Before Biden, did Francis's Former Lead Advisor on Refugees Sutherland's Goldman Sachs Create the ILLEGAL US ALIEN INVASION?
Joe Biden has created the newest ILLEGAL US ALIEN INVASION in spades, but what previously created this invasion?
Francis's lead advisor on refugees, migration and the Vatican Bank reform Peter Sutherland died on January 7, 2018.
Who was Sutherland?
What type of advise did he give to Francis?
Did Sutherland's Goldman Sachs create the U. S. illegal alien invasion?
Here are the answers to the above questions:
The conservative New American Reported:
Former "chairman of Goldman Sachs International Peter Sutherland. Mr.
Sutherland, an Insider’s Insider among the globalist banking
establishment, was brought in to help “reform” the Vatican Bank, which
was akin to putting Dracula in charge of the blood bank...
Sutherland is a prominent political figure who is regularly described in
media accounts as a “practicing Catholic,” which means he wears his
religion when it is expedient to do so. As attorney general of Ireland,
Sutherland helped to scuttle that Catholic country’s legal restrictions
on abortion and favored the “LGBT rights” movement..."
"Here are some of his other globalist credentials, as previously in The New American:
Even the extreme leftist Progressive Labor Party (PLP) said:
"The
Pope’s lead advisor on the current refugee crisis is ultra-capitalist
Peter Sutherland. After granting Francis an audience in June, Sutherland
dictated the Pope’s bogus “humanitarian” stance, subsequently adopted
by the capitalist rulers in Germany and other European nations as a
means to discredit Russian bosses. Sutherland is the chairman of Goldman
Sachs International and ex-chairman of British Petroleum. To protect
their billions in profits, both Goldman and BP need the U.S. war machine
to continue slaughtering workers in the Middle East."
[https://www.rte.ie/news/2018/0107/931558-peter-sutherland/]
RTE news reported:
"He served as chairman of Goldman Sachs for a
20-year period until 2015, and also served as the UN's special adviser
on migration until March of last year."
[https://www.rte.ie/news/2018/0107/931558-peter-sutherland/]
Did Francis's Former Lead Advisor on Refugees Sutherland's Goldman Sachs Create THE ILLEGAL US ALIEN INVASION?:
ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION INVASION: WHO CAUSED IT
http://kandylini.wordpress.com/2008/03/16/the-tequila-trap-the-real-story-behind-the-illegal-alien-invasion/
THE TEQUILA TRAP: THE REAL STORY BEHIND THE ILLEGAL ALIEN INVASION
Posted by kandylini on March 16, 2008
Here’s an excerpt from The Web of Debt. A nice refresher into what
happened in Mexico, and good to keep in mind when we want to blame
“them” for our economic problems when in fact they were manufactured by
our own government.
By 1994, Mexico had restored its standing with investors. It had a
balanced budget, a growth rate of over three percent, and a stock market
that was up fivefold. In February 1995, Jane Ingraham wrote in The New
American that Mexico’s fiscal policy was in some respects “superior and
saner than our own wildly spendthrift Washington circus.” Mexico
received enormous amounts of foreign investment, after being singled out
as the most promising and safest of Latin American markets. Investors
were therefore shocked and surprised when newly-elected President
Ernesto Zedillo suddenly announced a 13 percent devaluation of the peso,
since there seemed no valid reason for the move. The following day,
Zedillo allowed the formerly managed peso to float freely against the
dollar. The peso immediately plunged by 39 percent.5
What was going on? In 1994, the U.S. Congressional Budget Office Report
on NAFTA had diagnosed the peso as “overvalued” by 20 percent. The
Mexican government was advised to unpeg the currency and let it float,
allowing it to fall naturally to its “true” level. The theory was that
it would fall by only 20 percent; but that is not what happened. The
peso eventually dropped by 300 percent – 15 times the predicted fall.6
Its collapse was blamed on the lack of “investor confidence” due to
Mexico’s negative trade balance; but as Ingraham observes, investor
confidence was quite high immediately before the collapse. If a negative
trade balance is what sends a currency into massive devaluation and
hyperinflation, the U.S. dollar itself should have been driven there
long ago. By 2001, U.S. public and private debt totaled ten times the
debt of all Third World countries combined.7
Although the peso’s collapse was supposedly unanticipated, over 4
billion U.S. dollars suddenly and mysteriously left Mexico in the 20
days before it occurred. Six months later, this money had twice the
Mexican purchasing power it had earlier. Later commentators maintained
that lead investors with inside information precipitated the stampede
out of the peso.8 These investors were evidently the same parties who
profited from the Mexican bailout that followed. When Mexico’s banks ran
out of dollars to pay off its creditors (which were largely U.S.
