has the authority to morally bind others to their ideas is irrelevant. I do understand when someone asks Taylor Marshall if he thinks Francis is an antipope nobody is asking for his legally authoritative judgement, because he has no authority.

Is it schismatic to be open to what the teacher will say but still in the meanwhile think 2+2 looks a lot like 4, spiritually speaking?
Anonymous said…
@Debbie you make fair points, but here's the issue...neither you nor Ann Barnhardt, Freddy and the others can prove that he's not the Pope. His conclave never had a legal challenge...so your argument falls apart right there. I don't like him saying that Lutherans are apart of the mystical body of Christ, I don't like him saying that good atheists go to heaven, etc. Francis is most likely going to be declared an Anti-Pope in 60-100 years if a traditional Pope is ever back on the Chair.

As Catholics, you and I (and the other Beneplenists) are not part of the formal hierarchy of the church. None of us have the authority to declare anything, so as part of the universal acceptance of Francis's conclave from the church you are then obligated as a Catholic to accept that he had a valid conclave that had been legal. He is to be accepted as the Pope then in that case because he's not been called out by any Cardinals to have a formal dubia against him. The dubia that the SSPX and others presented had been a very fair dubia, but it had no support from any Cardinals. Cardinal Burke has not once called for Francis to be declared a heretic, nor any of the so called traditional Cardinals out there.

Until that happens, you cannot declare Benedict to be the Pope, it is clear as day that his intention had been to resign the Papacy. In his Declaratio he says there's going to be sedevacante and a conclave is going to elect the next Pope. He cannot be the Pope anymore, as he isn't even naming Cardinals or doing anything from an administrative sort of function that a Pope has to do. He's retired and he did not even lead the consecration to Russia. Until Francis is declared by the church to be a heretic, your group/position has no leg to stand on.
Debbie said…
Anonymous "Francis is most likely going to be declared an Anti-Pope in 60-100 years if a traditional Pope is ever back on the Chair.'

Indeed. And so that means that right now, today in reality he is "most likely'an anti-pope.

Great! Then we agree. ☺️

The "formal hierarchy" (except Ab. Lefebvre) has done nothing to stop the rot (modernism) within the Church and Her institutions these past 60+ years and now we should sit on our hands and wait for the same said hierarchy to declare what is glaringly obvious? Obviously I, nor Ann nor Freddy can declare with any authority that Bergoglio is an anti-pope, but we certainly can voice our opinions....and then maybe, just maybe if enough people speak out the "conservative" cardinals will be emboldened to actually do something.
Anonymous said…
@Debbie

I'm not a fan of modernism...but I don't say that Francis is a definite Anti-Pope or formal heretic because he has not been declared by the church as one yet. Francis only backpedals if he's pressured to in some cases.

I don't think that Benedict is Pope at all anymore, and I don't say it lightly. Could it be a better alternative? No, because he's not even governing the church in any capacity. So to me it makes no sense to support Benedict is Pope because it's not like he's returning into St.Peter's and sitting on the chair and declaring his return as Roman Pontiff. He's done. He's retired. Pressure the Cardinals to act, Bishops ,etc.
Debbie said…
"Pressure the Cardinals to act, Bishops ,etc."

Yes! Once again we agree!

So raising our voices that point to the invalid resignation, and therefore Bergoglio being an anti-pope, is doing exactly what you suggest.....pressure the Cardinals etc.

Debbie said…
And even if what you say is correct....that Benedict won't return and is done....declaring his resignation invalid and he is still the pope (and most importantly that Bergoglio is not nor ever was) would help with the next conclave. If this isn't resolved before Benedict's and/or Bergoglio's death, the next (fake) conclave could be even worse than the (fake) 2013 one.

Popular posts from this blog

"Remember when Trump was up by 600,000 votes in Pennsylvania?": A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

  Matthew H @MattH_4America Remember when Trump was up by 600,000 votes in Pennsylvania? 1:07 PM · Jul 13, 2022 · Twitter Web App [https://twitter.com/MattH_4America/status/1547311877264400384] 10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborator

Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Francis teaches HERESY," now, the question is will he do a Skojec & a Schneider Cop Out

    Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation: "[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic , he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him , or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See." (The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306) Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Pope Francis teaches HERESY: Pope Pius XII condemned the heresy of Francis": Pope Francis on Feb 2 2022, taught, "that in Christ no one can ever truly separate us from those we love because the bond is an existential bond, a strong bond that is in our very nature...who have denied the faith, who are apostates." Pope Pius XII taught the exact opposite when he wrote of those: "who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or b

Alone Bishop Gracida openly proclaims "Resist!" & Actively Works towards the Removal of Francis

    "You cannot give Holy Communion to the abortionists, to the abortion promoters and providers, to the divorce and remarried. You cannot do it. St. Paul said you do not feed the Eucharist to dogs..."   "Right now they [the laity] are suffering in silence. They need to object. The laity, the sensus fidelium is that common sense among the laity who have accepted the magisterial teaching of the Church which is the foundation of their faith."     "Having accepted that when they hear something that is contradictory to the magisterial teaching of the Church, the sensus fidelium is a impulse that causes them to speak out and say no."     "That is not true. Don't say that. Stop! That is the sensus fidelium in action!"     "Not to sit and suffer in silence. That's crazy. That's weird. That's wrong. Speak up! Resist! " - Bishop Rene Gracida [ https://youtu.be/arF9TlUVfiU ] We are in the greatest crisis in the history