Skip to main content

Why has 1P5 Skojec been in the Chinese Coronavirus Panic Craze since February 9th?

One Peter Five's publisher Steve Skojec was one of the first to campaign for conspiracy believing Alex Jones' protege Paul Joseph Watson's Coronavirus world panic narrative.

Jones reportedly believes in outer space aliens.
(Funny or Die, "Scream these Alex Jones quotes to get out of any Situation," March 26, 2017)

Coincidentally, another Coronavirus world panic narrative promoter so-called conservative Michael Savage is a frequent guest in InfoWars.

The San Francisco Press Club reported:

"KNEW's Michael Savage, who once wrote a book titled 'Liberalism is a Mental Disorder,' has donated $5,600 to the campaign of one California's best known liberals, Jerry Brown."
(San Francisco Press Club, "Radio's Michael Savage backs Jerry Brown," October 15, 2006)

But, getting back to Watson, who is a contributor to Jones' InfoWars, in early February he posted a Coronavirus scare video supposedly from China that to this writer appeared to possibly be staged which Skojec posted on Twitter.

Along with the February 9 post, the One Peter Five publisher wrote:

"Can anyone with knowledge of China help explain what these people are so afraid of? If this is just a quarantine, this wouldn't be happening."

Might the anti-Rush Limbaugh Savage have some answers to that question?

Maybe Alex Jones can answer Skojec's question on the InfoWars' Watson's February Coronavirus scare video?

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Mass and the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Also, pray an Our Father now for God to give President Trump to grace to do his will in the present crisis.








Comments

Aqua said…
This comment has been removed by the author.

Popular posts from this blog

Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Francis teaches HERESY," now, the question is will he do a Skojec & a Schneider Cop Out

    Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation: "[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic , he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him , or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See." (The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306) Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Pope Francis teaches HERESY: Pope Pius XII condemned the heresy of Francis": Pope Francis on Feb 2 2022, taught, "that in Christ no one can ever truly separate us from those we love because the bond is an existential bond, a strong bond that is in our very nature...who have denied the faith, who are apostates." Pope Pius XII taught the exact opposite when he wrote of those: "who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or b

Wernz-Vidal: "One cannot consider as Schismatics those who Refuse to Obey the Roman Pontiff because they would hold his person Suspect or, because of Widespread Rumors, Doubtfully Elected"

    Pope Francis is tottering on the precipice of Hell. None of this means he isn't the pope, and such talk among the laity is scandalous in its own right. Not a single cardinal in that 2013 conclave has come out and said the election was rigged and Bergoglio isn't the pope, that he is in fact an anti-pope . If he is, a future pope can declare that, when Jorge Bergoglio will no longer be a pope. But if the very men gathered in conclave haven't made that public accusation,  anyone who is suggesting that better take into account that they too will have to give an account of themselves to Almighty God when they die . Such talk adds to the scandal of the "little ones," the simple, even potential converts, who, when they hear big-mouth Catholics on social media saying he's not really the pope, draw back from approaching the Church. Do any of us desire to stand in front Our Blessed Lord as the Supreme Judge and explain why, in our desire for more c

The Nuremberg Trial-like Excuse which Cardinal Burke has so Staggeringly, so Stereotypically Proffered on the Promised “Formal Correction”

Does Cardinal Burke think Francis is an antipope? On at least five occasions, Cardinal Burke has rejected the magisterial nature of official papal teaching (in one case, pre-emptively dismissing a hypothetical official teaching of the Magisterium): Cardinal Burke has rejected the official teaching of Pope Francis in the new Apostolic Constitution Episcopalis Communio concerning the possibility that a pope can raise the final synodal document to the level of ordinary magisterium, if the pope chooses. (We covered the Episcopalis Communio here .) The whole apostolic constitution on the Synod is problematic. … This idea that either the Pope on his own or the Synod together with the Pope can create some new Magisterium [i.e. a new teaching of the ordinary Magisterium], is simply false. The Synod is a consultative body, to help the Pope to see how best to present the Church’s teaching in time. It’s not able to create ordinary Magisterium. As a canon lawyer, Cardinal Burk