Skip to main content

The Coronavirus Ecumenical Creed for Virus Trads and Virus Liberals

"I believe in Coronavirus almighty. The creator of lockdown on earth which was conceived of the unholy fear of it and borne of the fear of it. It suffered under a bunch of lies about it. It stupefied and was gloried. It descended into the earth. It ascended into the presidential thrones where they shall judge the banning of Masses and the Coronavirus dead.

"I believe in Amoris Laetitia, the communion of adulterers, Francis's representation of the globalist teachings which is embodied in the climate change gospel, a one-world government and the goddess mother earth everlasting."

I wrote this ecumenical creed with the hope it will help the Francis traditionalists and the Francis liberals to unite in their common belief in the Coronavirus almighty.

While it is well know that virus traditionalists like Steve Skojec, Tim Gordon and all the virus trads feel uncomfortable with the part of the creed about the climate change gospel and the communion of adulterers, they must endure this temporary discomfort.

They must remember that they agree with the Francis liberals in the part of the creed about the Coronavirus almighty, the banning of Masses and that anyone who dies even if they didn't have the virus can be added to the sacred virus death toll so that it can keep the unholy fear of it going everlasting.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Mass and the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of the Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Comments

Stephen Lowe said…
outstanding...
3:03 AM
Alexis Bugnolo said…
This is the blog post equivalent of a cream pie in the face...
12:40 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more