In 2003, Joe Sobran, who was a Patrick Buchanan conservative, wrote one of the great articles on Rush Limbaugh after it was found out that he had "been illegally buying prescription painkillers and publicly confessed his addiction." It is a marvelous work of writing because it showed the greatness of Rush despite his failings and revealed the hypocrisy of the liberal media by showing its supposed most prized "virtues":
Revenge of the Liberal Media
“Limbaugh’s long-running act
as a paragon of virtue is over,” crows Evan Thomas in
Newsweek. The magazine devotes its October 20 cover story
to a snide portrait of the talk-radio superstar, who has been illegally
buying prescription painkillers and publicly confessed his addiction.
Its columnist
Jonathan Alter also chimes in, predicting that Limbaugh will receive
“the compassion he routinely denies to other people” and
hoping he’ll now offer “a more tolerant and less vitriolic
message.”
Say what you will,
over the past decade or so Rush Limbaugh has had a truly remarkable
impact on American public life. He has totally shattered the old liberal
media monopoly. Even conservatives (like me) who now find him
disappointing are judging him by standards he himself has done so much to
change. He has come to seem routine, almost conventional; but not so long
ago liberals were portraying him as sinister, dangerous, possibly
fascistic.
Since Limbaugh is
far too familiar and genial to paint the swastika on, Thomas and his team
of crack investigative reporters are now showing him as a shy,
overweight, pathetic loser, and near-recluse, from high school onward. We
learn that he never finished college, and is “a childless,
twice-divorced, thrice-married schlub.” We are even told that (unnamed)
women who have dated him complained that he “talked about
himself and didn’t seem interested in them at all,” the brute!
No stone is left
unturned, or unthrown: “He was not much of a success as a disc
jockey, either.” His father urged him to become a lawyer and tried
to dissuade him from pursuing a career in radio...
... As John
O’Sullivan has put it, “The defense of virtue must not be left
to the virtuous.” There aren’t enough of them. Some of the
best people in the world are inarticulate, and they need the support of
those who, though imperfect, have the polemical skills to make the case
for God’s law in the public forum...
I have my own
reservations about Limbaugh, but I could never wish this on him: an ugly
dose of liberal tolerance. I think his jocose boasting is tiresome, but after
all, it’s a joke. He has never posed as “a paragon of
virtue.” He argues for more-or-less conservative public standards
without pretending to exemplify them...
... I love the story
related by the French writer-statesman Andre Malraux. Malraux once asked
an old priest what he’d learned about human nature from listening
to thousands of people’s darkest secrets in the confessional.
The priest was
naturally reluctant to answer. Malraux stressed that he wasn’t
asking him to violate the seal of the confessional, merely seeking
generalizations. Finally, the priest said he’d learned two basic
things. First, people are more unhappy than they seem. Second, nobody ever
really grows up.
To me that’s a
priceless observation. This is a world of children trying to act like adults.
Now and then we get a glimpse of the real child behind the grownup
façade. You can take a malicious glee in what you see; or you can say,
“There but for the grace of God go I.” Liberals are now
gloating like little brats at Limbaugh’s discomfort.
Limbaugh is actually
proving he’s the opposite of a hypocrite. He’s following his
own advice, which is to take your medicine without blaming others for
your fate. He doesn’t deny people compassion; he just refuses to
equate compassion with government programs. The liberals’ great
hypocrisy is to claim a monopoly of compassion for referring all social
problems to the state. Talk about posing as paragons of virtue!
So part of
Limbaugh’s punishment is an ordeal by slander. It’s not even
as if he were smoking pot or taking “recreational” drugs. Like
many other people, he got addicted to painkillers after surgery. How much
he is to blame for this, only God knows; but Newsweek is
ready, willing, and eager to assume the worst. Liberal tolerance! Liberal
compassion! Take a good look...
... I almost hate to say
it at just this moment, but Limbaugh’s brand of conservatism
strikes me as essentially timid. He plays it safe and stays well within the
neoconservative guidelines for “respectable” conservatives.
He’s more a Republican apologist than a principled conservative.
But, unlike his enemies (and even some of his allies), he’s too
decent to attack the weak. His foes rarely attack anyone else.
Newsweek inadvertently makes Limbaugh a
sympathetic figure. It wasn’t able to dredge up anything shocking.
Instead, it found a rather sad, shy loner, discouraged by his own father,
who dreamed of success in radio and was resilient enough to achieve it.
Straining, however,
to put the pretty tame facts in the worst light, the magazine only
underlines the magnitude of Limbaugh’s achievement and its own
irrational hatred of anyone who looks like a conservative.
[http://www.sobran.com/wanderer/w2003/w031023.shtml]
Francis Notes:
- Doctor
of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt
the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church
in such a situation:
"[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him, or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See."
(The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)
Saint Robert Bellarmine, also, said "the Pope heretic is not deposed ipso facto, but must be declared deposed by the Church."
[https://archive.org/stream/SilveiraImplicationsOfNewMissaeAndHereticPopes/Silveira%20Implications%20of%20New%20Missae%20and%20Heretic%20Popes_djvu.txt]
- "If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?": http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2020/12/if-francis-is-heretic-what-should.html
- "Could Francis be a Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?": http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2019/03/could-francis-be-antipope-even-though.html
- LifeSiteNews, "Confusion explodes as Pope Francis throws magisterial
weight behind communion for adulterers," December 4, 2017:
The AAS guidelines explicitly allows "sexually active adulterous couples
facing 'complex circumstances' to 'access the sacraments of
Reconciliation and the Eucharist.'"
- On February 2018, in Rorate Caeli, Catholic theologian Dr. John Lamont:
"The AAS statement... establishes that Pope Francis in Amoris Laetitia
has affirmed propositions that are heretical in the strict sense."
- On December 2, 2017, Bishop Rene Gracida:
"Francis' heterodoxy is now official. He has published his letter to the
Argentina bishops in Acta Apostlica Series making those letters
magisterial documents."
Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church by the bishops by the grace of God.
Election Notes:
- Intel Cryptanalyst-Mathematician on Biden Steal: "212Million Registered Voters & 66.2% Voting,140.344 M Voted...Trump got 74 M, that leaves only 66.344 M for Biden" [http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/intel-cryptanalyst-mathematician-on.html?m=1]
- Will US be Venezuela?: Ex-CIA Official told Epoch Times "Chávez started to Focus on [Smartmatic] Voting Machines to Ensure Victory as early as 2003": http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/will-us-be-venezuela-ex-cia-official.html
http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/01/a-hour-which-will-live-in-infamy-1001pm.html?m=1