Skip to main content

Houston War Zone: Why didn't the Flu Outbreak Hospital War Zones of 2018 require the Destruction of the United States Economy and the Banning of the Catholic Mass?

The Bear asked a question:


The Bear said… 
Ghat explains Bear’s confusion over “COVID Cases” and “confirmed cases.” Because it seems that a positive test result would be a “case,” so what’s the difference between a “case” and a “confirmed case.” The Bear figured the difference was between a positive test result and some made-up BS. Thanks for sorting this out.

Now all you have to do is explain the Houston version of Covid Cases Overwhelm Hospital ICUs story. 
I'll answer with a question: 
Why didn't the flu outbreak hospital war zones of 2018 require the destruction of the United States economy and the banning of the Catholic Mass?
 
I received a email from my traditional Latin Mass pastor which summarizes the information many people are getting:

"[M]ost people who get the coronavirus are not likely to become gravely ill, [but] COVID-19 is highly contagious."

Even former Barack Obama Global AIDS Coordinator Dr. Deborah Birx who is the present White House Coronavirus Coordinator said most don't die unless they're old and already sickly:

"99% of all mortality coming out of Europe in general is over 50 and [people who have] pre-existing conditions."
(The Jewish Voice, "Trump: 'USA not Built to be Shut Down" - Latest Presser from White House, March 23, 2020)

The media claims that the Coronavirus is "highly contagious" (which most people such as my pastor apparently believe) are not verified by science.

Live Science says how contagious a illness is measured by RO which means "the average number of people who catch a virus":

"The flu has a RO of 1.3... Preliminary studies have estimated a RO value for the new coronavirus to be between 2 and 3."
(Live Science, "How does the new coronavirus compare with the flu," 5 days ago)

Approximately double the rate of the flu. In simple words:

The scientific evidence above is not claiming that the Coronavirus is the end of the world which requires that the United States economy be destroyed and the Catholic Mass be banned.

Moreover, epidemiological expert Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg has brought forward credible scientific evidence that the PCR test used to verify Coronavirus could be flawed and even possibly dubious in results which basically could falsely be claiming a virus is Coronavirus when it's another virus.
(Modern Ghana, "The curse of the PCR method- comments on the COVID-19 criticism by Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, MD,"M 23, 2020)

Are the Coronavirus PCR tests quickly accepted by the apparent Communist Chinese operative World Health Organization (WHO) for supposed urgency giving not only possibly false positives, but wrongly identifying flu-like symptoms as COVID-19?

Finally, is the anecdotal evidence of Italian hospitals looking like war zones a straw man fallacy when we an look back to images of the 2018 flue outbreak with very similar images of hospital war zones.
(Daily Mail, "Flu drives hospitals into "war zone" conditions: Tents on the streets in California, 'state of emergency' in Alabama, and Boston is using Gatorade to plug shortage of IV drips," January 17,2018)

Why didn't the flu outbreak hospital war zones of 2018 require the destruction of the United States economy and the banning of the Catholic Mass?

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Mass and of the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Also, pray an Our Father now for President Trump to get the grace of God to do God's will in this crisis.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...