Skip to main content

IP5 Skojec's Top Lap Dog JohnnyCuredents & "Reality itself seems to be doing a Number on your Blood Pressure"

On January 4, in the Church Militant comment section for this post "POPE: ‘NO COMPROMISE WITH EUTHANASIA EVEN IN TERMINAL ILLNESS’" it appears that one of One Peter Five's Steve Skojec's top commenters and lap dogs attacked commenter Helen with the following propaganda name calling.

This is from her text messages to me because I am not a premium subscriber of the website and can't access the post:

"JohnnyCuredents   Helen

Why didn't you say up front that you were a sedevacantist? I wouldn't have bothered explaining anything in that case because I think in that direction lies madness. Sorry, but I have no patience for this brand of idiotic tommyrot; you've set yourself up as popessa, but I'm Catholic. Oh, and don't waste your own time responding since I'll never read it. I BLOCK all sedes to keep my blood pressure in range.  (Comment to me, from JohnnyC, about two weeks ago, at Church Militant)"

"Helen  JohnnyCuredents

14 days ago"

"It is an unconscionable slander to call anyone who recognizes the existence of doubts concerning Bergoglian validity--as Cardinal Burke does--a sedevavantist. Interesting, though, that you use this dodge to avoid engaging, at an intellectual level, with anything else I have said. Reality itself seems to be doing a number on your blood pressure"

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary. 

Comments

Debbie said…
"A time is coming when people will go mad, and they see someone who is not mad, they will mock him saying: 'you are mad, you are not like us'".

Unite the clans? I don't think so. Sad.
Aqua said…
The writers over at 1P5 have a serious Cognitive Dissonance problem. And that usually leads to an unsettled psyche, a disturbed conscience perhaps. Anger is usually the byproduct.

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...