Skip to main content

Is "Airborne" Coronavirus Fact or Fiction & is the Media's Scaremongering Spreading it?

One study appears to be all that supports the Coronavirus "airborne" statements made by the media. That study apparently hasn't been peer reviewed.

The medical website MDLinx said:

"Their findings are based on a study... expected to be published soon."

If the study hasn't been peer reviewed than its validity is still questionable because without other experts in the same field evaluating it for its correctness it is still uncertain, debatable and possibly dubious.

The study said Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) and SARS (SARS-CoV-1) "behave similarly... the results failed to explain why COVID-19 has become a much larger outbreak" [yet in my opinion, the similar behaving 2002-2004 SARS didn't entail the semi-destruction of the United States economy and specifically the apparent California attempt to destroy small businesses and only injure large China tied corporate businesses].
(MDLinx, "Fact or fiction: Is COVID-19 really airborne" March 18, 2020)

According to Wikipedia and the link they provided "fatigue" and the "psychological effects on the workers in response to the stress" was a "key reason"  in the the SARC "development."
(Wikipedia, "2002-2004 SARS outbreak among healthcare workers")

Could the relentless "stress" and "fatigue" caused by the scaremongering media be causing the farther spread of the Coronavirus?

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Mass and the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate of Mary.

Also, pray an Our Father now for God to give President Trump to do His will in this crisis.

Comments

Alexis Bugnolo said…
I have seen reports that there is no evidence of air borne transmission, as no virus has been found in airborne particles. Also a recent cruise ship which was infected, had only 19% catch the disease and out of 3700 passengers only 7 died of it.

Popular posts from this blog

5 Dubia Questions for 1P5's Steve Skojec & All faithful Catholics especially Francis is definitely Pope Cardinals, Bishops & pundits

Here are five really short and easy to answer dubia questions which hopefully aren't too complicated for Steve Skojec, publisher of the One Peter Five website, to answer. To make it really easy for the publisher of One Peter Five it has been formatted so that he only has to answer: yes or no. 1. Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales said "The Pope... when he is explicitly a heretic... the Church must either deprive him or as some say declare him deprived of his Apostolic See." Was St. Francis de Sales a Sedevacantist or a Benevacantist? Answer: yes or no. 2. "Universal Acceptance" theologian John of St. Thomas said "This man in particular lawfully elected and accepted by the Church is the supreme pontiff." Was John of St. Thomas for saying "the supreme pontiff" must be BOTH "lawfully elected and accepted by the Church" a Sedevacantist or a Benevacantist? Answer: yes or no. 3. Do you think that a "supreme pontiff...

non veni pacem (Mark Docherty) Prevost appoints Cupich to join McCarrick roomie Farrell at the Pontifical Commission for the Vatican City State

non veni pacem (Mark Docherty) Prevost appoints Cupich to join McCarrick roomie Farrell at the Pontifical Commission for the Vatican City State Pray an Our Father now for reparation for the sins committed because of Francis’s Amoris Laetitia and  for the restoration of the Church. Stop for a moment of silence, ask Jesus Christ what He wants you to do now and next. In this silence remember God, Father, Son and Holy Ghost – Three Divine Persons yet One God, has an ordered universe where you can know truth and falsehood as well as never forget that He wants you to have eternal happiness with Him as his son or daughter by grace. Make this a practice. By doing this you are doing more good than reading anything here or anywhere else on the Internet. Conclave Notes: Has the Trad Media fallen into a COVID-like mass formation with Leo XVI? While it's humorous to see the former anti-Francis Trad pundits suddenly acting like teen age girls infatuated with Leo, it could lead to a Trojan Horse ...

LifeSite: "Prevost’s reported support...allowing divorced & civilly 'remarried'...to receive Holy Communion": “Whoever…helps...promulgation of heresy…is suspected of heresy.” --Canon 2316, Code of Canon Law (1917-1982)

“Whoever…willingly and knowingly helps in the promulgation of heresy…is suspected of heresy.” --Canon 2316,  Code of Canon Law (1917-1982) Trump congratulates Pope Leo XIV on being named first American pontiff ... .. .  While Prevost’s election to the papacy is sure to gladden a number of Americans, and  the cardinal has been  seen  as a “compromise candidate” for the papacy by the College of Cardinals, his history indicates that he may continue the heterodox positions of Pope Francis.  This includes, significantly, Prevost’s  reported  support of the practice of  allowing divorced and civilly “remarried” Catholics to receive Holy Communion without repentance. [ https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/trump-congratulates-pope-leo-xiv-on-being-named-first-american-pontiff/?utm_source=featured-news&utm_campaign=catholic] Pray an Our Father now for reparation for the sins committed because of Francis’s Amoris Laetitia. Pray an Our Father now for ...