Skip to main content

Francis Trad Skojec & his Lap Dog vs. Real Canon Law Expert

- Updated January 23, 2020

On January 18, in the Church Militant comment section for the post "Interview With Antonio Socci: ‘We Are Watching the Leaders of the Church Work Against Her’" it appears that one of One Peter Five Steve Skojec's top commenters and lap dogs  attacked "Ann Barnhardt, Fred Martinez, and Rene Gracida."

I want to say right now that I am honored to be attacked and listed in the same sentence as Bishop Rene Gracida whom I consider to be the St. Athanasius of the Francis Crisis.

I am, also, honored to be attacked in the same sentence as Miss Barnhardt. In my opinion, she is one of the great Catholic bloggers of our time and has more talent and courage in her pinky than Skojec and

Skojec's top commenter fans. Skojec appears to be his hero. Its humourous to read.































17 Refute LifeSiteNews' Theologian: "Benedict [must have]... thought: I only want to resign the Ministerium if it is in fact distinct from the Munus"?














Finally, we come, again, to Br. Bugnolo who has explained in overwhelming detail in the following treatise using canon law why canonists are wrong in saying ministerium and munus are synonyms that mean the exact same thing or nearly the exact same thing:
































Note: I deleted a sentence that was, I believe, possibly over the top on JohnnyCuredents' apparent over appreciation of Skojec's scholarly arguments. I think both agree with the Catholic Monitor that Francis is deeply problematic and it is hoped that they will resort to honest agruments against those who present evidence against Francis's papal validity instead of propagandistic name calling.





Comments

Aqua said…
"That means that the Petrine Succession has not yet occurred. The train left the station with all the Cardinals and hoopla, but Benedict and his papal office are still on the platform."

That little paragraph is pure gold.

Jesus spoke in parables for a reason. This is not a parable, but, like a parable it draws a nice picture for the simpleminded like me to understand. And also it made me laugh. Because it is true and it is a farce.
Charmaine said…
I had given a downvote to Skojec's alter ego "JohnnyCuredents" first comment before I knew you blogged about this. Heck, maybe they're the same person.

Popular posts from this blog

Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Francis teaches HERESY," now, the question is will he do a Skojec & a Schneider Cop Out

    Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation: "[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic , he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him , or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See." (The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306) Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Pope Francis teaches HERESY: Pope Pius XII condemned the heresy of Francis": Pope Francis on Feb 2 2022, taught, "that in Christ no one can ever truly separate us from those we love because the bond is an existential bond, a strong bond that is in our very nature...who have denied the faith, who are apostates." Pope Pius XII taught the exact opposite when he wrote of those: "who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or b

Wernz-Vidal: "One cannot consider as Schismatics those who Refuse to Obey the Roman Pontiff because they would hold his person Suspect or, because of Widespread Rumors, Doubtfully Elected"

    Pope Francis is tottering on the precipice of Hell. None of this means he isn't the pope, and such talk among the laity is scandalous in its own right. Not a single cardinal in that 2013 conclave has come out and said the election was rigged and Bergoglio isn't the pope, that he is in fact an anti-pope . If he is, a future pope can declare that, when Jorge Bergoglio will no longer be a pope. But if the very men gathered in conclave haven't made that public accusation,  anyone who is suggesting that better take into account that they too will have to give an account of themselves to Almighty God when they die . Such talk adds to the scandal of the "little ones," the simple, even potential converts, who, when they hear big-mouth Catholics on social media saying he's not really the pope, draw back from approaching the Church. Do any of us desire to stand in front Our Blessed Lord as the Supreme Judge and explain why, in our desire for more c

The Nuremberg Trial-like Excuse which Cardinal Burke has so Staggeringly, so Stereotypically Proffered on the Promised “Formal Correction”

Does Cardinal Burke think Francis is an antipope? On at least five occasions, Cardinal Burke has rejected the magisterial nature of official papal teaching (in one case, pre-emptively dismissing a hypothetical official teaching of the Magisterium): Cardinal Burke has rejected the official teaching of Pope Francis in the new Apostolic Constitution Episcopalis Communio concerning the possibility that a pope can raise the final synodal document to the level of ordinary magisterium, if the pope chooses. (We covered the Episcopalis Communio here .) The whole apostolic constitution on the Synod is problematic. … This idea that either the Pope on his own or the Synod together with the Pope can create some new Magisterium [i.e. a new teaching of the ordinary Magisterium], is simply false. The Synod is a consultative body, to help the Pope to see how best to present the Church’s teaching in time. It’s not able to create ordinary Magisterium. As a canon lawyer, Cardinal Burk