banks), the U.S. government stepped in with U.S. tax dollars. The
Mexican bailout was engineered by Robert Rubin, who headed the
investment bank Goldman Sachs before he became U.S. Treasury Secretary.
Goldman Sachs was then heavily invested in short-term dollar-denominated
Mexican bonds. The bailout was arranged the very day of
Rubin’s appointment. Needless to say, the money provided by U.S.
taxpayers never made it to Mexico. It went straight into the
vaults of Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, and other big American lenders
whose risky loans were on the line.9
The late Jude Wanniski was a conservative economist who was at one time a
Wall Street Journal editor and adviser to President Reagan. He
cynically observed of this banker coup:
There was a big party at Morgan Stanley after the Mexican peso
devaluation, people from all over Wall Street came, they drank champagne
and smoked cigars and congratulated themselves on how they pulled it
off and they made a fortune. These people are pirates, international
pirates.10
The loot was more than just the profits of gamblers who had bet the
right way. The pirates actually got control of Mexico’s banks. NAFTA
rules had already opened the nationalized Mexican banking system to a
number of U.S. banks, with Mexican licenses being granted to 18 big
foreign banks and 16 brokers including Goldman Sachs. But these banks
could bring in no more than 20 percent of the system’s total capital,
limiting their market share in loans and securities holdings.11 They
wanted the whole enchilada. By 2004, all but one of Mexico’s major banks
had been sold to foreign banks, which gained total access to the
formerly closed Mexican banking market.12
The value of Mexican pesos and Mexican stocks collapsed together,
supposedly because there was a stampede to sell and no one around to
buy; but buyers with ample funds were sitting on the sidelines, waiting
to pick over the devalued stock at bargain basement prices. The result
was a direct transfer of wealth from the local economy to international
money manipulators.
Francis Notes:
- Doctor
of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt
the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church
in such a situation:
"[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him, or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See."
(The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)
Saint Robert Bellarmine, also, said "the Pope heretic is not deposed ipso facto, but must be declared deposed by the Church."
[https://archive.org/stream/SilveiraImplicationsOfNewMissaeAndHereticPopes/Silveira%20Implications%20of%20New%20Missae%20and%20Heretic%20Popes_djvu.txt]
- "If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?": http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2020/12/if-francis-is-heretic-what-should.html
- "Could Francis be a Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?": http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2019/03/could-francis-be-antipope-even-though.html
- LifeSiteNews, "Confusion explodes as Pope Francis throws magisterial
weight behind communion for adulterers," December 4, 2017:
The AAS guidelines explicitly allows "sexually active adulterous couples
facing 'complex circumstances' to 'access the sacraments of
Reconciliation and the Eucharist.'"
- On February 2018, in Rorate Caeli, Catholic theologian Dr. John Lamont:
"The AAS statement... establishes that Pope Francis in Amoris Laetitia
has affirmed propositions that are heretical in the strict sense."
- On December 2, 2017, Bishop Rene Gracida:
"Francis' heterodoxy is now official. He has published his letter to the
Argentina bishops in Acta Apostlica Series making those letters
magisterial documents."
Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church by the bishops by the grace of God.
Election Notes:
- Intel Cryptanalyst-Mathematician on Biden Steal: "212Million Registered Voters & 66.2% Voting,140.344 M Voted...Trump got 74 M, that leaves only 66.344 M for Biden" [http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/intel-cryptanalyst-mathematician-on.html?m=1]
- Will US be Venezuela?: Ex-CIA Official told Epoch Times "Chávez started to Focus on [Smartmatic] Voting Machines to Ensure Victory as early as 2003": http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/will-us-be-venezuela-ex-cia-official.html
http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/01/a-hour-which-will-live-in-infamy-1001pm.html?m=1
http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/epoch-times-show-crossroads-on-capital.html?m=1]