Skip to main content

Might Ganswein have Covered-up for the "Financial... [Vatican] Corruption" Revealed by Vigano that "Pushed" Pope Benedict to Resign?

On February 15, 2013, the Daily Mail in the article "Was the Pope pushed? An abuse scandal, corruption and the dark intrigue behind Benedict's shock resignation" reported:

"[P]apal aides are promoted to archbishop when an ailing Pope wishes to create an unofficial 'gatekeeper'. But if Benedict knew he was about to quit, why appoint Ganswein to the position?"

"The Pope's departure also comes at a time of scrutiny over the Vatican's alleged links to the world of organised crime."

Is it possible that Ganswein was installed by the machinations of Vatican operatives of those who were "alleged[ly] link[ed] to the world of organised crime" to be a "gatekeeper" and cover-up corrupt financial matters as well as to "push" him psychologically to resign?

Moreover, in January 2013, Inside the Vatican revealed in the piece "The Pope's Trust in Monsignor Ganswein":

"It is said in Rome that Ganswein, in staunchly protecting the time and energy of the Pope... may have prevented the Pope from being informed about certain important matters, especially financial... like the cases of corruption alleged by Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano."

Might Ganswein have covered-up for the "financial... [Vatican] corruption" revealed by Vigano that "pushed" Pope Benedict to resign?

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Comments

Alexis Bugnolo said…
I know from a source at Rome, that Gotti, who worked at the Vatican but was dismissed by those involved in covering up corruption in financial matters, was told by Cardinal Bertone on Feb. 7, 2013 in an hour long meeting:

1) Benedict never knew about your dismissal until he saw it on TV.
2) Benedict never dimissed you.
3) Benedict was never asked to approve your dismissal

From which we can infer with great probability that Ganswein was sitting on it.

But Bertone also said

4) Benedict has decided to reinstate you on His own authority.

That is why when Benedict reads an act of resignation just 4 days later, full of errors in the Latin, it makes you think that someone had to act quickly to get rid of Benedict before Gotti returned to his office and resumed his investigations.

BrotherBeowulf said…
I surmise that Gänswein was a plant by the St Gallen Mafia, from the beginning or at least coopted by them at some point prior to 2013.

The St Gallen Mafia--allied with criminal 'Cardinal' McCarrick whether or not a formal member--is the braintrust of the clerical Homosexual Network Strangling the Church. Of which criminal McCarrick certainly was a part and leader--like Francis now its chief.

Hence the hatred of Gänswein for Archbishop Viganò.

It's clear Gänswein had a vested interest in protecting against the truth coming out both as to financial corruption and the homosexual infiltration throughout the Vatican.

Isn't that the dual topic of the 300-page Dossier given Benedict in December 2012, that has never yet seen the light of day.

It would not surprise me in the least if Herr Gänswein features rather prominently in that dossier.

Popular posts from this blog

Bishops of Colorado gave an apparent Vaxx "Exemption" Letter & Stated: "Vaccination is Not Morally Obligatory and so Must Be Voluntary"

Today, the bishops of Colorado gave an apparent Vaxx " exemption" letter (21_8_Vaccine_Exemption_CCC_Fin...docx(20KB)) and stated that "Vaccination is Not Morally Obligatory and so Must Be Voluntary":  COLORADO CATHOLIC CONFERENCE 1535 Logan Street | Denver, CO 80203-1913 303-894-8808 | cocatholicconference.org   [Date]   To Whom It May Concern, [Name] is a baptized Catholic seeking a religious exemption from an immunization requirement. This letter explains how the Catholic Church’s teachings may lead individual Catholics, including [name], to decline certain vaccines. The Catholic Church teaches that a person may be required to refuse a medical intervention, including a vaccination, if his or her conscience comes to this judgment. While the Catholic Church does not prohibit the use of most vaccines, and generally encourages them to safeguard personal and public health, the following authoritative Church teachings demonstrate the principled religious

Does Francis's "Right-hand Man" Parra have a "Sexual Predation against Seminarians, Adultery, and even a Deadly Sex Game...[that] 'might even be a Scandal Surpassing that of McCarrick'"?

  Archbishop Edgar Peña Parra with Francis Today, the Call Me Jorge website asked "What could be so important that Francis interrupted his weekly adulation [Audience] session?": Pope gets a phone call during the Audience. Haven’t seen this before. Then he quickly leaves and says he will be back. pic.twitter.com/npCuPzdnxP — The Catholic Traveler (@MountainButorac) August 11, 2021 It was Abp. Mons. Edgar Robinson Peña Parra, Substitute for the Secretariat of State, who was involved in the recent scandal of mismanagement during the acquisition of a € 300 million building in London. Still no word on what the phone call was about . [http://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2021/08/what-could-be-so-important-that-francis.html] Who is Archbishop Edgar Robinson Peña Parra ? Parra according to the Catholic Herald is Francis's "right-hand man"[https://catholicherald.co.uk/roman-curia-the-popes-new-right-hand-man/] In 2019, Life Site News reported that Parra alleged

Might it be Good for all of us & for Francis to Read about the "Gruesome Death of Arius"?

  I have read the letters of your piety , in which you have requested me to make known to you the events of my times relating to myself, and to give an account of that most impious heresy of the Arians , in consequence of which I have endured these sufferings, and also of the manner of the death of Arius . With two out of your three demands I have readily undertaken to comply, and have sent to your Godliness what I wrote to the Monks; from which you will be able to learn my own history as well as that of the heresy . But with respect to the other matter, I mean the death, I debated with myself for a long time, fearing lest any one should suppose that I was exulting in the death of that man. But yet, since a disputation which has taken place among you concerning the heresy , has issued in this question, whether Arius died after previously communicating with the Church ; I therefore was necessarily desirous of giving an account of his death, as thinking that the question woul