Skip to main content

The Catholic Resistance vs. the Sedevacantist Movement & 1P5 Francis Trad Skojec who Agrees with the Sedevacantists that Pope Benedict & Francis are the Same

Italian canon law expert Br. Alexis Bugnolo recently wrote that one of the enemies of the Catholic Resistance is the "Sedevacantist Movement," but they are admitting that the Resistance is getting closer to "victory":

"There is no news more pleasant to hear, than that one’s rivals, having surveyed the battle fields in advance, announce that victory will be yours."

"It came on Facebook, from Novus Ordo Watch, the veritable Flagship of the Sedevacantist Movement:
 

"NovusOrdoWatch


14 hrs · 'It looks like this is the year the 'Benedict XVI is the real Pope' deception will find mainstream acceptance: It lets people rid themselves of Bergoglio without having to embrace the dreaded and hated Sedevacantism. The facts about Ratzinger [Pope Benedict] will be ignored — too inconvenient!'"
 

"What is a Sedevacantist?


Sedevacantists hold in general that there have been no true popes since Pius XII. They accept the error of Luther that there is no authority or unity in the Church except that which is given the individual by the virtue of Faith. Thus, holding themselves as purer than all others, after the manner of Jansenists, they judge nearly everyone a heretic and thus outside of the Church. Their special target is all who hold an office which comes down through Apostolic Succession, because that is the real threat to their error and their egos."
 
"So when these guys say you are winning, its a great day indeed! Amen. Praise God."
 
"In the end the truth wins out!"
[https://fromrome.info/2020/01/19/flagship-of-sedes-presages-ppbxvi-movement-victory-in-2020/]

Another enemy of the Catholic Resistance is Francis traditionalist One Peter Five publisher Steve Skojec who agrees with the Sedevacantists that Pope Benedict XVI and Francis are the same.

On Twitter he said in answer to the question "You think he [Pope Benedict] agreed with ANYTHING Francis has done?" Skojec said, like the Sedevacantists, "Everything":


Laurence England Dec 7
Replying to @SteveSkojec @dhgyapong and 2 others
You think he agreed with ANYTHING Francis has done?
                                                                                             
         

View conversation · Reply Retweet Like
Steve Skojec Dec 7
Replying to @TheCrushedBones @dhgyapong and 2 others
Everything.                

 
Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus Christ and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

 
 

Comments

Alexis Bugnolo said…
A lot of information here from an Argentine about Bergoglio
https://ordomilitarisradio.wordpress.com/2020/01/28/a-major-reply-from-an-argentine-catholic-to-cardinal-bassetti/
7:40 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more