Skip to main content

Might Great Schism Cardinal's Lying to St. Vincent shed light on why Cdl. Burke appears to be running away from a Canon law Expert & apparently is Lying?

Canon law expert Br. Alexis Bugnolo gives a brief summary of why Saint Vincent Ferrer was wrong on who was the real pope during the Great Western Schism. It appears that this history may shed light on our present crisis on why Cardinal Raymond Burke appears to be running away from Br. Bugnolo and apparently is lying:





Comments

Aaron said…
Mr. Martinez,

As with Abbe de Nantes who accused P.Paul VI and P. John Paul II of heresy and did not receive a reply, so it was with St. Vincent. Interestingly, if, as Fr. Villa suggests, P. Francis is not pope and Benedict, emeritus, is pope, P. Francis can be examined and judged heretical (or not) by any competent Church authority. Else, as demonstrated by Abbe de Nantes, the only one who can judge P. Francis is...P. Francis.
Fred Martinez said…
Make a choice:

Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales vs. the non-Doctor of the Church, non-saint and even within traditionalist circles considered a bit controversial by some Abbe de Nantes.

Easy choice.
Aaron said…
Mr Martinez,

While that may be so, the decision might also be framed as: choose 38 years delay as a result of human respect or respond to the heresies as they develop and appear: St. Vincent, the former (human respect and trust in Cardinal Pedro, a flaw adamantly decried by St. John Bosco) or Abbe de Nantes, the latter(considered, as indicated, controversial).

Nearly 60 years on from the Second Vatican Council, how much more must be lost because of those whose primary duty does not clearly seem to be the salvation of souls?

The choice, in charity, is to deny human respect: deny the so-called Cult of Man.
Debbie said…
For what it's worth: I met his Eminence Cardinal Burke this past October at the Call to Holiness Conference here in Michigan. I presented him with a copy of the book 'The Shepherd and the Rock" by J. Michael Miller, C.S.B. When I handed it to him he said he already had this in his library. I asked him to please take it any way because I'd written a note on the inside cover. He smiled and took it. I'd never met a bishop or cardinal before and was nervous. All I could think to say was, please help us, he's not the Pope.
Alexis Bugnolo said…
Aron,

If you believe someone is a heretic, you can ask him in private or write a letter. But when he does not respond, you must follow Jesus' rule and approach him with others as witnesses and if he still wont reply, you denounce him to Church authorities. Did the Abbe do that? or was his letter a publicity stunt?
Aaron said…
Br. Alexis Bugnolo,

With great esteem for your thought and work, I thank you for your reply.

From what I can glean, Abbe de Nantes was at first inclined to hope in P.Paul VI, particularly upon hearing his discourse on the Virgin Mary and Corpus Christi May 1964. That all evaporated with the publication of Ecclesiam Suam in August that year.

What, then, did Jesus say to do in the event that the person, believed to be a heretic, is not only "a" Church authority, but is "the" Church authority? Apostolic tradition suggests one such solution in Galatians 2 and this action is echoed by The Remnant, the Dubia Cardinals et cetera. Perhaps Abbe de Nantes has simply provided philosophical and theological justification for requiring the Successor of Peter to judge himself, that he might not be in error?

Nevertheless, this poses an even graver quandary, particularly today: suppose the current Bishop of Rome is accused of heresy and, following Abbe de Nantes, he invokes papal infallibility to render judgement(of which he may or may not possess...A. Barnhardt et al.):
a) He is pope and any heresy is pronounced and/or renounced
b) He is not pope, further cementing the Conciliar experiment

Eschatologically speaking, while there are precursors to the anti-Christ, there also exist precursors to the Second Coming of Christ, of which, I believe, are to be seen Henoch-type and Elijah-type men. Like Father Luigi Villa. Like Abbe de Nantes. And, yes, like you Brother Alexis.

So, no, I don't think his letters, books and other publications were a publicity stunt.

Popular posts from this blog

Flashback: The Truth: "It's Not Just Fraud; It's Treason" by the Propaganda Media, the Democrats and those Complicit in the Fraud

November 30, 2020  NewsMax TV host Greg Kelly explained best what the massive 2020 presidential voter fraud and lying as well as gaslighting of the " Media, Judges, 'Experts' all 'Nothing to See Here, Folks, Move along'" means to you, your family and the United States: Greg Kelly @gregkellyusa The SYSTEM trying to RAILROAD @realDonaldTrump OUT OF OFFICE. The Media, Judges, “Experts” all “Nothing to See Here, Folks, Move along” —They have NO respect for US. IF they can pull this FRAUD with a President, think of what they can do to YOU. NOT OVER. NO WAY. [https://twitter.com/gregkellyusa/status/1333044311978618881 and https://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/11/gateway-pundit-videos-first-time-in.html] -Catholic Monitor "H older of 4 degrees from MIT Ph.D. Dr. Shiva Ayvadurai, the inventor of the email, at the Arizona state voter fraud public hearing " presented his data at the Arizona hearing, showing the only way for Joe Biden to hav...

Fr. Chad Ripperger's Breastplate of St. Patrick (Modified) & Binding Prayer ("In the Name of Jesus Christ, our Lord and God, and by the power of the Most Holy Catholic Church of Jesus, I render all spirits impotent...")

    Deliverance Prayers II  The Minor Exorcisms and Deliverance Prayers compiled by Fr Chad Ripperger: Breastplate of St. Patrick (Modified) I bind (myself, or N.) today to a strong virtue, an invocation of the Trinity. I believe in a Threeness, with a confession of an Oneness in the Creator of the Universe. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of Christ’s birth with his baptism, to the virtue of his crucifixion with his burial, to the virtue of his resurrection with his ascension, to the virtue of his coming to the Judgment of Doom. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of ranks of Cherubim, in obedience of Angels, in service of Archangels, in hope of resurrection for reward, in prayers of Patriarchs, in preaching of Apostles, in faiths of confessors, in innocence of Holy Virgins, in deeds of righteous men. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of Heaven, in light of Sun, in brightness of Snow, in splendor of Fire, in speed of l...

Was Bergoglio Chosen?: CIA Pope - "The Real Mover and Shaker of this Entire Spectacle is the Deep State"

U.S. Deep State Pope And Its Implications For You By Laramie Hirsch The U.S. State Department routinely pressures members of the United Security Council with a view to influencing the vote pertaining to Security Council resolutions. U.S. covert operations and propaganda campaigns are routinely applied with a view to influencing national elections in different countries around the world. Similarly, the CIA has a longstanding covert relationship with the Vatican. Did the U.S. government attempt to influence the outcome of the election of the new pontiff? Firmly committed to serving U.S. foreign policy interests in Latin America, Jorge Mario Bergoglio was Washington’s preferred candidate. Were undercover pressures discretely exerted by Washington, within the Catholic Church, directly or indirectly, on the 115 cardinals who are members of the Vatican conclave? Professor Michel Chossudovsky,  “Washington’s Pope”? Who is Pope Francis I? Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio and Argentina’s “Dir...