Skip to main content

Might Ganswein have Covered-up for the "Financial... [Vatican] Corruption" Revealed by Vigano that "Pushed" Pope Benedict to Resign?

On February 15, 2013, the Daily Mail in the article "Was the Pope pushed? An abuse scandal, corruption and the dark intrigue behind Benedict's shock resignation" reported:

"[P]apal aides are promoted to archbishop when an ailing Pope wishes to create an unofficial 'gatekeeper'. But if Benedict knew he was about to quit, why appoint Ganswein to the position?"

"The Pope's departure also comes at a time of scrutiny over the Vatican's alleged links to the world of organised crime."

Is it possible that Ganswein was installed by the machinations of Vatican operatives of those who were "alleged[ly] link[ed] to the world of organised crime" to be a "gatekeeper" and cover-up corrupt financial matters as well as to "push" him psychologically to resign?

Moreover, in January 2013, Inside the Vatican revealed in the piece "The Pope's Trust in Monsignor Ganswein":

"It is said in Rome that Ganswein, in staunchly protecting the time and energy of the Pope... may have prevented the Pope from being informed about certain important matters, especially financial... like the cases of corruption alleged by Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano."

Might Ganswein have covered-up for the "financial... [Vatican] corruption" revealed by Vigano that "pushed" Pope Benedict to resign?

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Comments

Alexis Bugnolo said…
I know from a source at Rome, that Gotti, who worked at the Vatican but was dismissed by those involved in covering up corruption in financial matters, was told by Cardinal Bertone on Feb. 7, 2013 in an hour long meeting:

1) Benedict never knew about your dismissal until he saw it on TV.
2) Benedict never dimissed you.
3) Benedict was never asked to approve your dismissal

From which we can infer with great probability that Ganswein was sitting on it.

But Bertone also said

4) Benedict has decided to reinstate you on His own authority.

That is why when Benedict reads an act of resignation just 4 days later, full of errors in the Latin, it makes you think that someone had to act quickly to get rid of Benedict before Gotti returned to his office and resumed his investigations.

9:49 PM
BrotherBeowulf said…
I surmise that Gänswein was a plant by the St Gallen Mafia, from the beginning or at least coopted by them at some point prior to 2013.

The St Gallen Mafia--allied with criminal 'Cardinal' McCarrick whether or not a formal member--is the braintrust of the clerical Homosexual Network Strangling the Church. Of which criminal McCarrick certainly was a part and leader--like Francis now its chief.

Hence the hatred of Gänswein for Archbishop Viganò.

It's clear Gänswein had a vested interest in protecting against the truth coming out both as to financial corruption and the homosexual infiltration throughout the Vatican.

Isn't that the dual topic of the 300-page Dossier given Benedict in December 2012, that has never yet seen the light of day.

It would not surprise me in the least if Herr Gänswein features rather prominently in that dossier.
12:17 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more